It was early in 1984, Investigator Jenny Stracner received a tip that a certain person of suspicion, by the name of Greenwood, may be involved in narcotics trafficking. Stracner got a further tip from an informant that a load of illegal drugs was on its way to Greenwood’s residence in Laguna Beach, CA. …
Let us write or edit the research paper on your topic
"US Supreme Court Case: California v. Greenwood Challenges the Fourth Amendment Privacy of Search and Seizure Argued January 1988, Decided May 16, 1988"
with a personal 20% discount.
It was noted that these heavy vehicles only remained at the residence for a short period of time, which raised suspicions. In order to investigate these complaints, surveillance of the Greenwood’s home was necessary. Observations were made of several heavy vehicles making late evening and early morning stops in front of the residence. Stracner was able to follow one of the vehicles to another residence that had been the target of another investigation for trafficking of narcotics.
It wasn’t until April that Stracner had collected enough evidence to prompt a request that the neighborhoods regular trash collectors pick up the plastic bags that Greenwood left on the curb. She further asked him to turn the bags over to her taking much care not to mix the contents with any garbage from other houses. The trash collector proceeded to do as Stracner instructed and turned the designated bags over to her. Officer Stracner then searched the garbage in the bags and found items that were pertinent to narcotics use. She then conveyed the information
that she had found within the trash in order to obtain a warrant to search Greenwood’s home. When the warrant was served at Greenwood’s home, both suspects were present from both residences. They discovered quantities of Cocaine and Hashish during the search of the home. Both suspects were arrested on felony narcotics charges.
The police received further reports of late night visits to Greenwood’s house. On May 4, 1984 Investigator Robert Rahaeuser again obtained garbage from the regular trash collector at Greenwood’s home in the same manner as Stracner. ...
Cite this document
(“US Supreme Court Case: California v. Greenwood Challenges the Fourth Research Paper - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/471492-us-supreme-court-case-california-v-greenwood-challenges-the-fourth-amendment-privacy-of-search-and-seizure-argued-january-1988-decided-may-16-1988
(US Supreme Court Case: California V. Greenwood Challenges the Fourth Research Paper - 1)
“US Supreme Court Case: California V. Greenwood Challenges the Fourth Research Paper - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/471492-us-supreme-court-case-california-v-greenwood-challenges-the-fourth-amendment-privacy-of-search-and-seizure-argued-january-1988-decided-may-16-1988.
This is accomplished by barring any evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s protection from use at trial. Like other amendments that constitute the Bill of rights, it was written and ratified to protect they citizenry against overweening government, but none of those amendments are self-enforcing.
No warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (Levy 1995, p. 162) The fourth amendment was adopted in response to the tendencies of police officers to abuse their search and seizure responsibilities during the colonial period.
The provisions of the amendment require the judicial authorities’ warrant for the police officials or authorities to search over a personal property. This amendment was introduced to prevent the officials from the misuse of writ of assistance, a type of general search warrant in the States.
The United States legal system is no different from other legal systems of the world as it has also gone through a number of reforms and amendments. The Investor Words (2011) explains that an amendment is “a change or addition to a legal document which, when properly signed, has the same legal power as the original document.” Years of such legal hassle and tussle has resulted in a law known as the search and seizure law in the United States.
This observance of this constitutional right gains greater significance if the government interest sought to be served by the administrative decision is lacking in urgency and importance. In this discussion, a brief account of the facts of the case is presented, followed by a discussion of the qualification of the case for judicial review pursuant to the ripeness, standing, exhaustion of remedies, and primary jurisdiction.
1927 U.S. Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell Abstract Buck v Bell, the notorious judgment of 1927 justified Virginia’s sterilization law authorizing compulsory sterilization of those whose off-springs were genetically pre-disposed to inherit their mental retardation and such other mental disabilities.
I agree with the Supreme court's assertion that capital punishment for minors is unconstitutionally cruel for minors; in this particular case, they outlawed the death penalty for those who are younger than sixteen at the time of crime. I would not be discussing my opinion on death penalty as a form of punishment at all (that would merit a different set of arguments), but rather my dissent for death penalty as a just and appropriate punishment for juveniles.
Since its enactment, rules have been made regarding the amendment and the most important rule is the warrant rule.
The Fourth Amendment is a change that was made to the constitution of the United Sates of America and
Hulteen 1). The matter in controversy is clear, if the employer does not give an employee full pension benefit by excluding the time of pregnancy leave on the ground that when the employee took pregnancy leave, the PDA
Any ruling made by the court is not subject to re-interpretation or subsequent contravention by any other legal system in the US. Within the scope of its mandate, US Supreme Court have passed landmark rulings on
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic US Supreme Court Case: California v. Greenwood Challenges the Fourth Amendment Privacy of Search and Seizure Argued January 1988, Decided May 16, 1988 for FREE!