Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Defending Descarter's Cogito Ergo Sum - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : hdurgan

Summary

Name Name of Professor Defending Descartes’s Cogito Ergo Sum If we take into account the idea of false ideas, it becomes somewhat understandable to me that we can exist without a physical form just by ‘thinking’. For example, my parents might be thinking at this moment that I am not in Texas…

Extract of sample
Defending Descarter's Cogito Ergo Sum

Hence, we should, I think, recognize that it is possible, to a certain extent, to think of things, which certainly do not have a physical form. The justification for my argument is grounded mainly on Descartes’s Meditations. He decisively focused on the argument, as seen in the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, confidently carved the independent realms of religion and reason, and trusted that his effort would discreetly, but determinedly, re-establish reason to its legitimate place (Sarkar 2003). However, there are detractors of Descartes’s ‘cogito ergo sum’ (I think, therefore, I am), such as the mostly overlooked philosopher Michel de Montaigne. Montaigne was the forerunner of Descartes, with perspectives on reason that have a great deal of influence on the theories of his descendants in France (Hatfield 2003). Edwin M. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

The Nature of Descartes' Program of Radical Doubt and the Reason He Engages in This Program
As it is however, no significant degree of being radical may be detected, yet for the nature of doubt which Descartes presented, the philosophically radical part of his program is perceived on casting doubt upon ‘senses’ which has frequently been neglected. At this stage, he had come to express hence - “All that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and certainty, I received either from or through the senses.
6 pages (1506 words)
What is the significance of Descartes' Cogito argument?
This argument of Descartes’ relates to two other theories laid down by him, namely, ‘the Evil Demon’ and the ‘Dreaming and Doubt’ arguments. This paper thus helps to provide an insight into the significance of the cogito ergo sum argument and its relation with these other two philosophical theories by Descartes. In his Second Meditation, Descartes has tried to explain his argument with respect to the existence of human beings. According to him, he carried out thoughts on his own doubt and was sceptical about the existence of people in order to see whether or not the doubt that he had…
3 pages (753 words)
Rationalism and Pragmatism of James and Descartes
According to him, he carried out thoughts on his own doubt and was sceptical about the existence of people in order to see whether or not the doubt that he had in his mind would survive. However, as he carried out his arguments and personal belief in his existence he found that it was impossible to doubt whether or not a person was living. A God that deceived an individual and made him think twice about his existence was termed as an ‘Evil Demon’ by Descartes and he says that even if this argument were not true, one would still have to exist in order to be deceived. “But I have convinced…
4 pages (1004 words)
Atheism: Defending its Basic Principles
A. The Problem on the Concept of God …
4 pages (1004 words)
The views of Plato with Aristotle on the nature of universals
He maintained that general ideas (universals) have a real existence, while the individual things that appeared to people really existing did not exist in fact. Ideas composed a special world, the reality of which was permanent and immobile. The ideas were the true cause of all things, their properties, relations, and, simultaneously, their goal. The general was dying in the individual specific things. Aristotle criticized Plato’s concept. Of the crucial importance for Aristotle was the fact that general was manifested only through the individual that was given through the sense experience.…
3 pages (753 words)
Phil essay
The views were very mechanical in nature and were based on the rejection of Aristotelian science that had been seen as a widely accepted fact, and was also evident in the work done by him. His ideas were also based loosely on the rejection of metaphysics and the acceptance of epistemology, which changed the questions from how they took place to occurrence. The fact that he had almost no formal kind of training in the process, imparted a very unique way of looking at things. A DISCUSSION ON THE CONCEPT Cogito ergo sum has the meaning that any person thinking about the existence of himself or…
3 pages (753 words)