Please boost your Plan to download papers
Essay example - International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge: That Which Is Accepted As Knowledge Today Is Sometimes Discarded Tomorrow
Pages 6 (1506 words)
The researcher of this essay aims to analyze what is going to be the scientific theory in the future. This essay focuses on the analysis of the scientific theories of knowledge, that are changing day by day and the issues of morality and ethics, that played a huge role in the past…
Extract of sample
The researcher states that knowledge is highly dynamic and unstable. Human intelligence has some limitations in understanding the secrets of life and this world. It is a fact that humans are a kind of creation, even though they are superior in terms of intelligence compared to other creatures. A creation can never be superior to the creator. For example, a computer or robot can never dominate human intelligence since they are only creations by the humans. Humans are responsible for giving intelligence to computers or robots. Similarly, the intelligence of humans is given by the creator, and human definitions and understandings about this world need not be faultless. It should be noted that the creator might have plenty of intentions while creating this universe and life forms. Humans cannot grasp such intensions fully. What humans know about this world is negligible compared to what they do not know. The universe consists of an infinite number of galaxies and stars, and it would be difficult for human intelligence to know about all such things. Humans are still struggling to send a satellite to the moon or Mars which is located nearer to the earth. Under such circumstances, how can we think about sending an artificial space expedition satellite to planets of other stars to know more things? It is evident that the capabilities of a human are limited, and hence the theories and principles formulated by him need not be correct at all times. In short, ‘that which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow’. ...
Not exactly what