Moral judgement from utilitarianism's point of view and my own - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Moral judgement from utilitarianism's point of view and my own

In this case, utilitarian reasoning will definitely through many people into confusion and they will find themselves in dilemmas when they are supposed to make decisions especially decisions concerning human life. Here is a case where a runway trolley is just about to kill five people. However, the runway trolley can be sidetracked using a switch and in this situation it will only kill one person and save the rest. As a person making the decision, what is the right thing to do? Because utilitarian theory suggests that, our decision must maximize the overall good, then the switch must be switched in order to kill one person and save the five. However, the big question is whether this is morally right addition to this, utilitarian theory requires that we put the interest of the group first and not the individual. This is because individuals possess a different degree of pleasure and pain. The moral rule for utilitarian are more general than ones specific moral judgment and it`s cannot be equated with any of the ethical principles since it will results to the greatest happiness only to greatest number of people but fails to consider the welfare and happiness of the minority. ...
Download paper

Summary

Introduction This paper seeks to analyze one good example of a moral judgment both in utilitarian view and my own view. My moral judgment in this paper is course of action that I deem to be more morally correct. In other words, I will simply state my judgment pertaining the specific side regarding the controversy I will argue for while considering utilitarianism`s view point…
Author : ghegmann

Related Essays

Whats the meaning of life? Meaning of life from religion point of view.
We go through all these chores in intervals between the acquainted milestones from birth to death. We get kids, lose parents, we complete studies find a job and start a marital life, set up homes enjoy accomplishments at some points and face failures on the other. Similarly, we make new friends, fight with the old ones, change house, cities, countries, change jobs, get hired and fired from different jobs, face many hardships, fall ill, recover, save a few bucks for our retirement and eventually retires. So, the life runs on its track for me, for you and for everyone and interestingly, these...
9 pages (2259 words) Essay
Debate from the point of view of Descartes and Searle
It is impossible to prove because mind is unreal.
...
2 pages (502 words) Speech or Presentation
Differences between Ethics and Law "From Bioethical Point of View"
Although there is a boundary between laws and ethics, the boundary does not separate them sufficiently. This paper seeks to define law and ethics and in the process try to bring out the difference between the two. Ethics comes from the notion of rights and wrongs within a given society. These wrong and rights are based on actions we would expect others to do for us in return. We are thus forced or expected to do to other people, as we would wish them to do to us. With time, these expectations have been developed into principles that define ethics in a given society. On the other hand, laws are...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Gambling From a Utilitarian and Deontology Point of View.
According to the study deontological and Utilitarian theories do not essentially forbid the involvement of gambling as a moral wrong but they show a moral basis which one should consider when deciding whether to dive into gambling or not. The moral status of actions relies on the character of God i.e. what is right and wrong in the eyes of God contrary to Utilitarianism that reflects the will and desires of man. Deontology may adjudicate gambling as honorably wrong. This is the case even in occurrences where nobody is hurt as a result of the act and actually successful results were achieved....
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Locke's point on view about empiristics
Explain why Berkeley maintains that if empiricists take these ideas seriously, Locke's account actually leads to radical doubts about the existence of the material world. What solution to this problem does Berkeley think that empiricists should accept? Berkeley's solution, however, is widely seen to be highly problematic. Which of these two problems-the (alleged) problems facing Locke or Berkeley's solution to these problems-seems to be the most damaging or difficult problem facing empiricism? Why? Critically defend your position. The empiricist claim of Locke proposes that knowledge only...
2 pages (502 words) Assignment
Gaunilo's argument from Anselm's point of view.
Gaunilo, a fellow monk and believer sought to oppose Anselm’s argument, saying it would force people to conclude existence of other non- existent things. His critic is usually described by philosophers as an overload idea, because he does not show how Anselm’s ideas are wrong but rather how it unsound in all applications, if it is unsound in one. Gaunilo argues that “god” in the argument placed by Anselm can be replaced by anything, in his case, “the perfect island. “Suppose we replace God with an island, this is how it would flow. Imagine a perfect island of which none like it is...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
My Own Personal Philosophy
Most of us believe that freedom is one of the most advantageous things on earth. It is an ingredient of a good life or the good life itself. Some of us may live their lives fighting for freedom. According to Immanuel Kant a German philosopher, freedom is not only a presupposition of a good life but also a logical prerequisite for morality and moral responsibility. If we were not free to act whether rightly or wrongly, then it would be senseless to hold us responsible for what we do or undertake. Kant argues that without freedom morality would not exist and life would not be worth living at...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!