Defending Descarter's Cogito Ergo Sum

Defending Descarter
Undergraduate
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
Name Course Title Name of Professor Date of Submission Defending Descartes’s Cogito Ergo Sum If we take into account the idea of false ideas, it becomes somewhat understandable to me that we can exist without a physical form just by ‘thinking’. For example, my parents might be thinking at this moment that I am not in Texas…

Introduction

Hence, we should, I think, recognize that it is possible, to a certain extent, to think of things, which certainly do not have a physical form. The justification for my argument is grounded mainly on Descartes’s Meditations. He decisively focused on the argument, as seen in the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, confidently carved the independent realms of religion and reason, and trusted that his effort would discreetly, but determinedly, re-establish reason to its legitimate place (Sarkar 2003). However, there are detractors of Descartes’s ‘cogito ergo sum’ (I think, therefore, I am), such as the mostly overlooked philosopher Michel de Montaigne. Montaigne was the forerunner of Descartes, with perspectives on reason that have a great deal of influence on the theories of his descendants in France (Hatfield 2003). Edwin M. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

The Nature of Descartes' Program of Radical Doubt and the Reason He Engages in This Program
As it is however, no significant degree of being radical may be detected, yet for the nature of doubt which Descartes presented, the philosophically radical part of his program is perceived on casting doubt upon ‘senses’ which has frequently been neglected. At this stage, he had come to express hence - “All that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and…
What is the significance of Descartes' Cogito argument?
This argument of Descartes’ relates to two other theories laid down by him, namely, ‘the Evil Demon’ and the ‘Dreaming and Doubt’ arguments. This paper thus helps to provide an insight into the significance of the cogito ergo sum argument and its relation with these other two philosophical theories by Descartes. In his Second Meditation, Descartes has tried to explain his argument with…
Rationalism and Pragmatism of James and Descartes
According to him, he carried out thoughts on his own doubt and was sceptical about the existence of people in order to see whether or not the doubt that he had in his mind would survive. However, as he carried out his arguments and personal belief in his existence he found that it was impossible to doubt whether or not a person was living. A God that deceived an individual and made him think twice…
Atheism: Defending its Basic Principles
A. The Problem on the Concept of God …
The views of Plato with Aristotle on the nature of universals
He maintained that general ideas (universals) have a real existence, while the individual things that appeared to people really existing did not exist in fact. Ideas composed a special world, the reality of which was permanent and immobile. The ideas were the true cause of all things, their properties, relations, and, simultaneously, their goal. The general was dying in the individual specific…
Phil essay
The views were very mechanical in nature and were based on the rejection of Aristotelian science that had been seen as a widely accepted fact, and was also evident in the work done by him. His ideas were also based loosely on the rejection of metaphysics and the acceptance of epistemology, which changed the questions from how they took place to occurrence. The fact that he had almost no formal…
I Think, Therefore I am
This means that he is allowing credibility to only his consciousness and cognitive powers, and not to that of any other objective audience. Indeed his method leaves no room for the derivation of a third-person truth, which would require the acknowledgement of premises beyond the perceiving being's conscious self.…