StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Plato versus Nehamas & Kant versus Hume - Essay Example

Free

Extract of sample
Plato versus Nehamas & Kant versus Hume

Majority of critics in art and literature have not only been enthralled by Plato’s views on the ‘Republic’ but also questioned on the validity of mimesis in art. Other critics have opted to understand the reliability of Plato’s mimesis by criticizing his works. In his work on ‘Republic’, part three, Plato banishes some of the imitations used by Aristotle but agrees to their use in other ways of imitation of good men in the society. Contradictory, in ‘Republic 10’ he agrees to Socrates banishment of imitation of the ideal society.
Nehamas believes that Plato is unable to take a general stand on inclusion of mimesis in his works. At times, Plato is seen to imitate actions of people, sounds, dramatic events, and looks of people to bring out his messages and at times, he criticizes mimesis. Nehamas does not believe in imitation adding value to an ideal city. He argues that Plato may have lifted ideas of what he saw in pictures and translated these pictures. He gives an example of a settee which may be actual or just a fallacy.
Nehamas idea of mimesis as just a misleading notion of getting readers to study various works of art holds much evidence. Mimesis may not really be valid and reliable way of conveying themes in the society. Kant versus Hume Immanuel Kant is one of the philosophers that attempted to come up with the best criteria to judgment of taste. He brings into the open the ideas of universality and subjectivity. Kant argues that taste is judged on the basis of one’s sensation towards

Related Essays

Ethics (David Hume and Kant)
Kant professes a secular and universal kind of morality while Hume's argument is highly subjective and could be very problematic in its applications. Hume has observed that it is our modern philosophers who define morality on pure reason and in contrast to that our ancient thinkers have considered “morals as deriving their existence from taste and sentiment”
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
Kant and Hume on Morality
Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” is an attempt in this direction while Hume’s “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals” justifies his views. Both pieces of work are contrasted below. Kant’s concepts are discussed first followed by Hume’s concepts.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Kant vs. Hume on Moral Reasoning
Kant preached the categorical imperative, in which he stated that the principles of Universality and Reversibility (both of which will be discussed ahead in the paper) should guide human reasoning and behavior. On the other hand Hume gave precedence to human feelings over any abstract relations of rules of Universality and Reversibility as the guiding principles of human actions.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Badiou's Versus Levina's Works
The works of both the two philosophers seek to represent different perceptions on the subject of ethics but there is no way does Badiou’s work advance our understanding of ethics beyond the works of Levina or vice – versa. In my view, both the two thinkers present two different sides of the same coin and their philosophies still end up explaining the same phenomena (Barker 64).
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Utilitarian versus Retributivist Views
Justification may also refer to the validity of the punishment that is being exacted on the offender as necessary and commensurate with the extent of the offense. Because of the seriousness of the concept of punishment, moral philosophy has attempted to rationalize punishment and justification, with two main theories being the most dominant: utilitarian and retributive theory.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Communism versus Capitalism
Eventually, the final vote among the seven men present settled on monarchy as the preferred form of government. The common political philosophy between these three forms of government is that all of them are based on a similar social order. Society constitutes several classes based on the economic status of its members.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Kant and plato
It is important to underscore that, for Kant, understanding are not derived from experience. It even precedes the latter because understanding supposedly makes experience possible. In Prolegomena, Kant pointed out that the
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Essay about Kant, Hume or Aristotle
On the other hand Hume gave precedence to human feelings over any abstract relations of rules of Universality and Reversibility as the guiding principles of human actions. In
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Philosophy and art/plato, nehamas/hume/kant
Majority of critics in art and literature have not only been enthralled by Plato’s views on the ‘Republic’ but also questioned on the validity of mimesis in art. Other critics have opted to understand the
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Scepticism versus Human Nature: David Hume, Enquiry concerning Human Understanding
Human nature is therefore best placed to provide knowledge than skepticism. Hume questioned Descartes’ work which showed that any attempt to base knowledge on sensory
1 pages (250 words) Essay
an object or person. This feeling is driven by one’s liking or disliking of someone or something. One’s taste will determine whether they describe something as beautiful or ugly. At times, people make a judgment on taste based on the influence from other sources, not from their own free will. Kant’s ideology needs a lot of improvement especially in terms of influence as a factor for making sensible judgments. It is important to highlight the characteristic of gratification on which verdicts on beauty are founded. Beauty cannot be discussed autonomously of metaphysical factors about realism. The main question is whether beauty incorporates both features of being ugly and beautiful. Kant questions that if beauty does not on ugly and beautiful two features, then could beauty be discussed under maudlin basis? Kant believes that there is a form of pleasure in beauty that comes about from representation of an object but not mere gratification of seeing the object. He continues to argue that there is no pleasure in beauty but an intended purpose towards an object. Basically, Kant says that there is no contentment or desire in beauty. Taste, according to Kant, claims general validity. Some people may term something as beautiful, but that claim does not agree to opinions of other people. Can we equivocate this to there being no taste in the universe? If each person has their own taste, then there is no unanimous agreement to what is beautiful and what is not beautiful. There is no universal claim to the elements that describe the beauty and whose idea may be right or wrong. Conclusively, Kant argues that there is no correct manner to describing beauty. People may have their own reasons towards considering beauty; others may be shocked by a piece of art and term it beautiful amongst others. Therefore, beauty is relative according to Kant's ideologies. Hume regards taste as a result of an agreement between collective decisions and factual critics that hold much evidence. Beauty, therefore, lays in the arguments brought forward bay a person. Though it may be difficult to decode the best taste, Hume argues that coming

Summary

In his work of the ‘Republic’, Plato is renowned for his extensive use of mimesis. His works have elicited a lot of controversial discussions on the validity and importance of mimesis in works of art…
Author : faustino53
Plato versus Nehamas & Kant versus Hume essay example
Read Text Preview
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation