Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

A Philosophical Review of Nature's and Animal Rights - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Undergraduate
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 6 (1506 words)

Summary

Running Head: Environmental Ethics A Philosophical Review of Nature’s and Animal Rights Case Analyses Name Name of Professor Question 1 As stated by Gary Varner, biological interest has been defined by Feinberg (1974) as “an interest, however the concept is finally to be analyzed, presupposes at least rudimentary cognitive equipment…

Extract of sample
A Philosophical Review of Nature's and Animal Rights

In contrast, Tom Regan disputes that there is a difference between ‘having an interest in something’ and ‘taking an interest in it’ (Varner, 1998, 55), which then implies that domestic species, being mindless species, have innate biological interests. Regan thus defined biological interest in this way: “the two senses really are logically distinct: A being can be interested in something that is not in his interests, and something may be in a being’s interest despite the fact that he is not interested in” (Varner, 1998, 55). This means that domestic species, having no conscious desires in any way, have biological interest of their own. Regan added that plants and objects can reasonably be thought to have biological interests, since both have intrinsic values in their own breed. On the other hand, Gary Varner (1994) argues that if all living things have biological interests, then it is implausible to prevent spoiling countless biological interests of others. Varner cited John Passmore’s passage to define biological interest: “the Jainist principle [of avoiding harm to all living things]… is far too strong. This is the more obvious now that we are aware of the minute living organisms which everywhere surround us. In breathing, in drinking, in eating, in excreting, we kill. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Philosophy: Animal Rights
This paper seeks to defend animal rights against Cohen’s argument that animals have absolutely no rights. Cohen puts forth the argument that animals have absolutely no rights. According to Cohen, to have a right one must be able to make moral demands and be part of a moral community. Only humans have the capability to perceive the moral consequences of their actions, and are reasonably aware of what the effects are to animals or other human beings. He bases his argument from this perspective citing their nature that they lack the capacity to judge moral situations like human beings do. This…
4 pages (1004 words)
Animal Rights Essay
The abolitionist side present the view that animals have a right not to be property. The utilitarian philosophy focuses on animal suffering as they are denied their rights (Regan 34). This paper will defend the rights of animals which is against Cohen argument. It will also look at the positions taken by Singer and Reagan. Carl Cohen is a professor of philosophy. He is well known for his prominent contribution in philosophy. Carl argues that animals have no rights. He says that, animals are not part of a community of moral agents. He continues to mention that animals are in capable of…
4 pages (1004 words)
All Animal Rights Are Equal
This is similar to what Martin Luther King Jr. argued for when he said that people should be judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin. Singer also argues that just because there exists certain factual differences between groups of people (i.e., women are generally physically weaker than men), that this doesn’t justify “any difference in the amount of consideration we give to their needs and interests” (1977). Singer then relates racism and sexism to a concept known as speciesism. Since racism means that a person believes their race is better than…
3 pages (753 words)
Critical Review Essay on an Article About Animal Rights
Animal rights violators have argued that not all living things have equal rights, and that humans are superior to the others. They state that human beings have the rights while the other living things, especially animals, have rights only in the right view of the human being responsible. Reagan accounts for the need to have animal rights on the following arguments and sets of theories. First, the violators base their argument on the contractionism theory, where the human beings are said to have signed a voluntary contract to ensure rights on themselves and close persons. The rights also cover…
3 pages (753 words)
Animal Rights
This particular proposal pertains to a research paper; however, it is also meant to serve as a clarion call to humankind as a means to reignite the moral compass that has been lost and focus their attention on the moral harm that is being done to animals with respect to this industrialized slaughter and inhumane treatment. At the end of the day, the fact remains that we share a planet with these creatures and are ultimately related to them as life forms that share our planet Earth. As such, the two opposing views that people share with regards to this topic hinge upon the level of rights that…
3 pages (753 words)
Philosophical Reconstruction
It is almost certainly a good wager that these issues are linked to each other, which certainly are connected to each other. In the First Meditation, Descartes arrives at an inference that whether he is reasoning or questioning, his mind must be present in order to perform such actions, primarily of questioning or contemplating. Hence, he is completely sure of the reality and existence of his own mind. In the Second Meditation, Descartes inaugurates to tackle the characteristic and nature of his own mind, as well as the control that the mind possesses as long as he completely perceives a thing…
3 pages (753 words)