You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
Name of Student Name of Professor Course and Course Number Date of Paper Deterrence Capacity of Capital Punishment In The Wisdom of Capital Punishment,” Lewis Pojman presented the contention that capital punishment, in contrast to imprisonment, is a more effective mechanism to discourage would be offenders from committing homicide (Pojman 272).
The arguments of Pojman, which supports capital punishment, were based on three premises from anecdotal evidence. First, the deterrent effect of an object is increased with the increased degree of fear it can cause to a person. Second, people fear death more than any humane punishment, and third, death penalty is a humane punishment. From these premises, the author concludes that the death penalty is a more effective mechanism to deter people from committing homicide compared to long imprisonment (277). The argument presented was potentially sound since it was supported by coherent reasoning. However, while the first premise is logical, the last two premises have a potential conflict since not all criminals are fearful of death and generally, capital punishment is inhumane. Nevertheless, the author’s conclusion still follows his premises since there is a high chance that potential criminals will avoid committing first degree crime if they are aware that the sentence that awaits them is death compared to long imprisonment. However, it is argued that capital punishment is not an appropriate sentence to major offenders. There is also a strong contention against the principle that the death penalty has a greater deterrence compared to long imprisonment. ...
Not exactly what you need?