Explain and critically assess Frankfurt's distinction between bullshitting and lying

Explain and critically assess Frankfurt
Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
FRANKFURT’S DISTINCTION BETWEEN BULLSHITTING AND LYING Name Course Professor Institution Date Submitted Frankfurt’s Distinction between Bullshitting and Lying Relaying wrong information about a person, event or act can take different approaches. Whereas some people may intentionally convey the wrong figures and distorted facts with malicious intents, others present misleading arguments for sheer lack of proper knowledge…

Introduction

In bullshit there is no knowledge of truth (Frankfurt, 2005, p. 43). A bullshitter lacks proper knowledge to support the statement he makes. The different situations in our multi-agent systems and human culture give strong support for bullshit. This research is meant to analyze particular problems regarding to reasoning in the social context. Bullshit is one of the most salient features in our culture. Everyone knows and contributes to it but takes the situation for granted. The majority of people are confident in their ability to recognize bullshit and avoid being caught up in it (Frankfurt, 2005, p. 21). This phenomenon has not raised much inquiry so people fail to understand what it is, why it there or what functions it serves. We lack a conscious appreciation of its relevance to us. Frankfurt analyses three categories of dishonesty which are weaker from plain lies but not less harmful in distorting knowledge in a common setting. A lie is the utterance of statement from a speaker which he clearly knows not to be true. In our social life, it very common for people to make statement or talk of things they have no proper knowledge of. It usually out of curiosity or to appear knowledgeable even when one is not. This is termed as bullshit since one has no knowledge of correct information. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

The Distinction between Pornography and Obscenity
MacKinnon, a feminist and an attorney, believes that society in the US applied different legal rights, lesser rights, to women as compared to men. Obscene speech is not protected under the First Amendment according to the U.S. Supreme Court, but there is much debate over the distinction between pornography and obscenity. Perhaps one of the most remembered Supreme Court Justice quotes is that of…
A Distinction Between Practical Anthropology And Moral Philosophy
The works of Kant (1728-1804), a German philosopher, are mostly drawn from the observations and his own ideas on the nature of humans. The major emphasis of this philosopher is on the priori or pure part of the moral philosophy. He strongly believes that in the operation of moral philosophy, the major determinant is inherent in reason and is also revealed through it. The difference between…
Explain and assess the role that virtue plays in Aristotle's theory of justice.
Aristotle claimed that justice should be dispensed in an appropriate manner. He also believed in the strength of virtue in changing the society. Aristotle's book, ‘Nicomachean Ethics’ explained the theory of virtue. He mentioned two kinds of virtue: the moral variety, and the intellectual variety (Raphael 2003). When Aristotle mentioned the subject of moral virtues, he spoke in reference to a…
Explain Harry Frankfurt's notion of a second-order volition. Does this notion have any bearing on the question of whether an
This essay is an attempt to analyseFrankfurt’s notion of a second order volition in the light of its impact on the freedom of will and action. (Shook, 2005, pp. 854-56) Frankfurt’s essay opens with his views on the concept of “person”. When his contemporaries seek to define a person as merely a body with states of consciousness, Frankfurt begs to differ. He states that a person is not just…
Distinction between just and unjust laws
The law according to racial bigotry was condemned by King and civil liberty advocates joined hands with him. When he wrote to reputable clergy men and they declared it as a civil disobedience against the law of the state (Boshier, 40-41). Even after years from the King’s anti-segregation campaigns one can witness inequality and chauvinism due to racist notions in the law abiding agencies of the…
Lying v. Misleading
Philosophers have not only tried to characterize the difference between lies and misleading statements, but also have debated over the moral significance of each kind of utterance. Therefore, the two main question s are what speech act is required for lying, as opposed to being misleading; and what is the moral difference between the two acts of speech. One theory, from a linguistic point of view,…
Heidegger's distinction between the "ready-to-hand" and the "present-to-hand"
Heidegger has approved the explanation with regard to philosophy as 'its own time comprehended in thought'; the same thought has been delivered by the historians. According to Heidegger, the history of philosophy was to be considered as Western civilization's ever-deepening forgetfulness or oblivion of being, and he disapproved the belief that supported progressive self-realization of spirit…