Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Frankfurt’s Distinction between Bullshitting and Lying - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Author : kirlinjuliet
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

The essay has provided information on the three classes of dishonesty: bullshit, lies and deception. It has described what bullshit is, its purpose on those who use it and why it so much on a collective level. …

Extract of sample
Frankfurt’s Distinction between Bullshitting and Lying

Bullshit is one of the most salient features in our culture. Everyone knows and contributes to it but takes the situation for granted. The majority of people are confident in their ability to recognize bullshit and avoid being caught up in it (Frankfurt, 2005, p. 21). This phenomenon has not raised much inquiry so people fail to understand what it is, why it there or what functions it serves. We lack a conscious appreciation of its relevance to us. Frankfurt analyses three categories of dishonesty which are weaker from plain lies but not less harmful in distorting knowledge in a common setting. A lie is the utterance of statement from a speaker which he clearly knows not to be true. In our social life, it very common for people to make statement or talk of things they have no proper knowledge of. It usually out of curiosity or to appear knowledgeable even when one is not. This is termed as bullshit since one has no knowledge of correct information. With lies there is a negative relation to the truth whereas bullshit there is no connection of what the speaker says with the truth
...
Download paper

Related Essays

The Distinction between Pornography and Obscenity
MacKinnon, a feminist and an attorney, believes that society in the US applied different legal rights, lesser rights, to women as compared to men. Obscene speech is not protected under the First Amendment according to the U.S. Supreme Court, but there is much debate over the distinction between pornography and obscenity. Perhaps one of the most remembered Supreme Court Justice quotes is that of Potter Stewart, who said, I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"]; and perhaps I could…
7 pages (1757 words)
A Distinction Between Practical Anthropology And Moral Philosophy
The works of Kant (1728-1804), a German philosopher, are mostly drawn from the observations and his own ideas on the nature of humans. The major emphasis of this philosopher is on the priori or pure part of the moral philosophy. He strongly believes that in the operation of moral philosophy, the major determinant is inherent in reason and is also revealed through it. The difference between Kant’s moral philosophy and the empirical moral philosophy is that the later is biased towards the posteriori principles or those that are garnered through the observations and experiences of human beings.…
6 pages (1506 words)
Explain and assess the role that virtue plays in Aristotle's theory of justice.
Aristotle claimed that justice should be dispensed in an appropriate manner. He also believed in the strength of virtue in changing the society. Aristotle's book, ‘Nicomachean Ethics’ explained the theory of virtue. He mentioned two kinds of virtue: the moral variety, and the intellectual variety (Raphael 2003). When Aristotle mentioned the subject of moral virtues, he spoke in reference to a person's character, and the way he conducted himself in his daily life. He stated that an individual’s character is a learned function, and not one that he was born with. Essentially, he felt that…
9 pages (2259 words)
Frankfurt’s notion of Second Order Volition
Frankfurt’s essay opens with his views on the concept of “person”. When his contemporaries seek to define a person as merely a body with states of consciousness, Frankfurt begs to differ. He states that a person is not just the singular form of ‘people’. It does not merely refer to the members of certain biological species with a set of specific physical and mental characteristics that are supposed to be uniquely human. Humans are not the only creatures with desires, motives and choices. But it is the capacity of reflective self-evaluation and a desire to be different from what they…
6 pages (1506 words)
Distinction between just and unjust laws
The law according to racial bigotry was condemned by King and civil liberty advocates joined hands with him. When he wrote to reputable clergy men and they declared it as a civil disobedience against the law of the state (Boshier, 40-41). Even after years from the King’s anti-segregation campaigns one can witness inequality and chauvinism due to racist notions in the law abiding agencies of the State. The letter was written in 1963 to the government’s higher officials to remind them of their civil responsibility to maintain equality irrespective of the race and cast. In 1999, the lawmakers…
3 pages (753 words)
Lying v. Misleading
Philosophers have not only tried to characterize the difference between lies and misleading statements, but also have debated over the moral significance of each kind of utterance. Therefore, the two main question s are what speech act is required for lying, as opposed to being misleading; and what is the moral difference between the two acts of speech. One theory, from a linguistic point of view, according to Stokke (2), is that there are different ways of conveying information, which means, in turn, that there is a difference in the speech acts involved in both misleading and lying. When one…
7 pages (1757 words)