Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Download 0
The Problem of Scepticism Name The Problem of Scepticism Bertrand Russell writes, “Philosophy, if it cannot answer so many questions as we could wish, has at least the power of asking questions which increase the interest of the world, and show the strangeness and wonder lying just below the surface even in the commonest things of daily life.” Scepticism refers to doubt; it occurs when a person questions anything that he hears or sees and does not believe it immediately…

Introduction

This paper helps to provide an insight into the problem that doubting knowledge poses on the average human being and how to deal with the same by using postulated theories laid down by philosophers. The problem of scepticism may be divided into ‘what’ can be known by a person because every individual has a certain amount of knowledge about plenty of things and most people presume a great amount of things from the implications of the situation at hand. Some of these facts may seem to be so true to a person that anyone doubting them would be doing a very pointless job. For example, one writes with a pen on a paper; this is a very common aspect of daily living and it is not possible to be sceptic about such a statement because it is quite obvious that a pen is an instrument one uses to write on paper. However, it may so be understood that just because most people believe in a certain aspect of life, it may not actually be true. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Philosophy Essay 2
This paper seeks to analyze Karl Marx view of capitalism and the major criticism of the system by Karl Marx and other individuals. Capitalism refers to the economic system that is open to new firms and ideas thus resulting to more innovation. One of the major aspects that led to the support of the capitalism by Marx is that it leads to economic efficiency due to the fact that the principles of…
Assignment Handout for Essay 2:critical exposition of an argument
Exposition Aquinas’ cosmological argument begins with an objection that concludes that God does not exist, and this is followed by the contention that there is no need to suppose God’s existence because everything is simply human reason or will. However, Aquinas quotes from the Book of Exodus in the Bible a statement that contradicts the first two conclusions. He then supports such…
Analytical Essay 2
Plotinus and his apprentice Porphyry get credited as the founders of Neo-Platonism. This paper will compare and contrast the characterization of God in the summa theologica and the neo-Platonist view. Both the summa theologica and neo-Platonism account for the existence of a superior being or God. In the summa theological, Aquinas advances arguments that seek to establish and prove God’s…
exam 2
This particular approach is useful to understand due to fact that it has often been referred to as the primal case of the ends justifying the means. This is of course due to the fact that happiness or utility cannot be determined until the action or actions that are intended to evoke such a utility had been performed and can be measured. Many within the field of philosophy have noted that…
The Theaetetus
Theaetetus suggests a second definition of knowledge in which he outlines that knowledge is true belief. Protagoras understandably pursued to preserve the reality of sense perception. # 1) Explain Protagoras' position in your own words Protagoras makes a philosophical statement regarding the structure of reality. Protagoras proposes that knowledge is nothing but perception. The definition of…
essay
These concepts are a fundamental part of knowledge that share different meanings (Lawhead 1-80).Priori knowledge is a process of gathering knowledge by way of performing those activities that may relate to gathering information from the physical world. However, it has been argued that it does not involve any scientific methods or practical experiences in this system (Lawhead 1-80). Posteriori…
assignment 2
Intuitively this can happen, but the evidence presented does not warrant that such would lead to the kind of seemingly dramatic downturn in the quality of the relationship between Lindsey and Malik, as described. The literature describes this fallacy as the Slippery slope fallacy which is a fallacy where the evidence to make a given conclusion is not sufficient. Here there may be an exaggeration…