You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Kant's Response to Hume's Skepticism
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Running head: Kant's response to Hume's skepticism Kant's response to Hume's skepticism Customer Inserts His/her Name Customer Inserts Grade Course Customer Inserts Tutor’s Name 18, October, 2011 Outline A. Introduction B. Theory of Divine Pre-formation C.
Another problem that Kant had to content with was the general partition of causal labor between God and created organisms. The main question he faced during his time was the relationship between the causal activity and action of God, considered as the primeval creator and conserver of the world. Kant acknowledged the position that a theory of God’s causal role in the natural course of nature was a precondition of any rational metaphysics of extraordinary intercessions. His personal contribution of this role was influenced by his engagement with three contending theories of divine causation (Nash, 1999, p.4). The first theory, known as occasionalism, postulates that God is exclusively responsible for the existence of beings. According to this theory, God uses his own power and finite substances to create effects in harmony with his own diktat. The second theory of divine causation is known as conservationism. According to this theory, divine activity is restricted to God’s act in preserving created organisms. These protected organisms are viewed as capable of producing their own powers without any extra divine action. The third theory of divine causation is known as concurrence. It concurs with both occasionalism and conservationism that finite beings exclusively depend on God’s creative and preserving action for their survival (Nash, 1999, p.6). ...
Not exactly what you need?