Support positions such as logistics, medical, intelligence, and administrative are also not allowed to be filled by women when in combat sectored zones. Although women are unofficially fulfilling these positions on a regular basis in Afghanistan and Iraq, they are not allowed to be assigned positions that “regularly collocate with ground combat units” (McSally, 2011). Through being banned from these types of positions, women are impeded on progress through their military careers, unable to gain rank through experience in combat situations and therefore unable to be given promotions due to inexperience in these levels of military duty. According to Fenner and DeYoung (2001), “Most of the jobs that remain closed to women are in specialties that the Services consider likely to engage enemy forces in direct combat (or that serve in close proximity to those that do) and those in which members run a higher risk of capture” (p. 3). There are a great number of reasons why this policy remains in effect. The first reason given by Fenner and DeYoung (2001) is that there is a resistance by men to the idea of women in combat. Military men feel their own combat capabilities will be compromised if women are allowed to participate in ground missions. The public is uncomfortable with the consequences of women being captured in combat situations. As well, the dynamic of combat, capture, and imprisonment changes when women are brought into the equation. The second argument presented by Fenner and DeYoung is associated to the first in that these social issues that arise with women in combat have and will affect military readiness when faced with an action that needs a military response. The roles become clouded and too much effort is taken away from other problems in focusing on who and how roles should be fulfilled. The first argument that is proposed suggests that women present a change in the dynamic of combat. This change affects the way in which men face the enemy and the way in which the enemy response is interpreted. The International Debate Education Association (2009) reports that only about 200 women per year can meet the physical requirements that are defined for men, thus integrating that few women into the combat zones, allowing for gender differences and the accommodations that must be made for having women in the combat zones is not justified. In addition, the added pressure on men to both watch each other in a fraternal culture complicated by the social imperative to take care of women through a still active sense of chivalry would further impede the focus needed to engage in successful combat. Placing women in combat areas puts an unneeded pressure on men already in a complex and difficult position. The second aspect of that first argument is that women are more vulnerable in situations where capture is a possibility than are men. The capture of women in combat situations puts added pressure on the men who are captured with them as they are considered to be more vulnerable to torture and the elements of capture than are men. Whether or not women are more vulnerable than men is immaterial, but the perception of women being more vulnerable is enough to be a serious distraction to men who are in a precarious and difficult situation (Fenner and DeYoung 2001). The threat put to a woman is more difficult to endure for men in this situation than is that put on men when witnessing one of their brothers being put to the test. The first
Women in combat positions: Women should be respected as women, not because they can emulate being a man Women are currently barred from serving in more than 220,000 positions in the United States military. This is due to policy that was revised 17 years ago in which women are barred from serving in infantry positions, special forces, tanks, combat engineering and other specialized ground combat positions…
But in recent decades, roles based on gender have increasingly withered on the vine. This has happened to such an extent that in some armies women now fight in combat situations. Proponents of these policies say that this is the ultimate form of equality, and that every women should have the right to fight and die for the country that they love.
Men are considered to be limited in their conversations to sport, cars and women only. Women are considered idle and vain, with conversations centered only around fashion, looks and gossip. At the best, women talk about their children. It seems that no intelligent conversation is possible with them either.
In the long course of military has an institution, the inclusion of women in the operations of the institution has been a long heated debate. Should women be allowed? Given that democracy has been a dominant political thought in the society nowadays, there is now a need to change the perception of people towards women in the military.
Contemporary Perspectives on Women in the Workplace [Name] [University] “Sometimes equality means treating people the same, despite their differences and sometimes it means treating them as equals by accommodating their differences”. Discuss this statement by Abella with reference to remedies offered by Agocs, Burr and Somerset or in any other readings studied in the course.
The data to be presented suggests nothing which is isolated or an aberration; quite the contrary, the data suggests rather forcefully and rather comprehensively that women exposed to combat both directly and indirectly suffer far more than their male counterparts.
In the past, the role of women in military affairs was minor and insignificant: they performed functions of nurses or worked for national defense. As feminist movement grew stronger, the voices for equal military opportunities for both sexes grew louder. As a result, in the twentieth century women were allowed enlist in the United States military as soldiers having equal opportunities with men - another evidence of strong connection between the army and society1.
Nevertheless, literature and world history contains the outstanding personalities of those women who were both wise and magnificent and governed the whole countries, keeping in their hands the fates of nations.
In the present essay, the author is going to compare three outstanding imaginary women from myths and literature - Athena from Homer's Odyssey, queen Dido in the 'Aeneid' by Virgil and Margot from 'The Gate to Women's Country' by Sheri Tepper.
These studies hold the view that women are stopped at mid-level positions with little chances of progressing further and comparatively lesser pay than men. Though there had been increasing efforts being put in to address this issue, yet statistics show that the results of these efforts are minimal and the discriminations in different ways still exist.
This appears to be becoming very accurate inside the military, where much opinion is that women must be given the chance to serve in fighting arms situations. Women should be capable to hold combat sites because, even though physical strength is a significant concern, the military still requires the cleverness that women can produce.
Companies have skirted with the laws and showcased a few isolated incidents which gave the perception that they were moving full speed ahead with equality, when in actuality they were pacifying the authorities and the public.
10 pages (2500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Women in combat positions: Women should be respected as women, not because they can emulate being a man for FREE!