You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Compare and contrast the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant
Pages 4 (1004 words)
(student's name) (professor's name) (date of submission) Compare and contrast the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant as outlined in chapter 9. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each of thespositions? Which one do you believe is the most likely to be correct?…
Man should be oriented by entities in his or her environment of the definition of what is morally good or not. However, if one should ask, what makes an ethical person? What are the characteristics that make him a good person? Aristotle and Kant’s ethical theories have laid out arguments claiming man’s ethics. However, there are significant ideas that make one theory triumph over the other. Aristotle and Kant speak of the highest good that man can do to society and his own – one that is not to be done just for the sake of being called ethical, getting material possessions or pleasing comments in exchange for it. It is done because it is “good in itself” (Johnson). Both also speak of happiness as ends of being virtuous. However, according to Aristotle, a virtuous life leading to happiness is not achieved without the possession of additional goods as well. A life perceived to be perfect by many, a life with wealth, power, acquaintances, and a physique highly appreciated by everyone. With this life also comes good upbringing, and good habits. Without these things, man will have the difficulty of reaching a virtuous status. Aristotle insists that it is necessary to have these desirable things to be able to reach happiness. In a negative light, this is unfair for those who are born without much fortune. ...
Not exactly what you need?