The question about the existence of the universe is one that has elicited a lot if debates. There have been many arguments presented in the explanation of why and how the universe came into existence. Theism, or the concept of a Supreme Being, is one of the most common forms of explanations that individuals use to explain existence of the universe. …
The Principle of Sufficient Reason follows the idea that everything must have an explanation. In the arguments for God’s existence, this principle is commonly used to explain the causal or creative power. There are normally four unique forms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. The first one is known as the Principle of Sufficient Reason of Becoming is the first form and it states that if an object’s new form appears, there must have been another similar state. The Principle of Sufficient Reason of knowing states that for judgment to express some knowledge, there must be sufficient ground which serves as a basis for the knowledge. This quality gives judgment a level of being true a fact that can be used on the judgment when it is being used for something else. The principle of Sufficient Reason of Acting states that all human decisions are results of an object that has the power to determine the will of humans by acting as the motive for such a will.
Just like the Principle of Sufficient Reason, the cosmological argument maintains that the existence of the universe had to come from somewhere (Sullivan 330). In other words, there must have been an original or first cause that made it possible for the universe to exist. The cosmological point of view highlights the relevance of the first cause, arguing that the first cause does exist and is most certainly recognizable as God. In this regard, the cosmological world view about the existence of God may require the Principle of Sufficient Reason to put more emphasis on the fact that the first cause, or God, has an explanation.
In this regard, the cosmological world view about the existence of God may require the Principle of Sufficient Reason to put more emphasis on the fact that the first cause, or God, has an explanation. Rowe in his explanation of the Cosmological Argument, identifies two parts of the Principle of Sufficient Reason: the first part requires that an explanation is necessary for the existence of everything, which means that one must be able to identify the cause of any being that is in existence. The second part of the principle requires that for any positive fact, there has to be an explanation. Rowe argues that there are three ways of explaining the existence of a being: explanation by itself, by another being or by nothing (Rowe 18). This means that the existence of all beings, and to a great extension, the whole universe, is fully accounted for. I completely agree with the views of the Cosmological Argument presented by Rowe. There has to be an explanation or a reason why the universe exists or why things are the way they are. For the universe to come to existence, it must have come from somewhere. The cause of this existence is definitely a Supreme Being, or God. I disagree with those who oppose the Cosmological Argument saying that the existence of the universe does not necessarily mean that there is a Supreme Being. I also support Leigniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason which implies the same thing implied by the Cosmological Argument: that there must be sufficient reason for everything that exists or happens and this sufficient reason is definitely God. Many people normally ask then if this is the case, is there a sufficient reason for God to exist (Rowe and Trakakis 3). In my opinion, God’s existence ...
Cite this document
(“Rowe's Cosmological Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/37720-rowes-cosmological-argument
(Rowe'S Cosmological Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Rowe'S Cosmological Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/37720-rowes-cosmological-argument.
A cosmological argument attempts to prove the existence of God. The argument attempts to do this by showing that an infinite number of regressions that caused things to exist, is not there. The cosmological argument usually asserts that God is the final uncaused cause of all things.
The other arguments for the existence of God are the Teleogical and the Ontological arguments, which are posteriori and priori respectively (Rowe 21). The Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle were the pioneer writers of The Cosmological Argument. Aquinas in the 13th century gave five arguments distinctly for the existence of God.
According to their argument, the minority groups are sidelined in terms of accessing higher education. In terms of progressive development, gaps are still noticeable in respect of education accessed by the males and females. In this regard, it seems the girl child still lag behind when considering right to education for all.
Violence amongst young people, it is claimed, is becoming increasingly common and hip-hop is partly to blame. However, not everyone sees it quite like that. Despite its negative press, hip-hop has also been seen as a
We see in the world around us that there is an order of efficient causes. Nor is it ever found (in fact it is impossible) that something is its own efficient cause. If it were, it would be prior to itself, which is impossible. Nevertheless, the order of efficient causes
In his essay on this fascinating topic, Highlet shows himself to be a true believer. He describes his own relationship with Zen and shows why he thinks Zen can be more than a philosophy.
One of Highlet’s main arguments in his essay is the
Federalism refers to a scenario where partial self governing states operate under a central regime. At this level, the federates and the central government have powers that are dictated by law, and cannot be negated or ignored by either party. Anti-federalism refers to a
Thousands of people are registering for admissions in universities for undergraduate and postgraduate courses (Useem & Miller, 126). Education levels beyond the age of 16 years are however not regarded compulsory.
Many individuals and organizations keep claiming that higher
The second premise states that the universe or the world began to exist. The third premise states that if the world has a cause, then the cause of the world is powerful, personal and immaterial.
The first premise which states that there
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Rowe's Cosmological Argument for FREE!