She suffered from a condition that was so much in the heart (Daniel 2012). The deficiency of oxygen led to her big brain devastation or rather brain damage and thereafter the doctors vindicated that she suffered from vegetative state. The deficiency resulted from the heart malfunction that she developed so there was no proper intake of oxygen by the required blood vessel that is originating from the heart. The doctors’ report was after they had conducted several tests on her. The doctors were quite optimistic and hoped for the best for her. They tried several types of therapy ranging from speech and physical therapy as well as other experimental therapies. They thought that they would bring her back into a normal mental state. When the years passed by until 1998, Michael the husband to Terry filed a case in court for the removal of the feeding tube that was being used in the administration of food to his wife (David 2008). This was a petition that was highly rejected so much by the parents, who reasoned and maintained a firm stand that their daughter was not mentally ill. The court again came in with their own ascertainment that Terry does not prefer to continue with the exercises that are making her life longer. The feeding tube was then taken away from her and later put back. When the judge from Pinellas County made a ruling that the feeding tube removed from the patient, many voices came up from many parts such as the federal government that obliged the then president George Bush to ascent to another law just to prolong her life. This was a sign in which they valued the loss of a life. Many should emulate this kind of valuation. Life is a special gift from God and it should therefore be valued and kept ablaze like the Lord provided it (Donna 2010). It is important to note that the utilitarian has to do with getting the best out of a situation. It is also important to highlight that utilitarianism is all about getting the best from joy and happiness while you are suppressing the plights. The utilitarian position in this case of Terry Schiavo is that there was a rescue mission to save her from dying. In the case, there was a lot of thinking on how to maximize the utility. When she was put in the life support and the feeding tube used, there was the maximization of life as her life was prolonged. There was the removal of the feeding tube from the patient kind of led o the shortening of the life of Terry (George 2010). Again it is as well important to note that the action that was conducted to Terry was objective and the outcome was s ell meant to be on the positive end to Terry and her husband. I am therefore on the defending of the utilitarian act that was conducted to the patient. The principle of double effect in its stating says that a good exercise or action is dimensional. In the case of the patient, Terry, the principle was quite ideal as it authorized and allowed for the performance of the euthanasia for the good of Terry Schiavo. The action was morally accepted because its outcome was to do with saving life and not losing. The doctors had full knowledge on the action as they are the experts in the medical field (Janie 2012). It is important to highlight that the metaphysical presuppositions that underlie my approach in the case of Terry here are so broad. Considering the normal human assumptions, it
Name: Course: Tutor: Institution: Date: Introduction In looking at the case of Terry Schiavo was a legalized struggle that had to with long life support in the United States that occurred from the year of 1990 to the year of 2005. It is important to highlight that the case here was on the following of the strategies of the stopping the support of her life…
Euthanasia is Greek for “happy death,” and involves the active killing of another because one's life is not worth living. The practice has been widely legalized throughout Europe, although the United States has yet to legalize it.
Euthanasia is commonly referred as ‘mercy killing’ or a ‘good death’. It entails bringing about the death of a patient in belief that the existence of the patient is so bad that he or she is better off dead than alive.
However, active euthanasia is undertaken on an individual only when his or her doctors and family members agree and make the decision to kill actively to end the agony suffered by their loved one. Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, lets the suffering person die by withholding the necessary medical care and allowing the disease to kill the person instead of a fellow human being.
They are illegal in many jurisdictions but data shows that physicians still conduct these procedures. This paper reviewed existing literature on the controversy as to the practices and identified the need for legalization of physically assisted death within the context of the involved ethical concerns and public utility.
Legislative discussions for permitting active euthanasia in various countries have been repeatedly debated among their politicians, jurists, ethicists and even medical practitioners often resulting in drastic to insignificant or ambiguous changes in the concerned country’s legal framework.
death free of anxiety and pain brought about through the use of medication or deliberately putting an end to someone’s life in order to spare the individual from suffering”. Euthanasia is therefore believed to be beneficial to the person on whom it is brought about because
first one being the admission of a poisonous injection to the patient by the doctor and the second one being abstention from performing acts that will prolong a patient’s life like refusal to administer medication or intentionally not connecting them to life support
On the other hand, assisted euthanasia is a term used to describe the act whereby a patient himself administers life taking drugs for ending his life. These drugs are prescribed by the clinical practitioner but he is involved in their administration. This
In the religious tenets human life is in the hands of a supreme being who is the almighty God and a fellow man has no authority to end the life of another. As such religious faith is a strong opponent of this
2 pages (500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com