Preference to Normal over Disabled under QALY Based Allocation - Essay Example


Extract of sample
Preference to Normal over Disabled under QALY Based Allocation

Preference to Normal over Disabled under QALY Based Allocation

Equality states that each human being must be treated equally on all levels and the bias must be minimized to the minimum. However, with the advent of the Modern age, the world has been bombarded with an increase in population and problems that demand a solution and sometimes it is like choosing between the devil and the deep sea.

The probable rebuttal can be explained through an example. If three people have a car accident and the doctor’s can save only one, what are they going to do then? The doctors can come to the conclusion by looking at the health states of the patients. Consider that only one of them is physically fit and is 18 years old, the other is blind and 22 years old and the last one is chronically ill and 40 years old. The doctors need to make a hard choice nevertheless but they have limited resources. Hence, the doctors will try to save the physically fit, 18 years old patient who has a promise to life, the other two patient might not prove to be as beneficial to the society as this patient can be.

Most people would now think that this paper is biased towards the disabled people but actually it is not. This paper lays stress on the fact that there is no comparison between the normal people and disabled ones, just as their no comparison with squash and tennis, though both of them are played in a court with a ball and a racquet. ...
Download paper


This paper is aimed at proving that preferring a normal person over a disabled one through QALY tests is just. The above statement might instigate uproar because they say that QALY is biased as they favor younger and healthier people over chronically ill and disabled people.

Author : lilyan83
Download 0

Related Essays

The Hollywood Renaissance of the 1960s and Early 1970s
The decade of the 1960s and into the early 1970s marked a period of turbulence and change in the American socio-political landscape. Among the events giving way to this landscape were the civil rights movements, the hippy culture, radicalism among students, the new left, feminism, the gay rights’ movements, the anti-Vietnam war movements, the Kennedy assassination, the Watergate scandal, the US withdrawal from Vietnam and the oil crisis among other events (King 2002, p. 14). The period of the 1960s and early 1970s was also the Cold War era and many Americans feared a nuclear attack (Neve...
10 pages (2510 words) Essay
Mоvie Review on Stranger than Paradise
Mоvie Review on Stranger than Paradise
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Modern Ethical Theory or Pragmatism ( choose one)
These theories have in turn been relied upon heavily in determining the parameters of ethical and moral conduct across different cultures and under different circumstances. These theories draw from the ideas of great moral philosophers like John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant, David Hume among others. Hume vs Kant vs Mill: Their different views on ethics and morality. By giving their views, all moral philosophers aim at describing the best standard of moral and ethical conduct. However, there normally arises a dilemma on which ethical theory should be applied because of the variations in how...
4 pages (1004 words) Research Paper
The Modern Indians: Not Just another Minority Category, and Why
The Modern Indians: Not Just another Minority Category, and Why
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
choose from one from attached
Argument or view Kant’s Deontology posits that the best way to act morally to act from duty with the consideration of the highest good, that is, a good without condition which is intrinsically good by itself (Kant, 1780). He formulated his deontological ethics in a categorical imperative of doing good for the sake of good regardless of its consequence (Kant, 1785). Explication of argument To effectively argue that Kantian Deontology is the correct moral theory, it would be necessary to explain the formulation that executes Kant’s deontology which is categorical imperative. According to...
4 pages (1004 words) Term Paper
Rawls and Nozick have different conceptions of justice and liberty because of their divergences on deserts, government’s role in ensuring justice, and whether justice or liberty is more important than the other. The paper asserts that Rawls has a more superior theory of justice than Nozick because he relates his theory of justice to liberty and rights and justifies the importance of justice to liberty, while Nozick’s framework of justice may improve liberty’s basis for individual rights, but his theory can lead to gross inequalities that can be justified as moral. Rawls says that we do...
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Should Prostitution Be Prohibited?
Furthermore, it promotes the growth of an immorally-based community. Based on the above underpinning evidence, it is justifiable to strongly say that prostitution ought to be prohibited in our society. Prohibition of prostitution will reduce the high number of incidences of adultery. Prostitution gives men the opportunity to cheat on their girlfriends and wives in an easy. Therefore, if it is prohibited cheating men will suffer extremely consequences since the law will be on their toes. As a result, the number of men who take advantage of prostitutes, wives, or girlfriend will decrease...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!