Someone properly planned our bodies and then did his best in order to realize this plan. This someone is God. I am Christian and believe in Jesus Christ as my Savior. However, it is not the only reason why I am sure that everything on the Planet is created by God. I am not the only person who has this point of view. There are also numerous arguments that will prove the existence of God. For instance, cosmos is a magnificent result of someone’s thorough work. It is not just a theory; this point of view was proved by one of the medieval philosophers – Saint Thomas Aquinas. This philosopher gave birth to cosmological arguments that prove the existence of God. It turns out that people only need to look deeper at the world around them, especially at cosmos. This will help them to see themselves the arguments that prove the existence of God. Aquinas managed to prove that reason and faith are closely connected with each other. Thus, he suggested several arguments to prove that everything was created by God. All of them are based on one major idea. It is the one form contingency. Saint Thomas Aquinas applied this argument to demonstrate that everything in the world is dependent upon something. Nothing can exist separately. The world looks like some properly planned interdependent system of various elements that need each other. Moreover, the universe that is the major field of all those elements lacks some ultimate reality for its existence. This reality can be only God. There are three different variants of the above-mentioned argument (causality, motion, contingency), but the meaning is the same – the structure of the universe proves the existence of God. Another medieval thinker – Saint Anselm – suggested the ontological argument for God’s existence. It also proves the existence of God. The major thought given by the thinker concerning the above-mentioned argument is that in general the existence is not “necessary” but “contingent”. According to Saint Anselm’s point of view the whole universe is “contingent”; it is not necessary to exist. The only one who is necessary is God. Although, this point of view is highly debatable; it still is a good way to prove that God is an essential part of human life. He exists, He created people and He is necessary for normal life. From my perspective, this explanation included by Chaffee in his book is one of the best ways to explain that God exists (Chaffee, 335). There are three more arguments proving that God exists. They are the following ones: 1) the argument from design, 2) the first cause argument and 3) the moral argument. The first one is frequently called “the teleological argument”. The major point of this argument is based on the thought that universe is ordered. Everything in the universe is done so that the earth has life. If at least something was changed, there would be no life in the whole world. So, God kept in mind a proper order for the universe when he was creating people, planets and all other things that are around us. The first cause argument is closely connected with the existence of the universe. The latter began to exist much time ago. However, nothing can appear from nothing. Someone created the universe. Moreover, nobody except God is able to do that. Only He can create such huge and serious things as the universe as he has neither end nor beginning and it is not difficult for him
Professor Name Philosophy 6 November 2011 Can We Prove the Existence of God? People differ and that is why there are various points of view upon the things around them. It is necessary to stress that the existence of God is not an exclusion from this rule…
“Before his time, philosophy had been dominated by the method of Scholasticism, which was entirely based on comparing and contrasting the views of recognized authorities” (Vincent 2003). A great deal of Descartes’ thoughts and ideas was based on information learned through the senses yet rejected the notion the senses contributed to proper philosophical analysis.
Rationalists and Empiricists have both argued in their own fashion in supporting the existence of God. Differences in their views are based on the extent of emphasis each side lays on human sense experience. Empiricists claim the existence of God based on information and knowledge gathered through sense faculties endowed to humans.
Introduction The debate for the existence or non-existence of God as an all knowing, all powerful Supreme Being has existed ever since the beginning of time, or as others would say, the evolution of man as a thinking, reasoning being. Rather than accepting all things around him, man began to question his existence ever since the philosopher stated: “I think, therefore I am”.
598). Atheism is therefore the converse of theism by totally debunking the idea of theistic views concerning the existence of God. Hence, the idea concerning the argument from evil holds the claims that God is omnipotent, God is all good and evil exists cannot all be true at the same time.
But, it is equally true that sudden deaths do take place, when a perfectly healthy person departs leaving all his near and dear ones behind. Today we can proudly proclaim that we've conquered the force of gravity with space missions, but the mystery of dying star and black holes has still kept us searching for answers; we do take pride in the fact that we've developed early warning systems for weather updates, but we are still nowhere near to avoid all those cloud bursts and natural calamities; we've indeed also developed a huge pile of nuclear arsenal having intercontinental ramifications, but are we more safer And of course we're far ahead of the times when cancer and tuberculosis used to
Regarded as the father of modern philosophy, Descartes’ proof for God’s existence is characterized by a rational inquiry, purporting to prove through the faculty of reason that God must necessarily exist. The author then argues that while the contribution of Descartes’ philosophy is without doubt undeniably significant, there are important problems that become evident upon the examination of his thoughts.
en a God that had created it; teleological, which is when people believe that God exist because of an order and the details of a creation, such as human lives; and the moral argument, which states that there could be no morality without God. Out of these four arguments, the one