Kant's Categorical Imperative

Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Kant’s Categorical Imperative Categorical imperative is a term that originates from a philosopher in Germany by the name of Immanuel Kant. It is a term he uses to assign to anything he considers to be unconditional, essential, and a complete moral procedure.


His argument is that the intention behind an act is what makes the action moral rather the consequences of the act. He also suggests that a person’s action as a result of his goodwill is a moral action. Kant’s moral theory emphasizes more on the duty rather than the consequences of an action. This property makes scholars to term Kantian ethics as deontological (Kant, p.56). Deontological ethics claim that some actions are intrinsically wrong while others are intrinsically right. According to Kant, this concept is an order that requires the obedience of the subordinates to it as if it is a moral duty. The subordinate’s obedience to the duty is a requirement that does not regard individual desires. This enables the creation of an unconditional society with the basis of reason and free will. The function of categorical imperatives is to act as a test for the principles of our actions and check whether they are moral or not. The principle behind these categorical imperatives is the principle of fair play (Kant, p.84). The idea of fair play means that a person cannot make an exception for himself for his own personal gains. According to Kant, humans can act according to the categorical imperative by taking three forms of action. The philosopher argues that humans should act only according to the adages which they can will to be universal laws. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?