You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Defending Descarter's Cogito Ergo Sum
Pages 3 (753 words)
Name Course Title Name of Professor Date of Submission Defending Descartes’s Cogito Ergo Sum If we take into account the idea of false ideas, it becomes somewhat understandable to me that we can exist without a physical form just by ‘thinking’. For example, my parents might be thinking at this moment that I am not in Texas.
Hence, we should, I think, recognize that it is possible, to a certain extent, to think of things, which certainly do not have a physical form. The justification for my argument is grounded mainly on Descartes’s Meditations. He decisively focused on the argument, as seen in the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, confidently carved the independent realms of religion and reason, and trusted that his effort would discreetly, but determinedly, re-establish reason to its legitimate place (Sarkar 2003). However, there are detractors of Descartes’s ‘cogito ergo sum’ (I think, therefore, I am), such as the mostly overlooked philosopher Michel de Montaigne. Montaigne was the forerunner of Descartes, with perspectives on reason that have a great deal of influence on the theories of his descendants in France (Hatfield 2003). Edwin M. ...
Not exactly what you need?