Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Describe and critically assess Epicurus’s argument that we are not harmed by our own death. (Note, the question asks you about Epicurus’s argument, not Lucretius’ argument.) - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Ph.D.
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

Nobody knows from where we come and where we go after death. Science and technology has developed a lot and we are able to explore even outer universe at present…

Extract of sample
Describe and critically assess Epicurus’s argument that we are not harmed by our own death. (Note, the question asks you about Epicurus’s argument, not Lucretius’ argument.)

Majority of the people approaches their end of life situations with lot of concerns and discomfort because of the uncertainty about the life after death. At the same time many others accept death with pleasure and dignity. Epicurus was ancient Greek philosopher who argued that the worries about death are meaningless. In his opinion, since as long as we exist, death is not with us, but when death comes, then we do not exist". This paper critically analyses the arguments of Epicurus with respect to life, death, pleasure pain etc.
“Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist” (Epicurus quotes, n. d). The above argument seems to be logical when we analyse it in a layman’s point of view. In other words, there is no point in worrying about something which may happen in future. Human lives in present and therefore past and future may not be significant in his life. What happened in the past and what is going to happen in future are unimportant when we consider what is taking place at present. Moreover it is unwise to sacrifice the pleasure in present life for attaining future glory or happiness.
At the same time, when we analyse Epicurus’s argument in depth, we may face many other questions. We have to answer the mind-body problem clearly before supporting or opposing Epicurus’s argument. It is a fact that human body is driven by a force or energy called mind or soul. Even science has no doubt about the existence of mind or soul in the body of human. Science already proved that in order to perform certain works, force or energy is required. In other words, in order to make the human body functional, mind or soul in necessary. In other words, mind or soul is the driving force of human body which is an accepted scientific fact. If that is correct, the question of what happens to mind or soul after death is ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Ontological argument
Objectives: 1. Elaboration of the famous doctrine of Ontological Argument in the light of the philosophies elaborated by the ancient early Christian scholar St. Anselm, eminent philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650), and his successor philosopher Nietzsche. 2. Evaluation of Descartes’ hypothesis and its impact on the future philosophic theories 3. To analyze whether Descartes’ doctrine was certainly the revolt against his contemporary religious and philosophical beliefs, or he imitated the footprints of his predecessors while articulating his rationalism 4. Significance of his theoretical…
10 pages (2510 words)
argument
God’s existence, Cosmological reasons Someone ensures the universe is in harmony. The earth revolves around the sun. The sun firmly stays comfortably in its preset place, the center of a nine planet solar system. The solar system shows that each of the nine planets do not collide against each other. The Milky Way is composed of many stars, comets, and other celestial objects. Humans cannot reach out and rearrange how the universe moves. Someone, who is God, is holding all these majestic works of art together (Viney 151). No one can say that the planets magically fell into place. No one can…
3 pages (753 words)
Argument
Descartes argues that the connection between mind and body is a wholly arbitrary without regard to the laws of physics; for instance he demonstrates that a particle striking another will move in a direction that is determined by the angle of the first particle. In contrary, in the human body, there is no connection between the physical sensations and the ensuing mental reaction; he argues that hunger pangs; for instance, have no direct connection to the reaction they provoke (Desire to eat) and can just as well produce a desire to sleep or drink (Descartes 54). In modern day, cognitive…
3 pages (753 words)
on Socrates’ argument in The Crito is actually an argument developed by each PHI 101 student that explicates and evaluates Socrates’ argument in The Crito. S
More importantly, Socrates emphasized in his argument against Crito that he had to follow the law. The first premise of the argument of Socrates is, “If a citizen actively or tacitly accepts the benefits of the States Laws, then that citizen agrees to abide by all those Laws.” The second premise is, “Socrates actively accepted the benefits of the States Laws. The conclusion is, “Therefore, Socrates must obey the Laws and command to drink hemlock rather than flee Athens.” Although Socrates’ argument sounds theoretically possible, the problems with the two premises as well as his…
4 pages (1004 words)