• Home
  • Subjects
  • Philosophy
  • The Concept of Individuals Responsibility To other Members of Their Community by Peter Singer.

The Concept of Individuals Responsibility To other Members of Their Community by Peter Singer. - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
The Concept of Individuals Responsibility To other Members of Their Community by Peter Singer.

By taking a look at the donations from such an angle these countries generosity can be said to take a drastic dive when compared to their other expenses. One could say that these governments care more about their transport system for example than they do about the millions of lives that they could affect with such money (Singer). However, in realistic terms especially from an economic point of view, it is necessary that a government invests in projects that will bring back financial returns in a bid to provide a better stable economy from which they can operate from. Without these investments, they would not be able to donate any money to the causes that they provide funding for. Taking a look at the stance brought about by Singer and the economic defense of such actions by the governments it can be said that two clear sides emerge from this argument with each supporting the opposing sides. A good strategy to determine whether Singer was right in his evaluation of an individual’s responsibility to other members of their community as well as a government’s responsibility to society is by studying the underlying factors that would more or less govern the potential results of what certain actions may bring. ...
Download paper

Summary

The argument stated by the author of “Family, affluence and morality” Peter Singer can be said to be one that entails two sides and thus from a utilitarian point of view there are those who would agree with his stance as well as those who would not…
Author : jaydon99

Related Essays

Choose a point in singer(rethinking life and death) that you strongly disagree with. Explain this point and why u think he is wr
Singer as a philosopher had a distinctive perception on life and death. He believed that every person has the right to decide whether to live or not. However, I strongly disagree with his idea of infanticide where an innocent soul will be killed against the will of God. Killing a person in any stage of his life is a crime. There can be no sufficient reasons for killing a person whether he is disabled, unborn or handicapped. Singer being a philosopher failed to understand the divine essence of human of human soul. So it could be easier for him to argue towards infanticide because he consider...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Pick a stance on the rights of animals based on Peter Singer's article Famine"
The concept that we try to use to extract an argument for animal rights is the concept introduced by Singer that proximity does not matter. Whilst in this particular case, the proximity spoken of was geographic, .i.e., small child in neighbor’s house vis a vis a Bengali child, the proximity could also be in terms of species. In the logic of Peter Singer, animals cannot be denied rights given humans even if they are proximally different from the latter. Animal rights can find justification in theories of right that are embedded in time. It is interesting to begin this exposition by looking at...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Moral Obligations To The Poor In The Article by Peter Singer.
According to him, it is essential that human beings bring about a change in their moral conceptual scheme, i.e. the way they perceive moral issues and the commonly accepted way of life. As he remarks, it is commonly accepted at the international level that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are not good. In this background, Singer’s argument has great relevance in wider perspective, i.e. we have moral liability to prevent something bad from happening if it is in our power to do so. Therefore, it is indubitable that Singer’s article “Famine, Affluence, and...
3 pages (753 words) Assignment
Locke teaching on the individuals right to private property
Locke believes that all humans have certain rights which are given by God. He advocates equality. Religion is the back of all theories presented by him. State, individuality and private property are some theories based on the same principle. In this book he discusses how humans have a right to property and how and to what extent this affects the God. He advocated that although humans resided in a socially set system but all could not be treated the same way. He believed, “. a thinking, intelligent being, that has reason and reflection, and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Singer and Kant's Categorical Imperative
It is also involved in the study of ordinary ethical issues in other branches of medicine such as primary care. A good example of ordinary ethical issues is the decision to pull the switch on a patient who is being kept alive by hospital machines since they are brain dead hence the chances of their recovery are extremely small. One of the major contributors in bioethics is Peter Singer who has put across various theories in this field. One theory he stipulates is that sacrifices of significant interests must not be done for the sake of minor interest. By this, he means that when considering an...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Kant and Singer
It does not dictate equal treatment of all interests, in the belief that different interests guarantee different treatment (Singer 26). Human beings, therefore, give significant interests priority over minor interests. Apart from justifying different treatment for different interests, this principle calls for different treatment of the same interest where diminishing marginal utility is a factor.
...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Crisis Of Famine In Bengal. Peter Singer's Views On Our Duties Of Foreign Aid And Charity.
Peter puts these arguments forward by way of two principles; one of them proposes the extent to which death and suffering is bad irrespective of the cause, which ranges hunger, deficient housing and inadequate. Secondly, he argues that one is obligated to mitigate morally bad state of affairs if they are able to do that without having to sacrifice that with another with the same moral importance (Singer, 1972). In his argument, Singer proclaims that it is only moral to help those in need with disregard to causing the same impact on the people. The three counter-arguments given by Peter...
3 pages (753 words) Research Paper
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!