Non-Human Animals - Term Paper Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Non-Human Animals

He finishes it off with the fact that nonhuman wildlife can be regarded as no more than machineries with chunks brought together in complex ways. Centered on Descartes’ underlying principle, human beings have a very little accountability to other natures or the natural world, unless their behavior has an emotional impact on other humans. (Hergenhahn, 2005, pp. 164). Rene Descartes, seemingly believed that wildlife were, as a matter of fact, vague from nonliving objects in that animals were not emotional —they were purely not creatures who were sensible, had individual and perceptual mindfulness, or were able to suffer pain and misery. As a consequence, they were not animations who had happiness; that is, they did not have favorites, needs, or wishes (Wilsher, 2010). La Mettrie suspected Descartes’s thoughts on God were a veil for his true feelings and to keep himself safe from persecution. In actuality, La Mettrie was of the opinion that Descartes believed humans to be automated like machines and all other non-human creatures (including animals). Descartes presented his thoughts on God and soul as such that they would match with the thoughts of the clergy. ...
Download paper

Summary

Name of the Student: Name of the Institution: Course: Course Instructor: Non-Human Animals Rene Descartes (1596-1650) every so often titled “the father of modern philosophy” designed the opinion that human being is conspicuously dissimilar from other creatures and the rest of the usual all God's creatures…
Author : xferry

Related Essays

Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible?
My opinion extends to other human activities that put harm animal which are not necessary, such as poaching or game hunting or animal fights. There is a fundamental moral principle which permits us to share a kind of equal treatment that concerns all human beings and with every kind of differences that exist between and every one of us. I believe that this moral code is not only limited to human beings, but also to other living sentient beings in our environment. I believe that respect for life even extends to non-human living organisms and that animals have every right to be treated with much...
9 pages (2259 words) Essay
Are all animals created equal?
Given this premise, he shows that the setting in which the animals work from must be considered standpoint before these animals are subjected to acts that is proven detrimental and harsh that will give rise to pain and pleasure (Singer 1989, p. 149). This provides that there must be a certain understanding of the act being done towards them like slaughtering for consumption purposes and experimentation in the medical. These acts invariably highlight that humans are superior from other species and they have the freedom to do such act since these animals are means to an end (Steinbock 1978, p....
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Non-human Animals Can Be Agents of Morality
From de Waal’s account, it is evident that animals especially chimpanzees can actually be moral agents. The basic concept in understanding the ability of animals to be moral agents is the evaluation of how human morality is distinguished from chimpanzee “morality”. De Waal envisages that human morality develops from the morality of our common ancestors. Morality emerges gradually, becoming more complex over time, but human morality is different in degree, not in kind, to the “morality” of other primates. Philip Kitcher, Christine Korsgaard, and Peter Singer in their book Philosophers...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Philopsphy paper
This paper applies these two theories of ethics on particular concrete cases. The cases are, keeping/breaking a promise, abortion, and Euthanasia. As sources of information, two books are used: Practical Ethics, by Peter Singer, and Ground Work of the Metaphysics of Morals, by Emmanuel Kant. Before applying the two ethical theories to the above cases, it is important to first give an overview of each of the theories. To begin with, the utilitarian theory of ethics is an end based theory. In other words, in determining the morality of an action, the proponents of utilitarian theory will focus...
5 pages (1255 words) Term Paper
equality for animals
The principle of equality can be considered as one of the major concepts used by Singer in his article i.e. ‘equality for animals’. The concept was supported with different notions which define that the term equality should encompass the practice of a clear understanding of the nature along with its principles concerning equal consideration of interests. Moreover, Singer has also mentioned that the concept of principle of equality denotes that individual concerns for others should be prioritized equally irrespective of their ability or what they are like. Singer has also used the concept...
12 pages (3012 words) Essay
Equality for Animals?
In case of animals the mental or psychological aspect do not play much role. This differentiation has not been made because the animal equality is based mainly on physical torment aspect. He author mentions the point “not have interests because it cannot suffer” but here it is not clear as to what kind of interest he is talking of. The explanation provided in this context is ambiguous because talking of experiments on mice, it is essential in human interests. The author has not talked of conflict of interests or what decision should be taken when there is such a conflict. What interest can...
11 pages (2761 words) Essay
Kant and Mill Ideologies
Indeed, Mill claims that people should value the principle of utility as a tool that derives secondary moral principles, which promote general happiness. The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure. As such, we can judge people’s actions based on the secondary principles, which promote general happiness. On the other hand, Immanuel Kant defines the fundamental principle of morality as the...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!