We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Applications of Categorical Imperative and the Greatest Happiness Principle in Law The concept of law in every society is substantially impressionable and must be debated upon and well thought of, taking all aspects of morals and ethics into consideration…
Download paper
How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law

Two particular theories or principles that have been applied in law are Categorical Imperative (CI) by Immanuel Kant and the Greatest Happiness Principle (GHP) by Stuart Mill. Kant’s categorical imperative theory provides a way of evaluating the motives behind an action. According to Kant1 (27), an imperative refers to any proposition that declares a particular action or inaction as necessary. Obligations and duties are therefore derived from these imperatives. On the other hand, a categorical imperative refers to a requirement that is absolute and unconditional, and asserts its authority in all conditions. A violation of the categorical imperatives constitutes immorality. CI sets duty as an act done out of respect for the moral law (Kant2 54). In relation to this, the moral worth of an action cannot be derived from its consequences. This means that the source of moral worth of an action is the ground principle or reason under which an act is performed irrespective of the desired outcomes or all other aspects. From these explanations, an action can only be said to have moral content if it was done with an absolute regard of a sense of moral duty. Kant applies a deontological approach in his ideas. For example, an action is only termed as being moral if it possesses a certain universal value. A maxim refers to a ground principle of action or a ground rule. In Kant’s CI, a certain intention is merged with this maxim in order to become law. According to Kant, the duties, in this case the CI, are established by the law and a motivation to fulfill our CI is basically a respect of the state laws. This means that motivation to fulfill the outlined duties is an indication of the respect of whatever law that makes that action to be a duty (Anthony 29). On his part, Mill described justice as a component of law in terms of utilitarian functions. According to Mill utilitarianism refers to a standard of morality whose ultimate goal is to achieve happiness with the majority of the population (Mill 16). Mill summarizes utilitarianism through his principle of the Greatest Happiness. This principle holds that an act is correct if it tends to promote happiness and if it produces the reverse of happiness, then that action is wrong. Happiness here refers to the absence of pain and the achievement of intended pleasure. Pain and privation of happiness form the components of unhappiness (Mill 16). From the above explanation on utilitarianism, it is evident that in the Greatest Happiness Principle, it is not the happiness of the individual agent that matters. Instead, it is the happiness that will be achieved for all. Utilitarianism can therefore attain its goal, in relation to law, by cultivating the nobleness of the people so that all people are in a position to benefit from the honors of others. The principle of the greatest happiness requires that we shift our focus from our individual happiness towards ends and objects. An example of this is doing others good as noted by Brink (90). This means one should seek to improve the lives of others as a way of making them happy. The law usually outlines rules to be followed by a group of people and punishments that follow a breach of these rules. The Greatest Happiness Principle does not oppose the administration of corrective measures for those who break the law. Although the theory acknowledges that punishment does not bring the greatest happiness, it accepts that punishment is a necessary sacrifice whose end is a maximization ... Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/37913-how-are-the-categorical-imperative-kant-and-or-the
(How Are the Categorical Imperative (Kant) And/Or the Greatest Essay)
“How Are the Categorical Imperative (Kant) And/Or the Greatest Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/37913-how-are-the-categorical-imperative-kant-and-or-the.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Kant's and Mill's Philosophical Theories on Morality
Where Kant perceives morality as existing before experience, Mill denies morality is in any way universal. Mill argues that any number of systems of morality could be viable before proposing one that he thinks would be most beneficial to society. In this paper, I will introduce the logic behind Kant’s universal morality.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Death Penalty, Kantian Ethics, and Utilitarianism
Capital punishment or Death Penalty is still retained extensively around the world, especially in the Muslim nations and United States. According to the most recent statistics, 58 countries still retain it while 97 have completely abolished it. Human rights organizations and activists all over the world have been protesting against this punishment and are in favor of abolishing it globally.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Moral dilemma of whether euthanasia is ethically acceptable
My own experience visiting, interacting with residents and workers, and reflecting on those experiences at Brandon Woods is the mine of concrete experience on which I intend to draw insights into the ethics of euthanasia.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Mill tried to explain utilitarianism as involving the various aspects of pleasure including aesthetics, beauty, and enjoyment (4). Utilitarianism has been described as involving all the pleasure that one yearns including the pleasure of the moment. This moral philosophy views life as essentially desiring pleasure.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Human Rights Universalism and its Critics
vii). What the career diplomat and architect of Cold War policy for the United States and her Western allies had in mind was a greater respect and advocacy of human rights, in addition to the justifications for war and peace. Human rights, needless to say, is an imperative subject in terms law, the state of nature, morality and ethics and the very being of man and his interactions with other humans.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Singer moral principle. Peter Singer and greatest happiness principle
In this article he has emphasized on two issues. One issue is an analogy provided by him. In this analogy he mentions that if a child is drowning in a pond then we should save him if there is no fear of risking our lives in that act. If we really face such a situation then it would without doubt be a moral obligation to save the child.
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review
21st Century Children Using or Abused By ICT
These compel the society to form rules and regulations. The evolution of Ethics is based on insight and personal experiences for the well-being of the society. Theories of Immanuel Kant on morality need to be applied. Not anything that gives happiness
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Pro/Con paper on Moralistic Views of Eminent Domain using atleast Utilitarian and Konte
In the United States under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, the owner of the appropriated land is entitled to a reasonable compensation or the fair market value for the property. The government is supposed to
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law
There are different theories that help to approach the concept of obedience to the law and reasons for punishment. Two particular theories or principles that have been applied in law are Categorical
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Is it morally right thing to do is always the thing which will produce the greatest happiness for the greatest memebers Kant vs. Mill
For example, in the modern world, should morality be influenced by actions that take into consideration the greatest number of people affected; or should the rationale of morality focus on logic and other personal
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us