Are we our bodies or are we our minds? Descartes and Nietzsche's arguments - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Are we our bodies or are we our minds? Descartes and Nietzsche's arguments

I will discuss and compare arguments from both philosophers’ viewpoints in order to reach a conclusion. In “Meditations on First Philosophy,” Rene Descartes begins to uncover the underlying truth for humankind through various methods. His ideas and thoughts were considered radical at that time, particularly because his arguments went against those made by Aristotle, upon which society perceived truth (SparkNotes Editors). Because of this fact, Descartes tried to entice Aristotelian philosophers into reading all six meditations by starting off light. The first meditation is supposed to build the groundwork and is not supposed to come up with any quick answers. Descartes conveys to himself that whatever he thinks he knows so far must be doubted in order to build a solid foundation that cannot be proven false. He argues in the first meditation that his body is faulty and is bound to make errors. This leads him to believe that it cannot be trusted in showing him what the real truth is. In addition, he also starts to doubt his senses as they are an extension of his body and are thus flawed. Left with knowing nothing, Descartes slowly transcends into deep thought and begins to ponder if the world in which he lives is just a “universal dream” where some evil genius is trying to manipulate him in every possible way. ...
Download paper


First and Last Name Professor’s Full Name Name of Course or Subject 8 July 2011 Are we our Bodies or are we our Minds? Descartes and Nietzsche’s arguments In philosophy, the imperative matter of what is mind and what is body comes into practice many times as philosophers deconstruct the human disposition…
Author : itorp

Related Essays

What are the sources of epistemology? What are the limits and structure of epistemology? If it is considered as a study of justified belief (JB), epistemology deals to reply to such questions as: How are we able to comprehend the idea of justification? What are the factors which make these justified beliefs justify? Is this justification external or internal to one’s own mind? Broadly comprehend epistemology deals with issues of dissemination and creation of knowledge in specific areas of question. This paper talks about what epistemology is, how it relates to justified belief, what is...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Are We Free to Choose? Or, Are Our Actions Determined by Outside Forces?
It is very clear from the experiences of Emily and Kenneth that the two were psychologically unfit to make a decision out of free will. Part Two: Argument analysis. Most of the time people make decisions and later regret why they make such moves. In decisions made out of free will, people do not regret on the consequences of their actions. Emily and Kenneth regretted on their actions because they suffered. Since individual choices come with responsibility, we need to have the right kind control over our will and desire in the appropriate way. Although determinism may present an upfront...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Can we know when to trust our emotions in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider history and one other area of knowledge.
At other times. Emotions are neither negative nor positive. This mainly occurs when we lay our fundamental beliefs on matters of the heart rather than using brains to make our conclusions. This type of emotion provides us with strength to engage in intellectual activities. Knowledge is learning or studying something new a person didn’t know before.knowldge and its power suppresses normal schooling as it comes through a very long process of experiences (Campbell, 2002, pp204). Though schooling is educational, it cannot give someone an opportunity to experience knowledge that is experienced...
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Descartes holds that we can literally see other people (as opposed to, say, hats and feet from an upper-story window). Explain h
However, in real sense, Descartes actually posits that humans can understand their minds more readily than they can possibly ever understand their corporeal nature, which is subject to doubt (Newman). The theorist bases his arguments on the example of wax in its various forms i.e. solid and liquid form; according to Descartes, the perception senses cannot recognize the semblance in the different forms. In other words, the human senses are inadequate in themselves to effectively describe whether or not the molten wax is similar to the solid wax. Failure by the senses to recognize that both...
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Should wehelpthe poor? Yourdiscussion should includeeither Pogge'sarguments (in "Poverty,Climate Change and Overpopulat
As one of the many life-threatening social issues, poverty is associated to many deaths, including diseases and violence, especially in the underdeveloped countries. (Pogge, 2010).  A great factor in the increase of poverty is the unequal distribution of wealth, which leads to social inequality. The economic inequality skews the economic opportunities of people to gain the financial stability they need to ensure a life without poverty. The more unequal the distribution of wealth is, the greater number of people there is at the bottom of the economic and social structure. Pogge’s argument on...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
There must be a proper procedure of metaphysical verification through which the mind can get certain of what it thinks and there must be strong emphasizing proofs for his. But later on refuting has own arguments to some extent, Rene argues that since he is certain about the fact that he is thinking about something, so he can conclude on this tautology that man is something which has the ability to think. Existence of God is one of the most important and centric circle of attention for the mediator. He builds the proofs for the existence of God by building an argument based in the human mind...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Are We Free, or Are Our Actions Determined?
Existentialist, on the other hand, would tell you that all that there is for mankind is what he makes of himself; there is no ideal because there is no “God” figure to oversee such judgments. There are strong supporters and opponents on both sides of the issue. However, after reviewing the arguments it strikes me most sensible that neither is really right. Existentialism, again, primarily, relies on the atheistic perspective of existence. Without a God figure reality becomes solely a product of nature and humanity is a child of its own devices (Sarte 1-2). This perspective is disagreeable...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!