end the relation between aesthetic experience and value? Of late questions have arisen and have been likely to have a skeptical cast, as to whether the use of anesthetic is explicated without appeal to others, or whether the term answers any genuine philosophical purpose.The expressed skepticism by these questions did not hold until the end of the twentieth century. This fact prompted the question as to whether (a) notion of aesthetic is fundamentally problematic and has just become known, or (b) the notion is fine and has become cluttered enough for our imagination. Deciding between these possibilities needs a vantage from which to take concerning both early as well as late theories on aesthetic matters.The notion of aesthetic descends from the notion of taste.The reason why the notion of taste commanded a lot of philosophical attention in the eighteenth century was due to the theory of taste that had emerged of which was a corrective measure to the upraise of objectivism in regard to beauty. With this rise especially applied to virtue. While objectivism was against beauty, the judgment of beauty in the eighteenth century idea of taste was to be immediate, against self-absorption of virtue and held the desire of beauty to be disinterested (“Relativism vs. Objectivism” 1). In any given debate, arguments especially to do with relativism versus objectivism tend to separate leaving no in between. The Slippery slopes myth says that people who are on one side of any argument easily find it easier to blame people on another side of an argument. However, concerning the other side of slippery slopes can also be extreme. For example, the prevalent abortion debates that exist today. Furthermore, the relativism versus objectivism argument in philosophy is not altered either. Objectivists blame relativist of being subjectivists that look for ethical negativism by claiming that morality is up to the individualism; relativist blame objectivists of being absolutists of whom believe that all queries have a single right answer, regardless of culture or context. With such a debate, majority population holds the view of falling somewhere in between. Concerning relativism, this interpretation states that the moral principles are lawful, but vary in culture (conventionalism) or individuals (subjectivism). For instance, Ruth Benedict debates that different cultures have different principles, how can someone judge another person. Each of these moralities is equally legal. She goes on to argue from the angle of normality that each culture outlines what behavior is considered normal, in order to fit the majority’s behavior. The said majority population then describes normality as well as living by it, and the small minority is seen as abnormal. Ruth calls majority “socially convenient approved ways” and standard as “variations of good concepts.” Put differently, whatever social acceptable behavior is considered good and normal. While subjectivism is considered the extreme result of relativism. That being said we can say that morality is determined on an individual level and not at a social or even universal level. Therefore, moral principles that are viewed as valid are the ones a person believes in. Making all principles
Cite this document
(“Aesthetic relativism versus aesthetic objectivism Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/115384-aesthetic-relativism-versus-aesthetic-objectivism
(Aesthetic Relativism Versus Aesthetic Objectivism Essay)
“Aesthetic Relativism Versus Aesthetic Objectivism Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/115384-aesthetic-relativism-versus-aesthetic-objectivism.
Cited: 0 times
The notion of anesthetic was introduced in the eighteenth century, and the term aesthetic has now become used to designate things like, kind of object, kind of experience, kind of judgment as well as a kind of value…
At this point, it would be critical to understand the level at which people tend to be differentiated as of their evaluations. Current paper focuses on the differences between objectivism and relativism, especially regarding the use of the above concepts in the context of aesthetic evaluation..
his paper purports to discuss the aesthetic perspectives in art by comparing and contrasting two pairs of artwork. The first pair to be analyzed is the “Mystic Package” by Claudio Bravo and “Rabbit” by Jeff Koons. “Mystic Package” is a painting on paper by Claudio Bravo made in 1967 (Horsley, 2003).
ABSTRACT AESTHETIC STANDARDS Overview of the Statement There is an old saying that goes that, do not judge a book by its cover. It could perhaps be on the basis of this good old saying that George Orwell made his statement that “abstract aesthetic standards are all bunkum and… a book is only a “good” book if it preaches the right sermon” (Hooks, 2001).
This paper is based on Immanuel Kant’s arguments within his “Critique of the Power of Judgment”. First, the paper presents one of Kent’s peculiarities in judging taste. Second, the paper illustrates this peculiarity with the use of an example. Third, the relationship between the first peculiarity and beauty are explained in line with the postulates of Kent.
If, historically, past art seemed much preoccupied with imitating the world, the art properly so-called of Beardsley 's day is avant-garde or modernist, which means that it is about imitating imitation, or representing representation, or, to put it differently, it is about exploring its own nature as a pictorial medium.
manifestations (as shape, color, sound, etc.), a meaningful design or pattern, or something else (as a personality in which high spiritual qualities are manifest).” Aesthetics, on the other hand, solicit diverse meanings, to wit: “the study of art and beauty” (Steinbauer
While artistic value is the core of any art prepared, aesthetic value can or may fail to occur simultaneously with the art value. In the photo Cats Cradle by Charles White, the artwork is of minimal aesthetic
This essay explores Digital Technologies and Innovative Materials for Fashion Applications. In today’s world as one progress in age, the choice of clothes he or she wears change. Even movement from one place to another seems to have a considerable influence to the choice of clothing one makes. People’s dressing is used define their personality.
10 pages (2500 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Aesthetic relativism versus aesthetic objectivism for FREE!