You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Two Opposing Perspectives on Egoism of Nietsche and Kierkegaard
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Two Opposing Perspectives on Egoism Friedrich Nietzsche’ Gay Science No. 304 and Soren Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling are two written works that bear essential disagreements on the aspect of egoism. The points of contention are relevant because these are actually the very same issues that continue to shape man’s perspectives on ethics and moralities.
Nietzsche, on the other hand, might not have explicitly mentioned the atheistic foundation of his argument in his statement in Gay Science No. 304 but it is clear that he insisted that man should not be controlled by any rule or principle that restrains him from doing what he wants. Apparently, Nietzsche and Kierkegaard also differed in their views when it comes to their treatment of the ego or the individual. For Nietzsche, the individual is supreme and it is only by being so that he frees himself from the clutches of any entity that could hinder his struggle to achieve happiness. Rules that are imposed on him that tend to impede his freedom of movements must, therefore, be removed or repudiated. Kierkegaard, on the other hand, insisted that man should always consider the existence of a higher entity, God. Kierkegaard argued that man is governed by the rules of the Supreme Being and because of this there are limits to his freedom. However, it is necessary to discuss each of the key statements made by both modern philosophers in a more profound manner. The result of such discussion should clarify the opposing perspectives regarding egoism. No. ...
Not exactly what you need?