Non-Human Animals

Non-Human Animals Term Paper example
College
Term Paper
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Name of the Student: Name of the Institution: Course: Course Instructor: Non-Human Animals Rene Descartes (1596-1650) every so often titled “the father of modern philosophy” designed the opinion that human being is conspicuously dissimilar from other creatures and the rest of the usual all God's creatures…

Introduction

He finishes it off with the fact that nonhuman wildlife can be regarded as no more than machineries with chunks brought together in complex ways. Centered on Descartes’ underlying principle, human beings have a very little accountability to other natures or the natural world, unless their behavior has an emotional impact on other humans. (Hergenhahn, 2005, pp. 164). Rene Descartes, seemingly believed that wildlife were, as a matter of fact, vague from nonliving objects in that animals were not emotional —they were purely not creatures who were sensible, had individual and perceptual mindfulness, or were able to suffer pain and misery. As a consequence, they were not animations who had happiness; that is, they did not have favorites, needs, or wishes (Wilsher, 2010). La Mettrie suspected Descartes’s thoughts on God were a veil for his true feelings and to keep himself safe from persecution. In actuality, La Mettrie was of the opinion that Descartes believed humans to be automated like machines and all other non-human creatures (including animals). Descartes presented his thoughts on God and soul as such that they would match with the thoughts of the clergy. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible?
My opinion extends to other human activities that put harm animal which are not necessary, such as poaching or game hunting or animal fights. There is a fundamental moral principle which permits us to share a kind of equal treatment that concerns all human beings and with every kind of differences that exist between and every one of us. I believe that this moral code is not only limited to human…
Are all animals created equal?
Given this premise, he shows that the setting in which the animals work from must be considered standpoint before these animals are subjected to acts that is proven detrimental and harsh that will give rise to pain and pleasure (Singer 1989, p. 149). This provides that there must be a certain understanding of the act being done towards them like slaughtering for consumption purposes and…
Non-human Animals Can Be Agents of Morality
From de Waal’s account, it is evident that animals especially chimpanzees can actually be moral agents. The basic concept in understanding the ability of animals to be moral agents is the evaluation of how human morality is distinguished from chimpanzee “morality”. De Waal envisages that human morality develops from the morality of our common ancestors. Morality emerges gradually, becoming…
Philopsphy paper
This paper applies these two theories of ethics on particular concrete cases. The cases are, keeping/breaking a promise, abortion, and Euthanasia. As sources of information, two books are used: Practical Ethics, by Peter Singer, and Ground Work of the Metaphysics of Morals, by Emmanuel Kant. Before applying the two ethical theories to the above cases, it is important to first give an overview of…
equality for animals
The principle of equality can be considered as one of the major concepts used by Singer in his article i.e. ‘equality for animals’. The concept was supported with different notions which define that the term equality should encompass the practice of a clear understanding of the nature along with its principles concerning equal consideration of interests. Moreover, Singer has also mentioned…
Equality for Animals?
In case of animals the mental or psychological aspect do not play much role. This differentiation has not been made because the animal equality is based mainly on physical torment aspect. He author mentions the point “not have interests because it cannot suffer” but here it is not clear as to what kind of interest he is talking of. The explanation provided in this context is ambiguous because…
Kant and Mill Ideologies
Indeed, Mill claims that people should value the principle of utility as a tool that derives secondary moral principles, which promote general happiness. The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of…