We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

What is utilitarianism - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Brandt and Williams are great philosophers of utiliatarianism. Williams suggested that consequentialism has been popular and perceived to be rational in various societies due to a false impression and refusal of non-consequentialist ideologies…
Download paper
What is utilitarianism
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
What is utilitarianism

Although, Williams fails to provide an alternative moral hypothesis, the philosopher successfully investigated how utilitarianism and its backers root for untenable beliefs about what rational actions entail. On the other hand, Brandt emphasizes that when evaluating the repercussions of the value of an ethical belief, the society should go beyond mere appraisal of the gains of following set etiquettes and instead embrace selective fulfillment of the requirements. This can only be achieved by leveraging the benefits and negative consequences of such rules: for instance, one should appreciate remorse and other dangers linked to interiorizing fundamental prohibitions in the society. This paper analyzes the ethical arguments presented in “A Critique of Utilitarianism” by Williams and “Some Merits of One Form of Rule Utilitarianism,” by Bernard Brandt in their respective articles, in order to establish whose utilitarian philosophy is more effective in today’s society. Overview of the philosophers’ perceptions Williams provides an exceptional theory, which defines positive action, based on whether it results in a favorable situation triggers a fundamental conflict between an individual’s ethical capacities and that supposedly right action.
It is notable that in an effort to employ utilitarianism in balancing and sustaining practicality as an ethical theory, Williams points out the surreptitious incorporation of moral feelings that are not purely utilitarian. For meticulous observation, this confusion often triggers the realization of the weaknesses of a consequentialist approach to understanding satisfactory morality and leadership. By taking into consideration an individual’s ethical inclinations only when they are in tandem with utility implies that there could be a more profound failure to appreciate that such beliefs are often exhibited by the agent’s individual projects and obligations. Therefore, to realize an objective threshold of moral practices, utilitarianism eventually soils an individual’s honor by turning right action immaterial to those initiatives and obligations. Whereas Williams (606-622) perceives that the grounds for the effectiveness of consequentialist moral revolve around to immoral thoughts about moral impacts of the eventualities, Brandt suggests morality is based on moral actions. Brandt argument on utilitarianism contradicts Williams, especially on his suggestion that that the latter’s jump into the impacts of actions occasions the weakening of the individual’s moral standing (Brandt 590-592). In view of this, Williams’ perception of ‘commitment’ as dictated by the party confronted by an ethical dilemma should be based on the actions and not just the consequences. Additionally, in case there is need to maintain honor between individual behavior and minor order projects, it is important to recognize the fact that modern moral theories such as the ones based on consequentialist ideology, this cannot be embedded to individual actions. It is, however, important to recognize that both Williams and Brandt philosophies on ethical actions imply that a certain application is greatly shaped by the actions of an autonomous moral cause. Significance of the ethical goals and actions Williams (607-615) acknowledges that individuals in the modern world are unaware of the connection between human objectives and behavior. Further, the theorist’s argument brings into focus some fundamental issues such as whether individuals take steps for the sole aim of accomplishing particular objectives. And if so, after realizing an intended objective, it is unclear whether the outcome may inspire the pursuing other successive goals in life, because in general, goals in life are ... Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“What is utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/50037-comparative-essay-on-utilitarianism
(What Is Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“What Is Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/50037-comparative-essay-on-utilitarianism.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
What is Utilitarianism What are two objections to this view
What is Utilitarianism?  What are two objections to this view?  What is a response that can be given to each of the objections?  In the end, should Utilitarianism be accepted as the correct view of morality?   Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept which had its origin in Great Britain.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Utility the good to be capitalized on has been distinct by a variety of thinkers as contentment or pleasure though preference utilitarian like Peter Singer describes it as the pleasure of fondness.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Utilitarianism is based on the “general happiness principle” or the “principle of utility” (PU). Actions are moral if they promote general happiness, and they are wrong if they will reduce general happiness. Among several actions, the right action promotes
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Mill's Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism therefore serves as the basis on which the morality of the actions could be judged in a given society. Mill discusses the idea of Bentham and his view of utilitarianism
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
The doctrine of utilitarianism rest on the worldview of maximizing benefits for all members of the society. As a result, the theory views actions from its impacts on involved stakeholders.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Through utilitarian ethics, these pertinent issues gain justification and are seen to have great importance to humans (Smith 13). Everyone has a right to work as it is a means to an end
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
It is identified that the Utilitarian views are entirely different from its contemporary philosophical theories of morality. Under certain circumstances, even homicide is justifiable under Utilitarianism. This paper will discuss in what kinds of circumstances
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Liberty and freedom are common terms in the society as people and entities seek autonomy and protection of private rights. Liberty defines a free state in which no external force restricts a subject and while it remains the desire of every person and entity, there exist moral and legal provisions and theories that are inimical to its existence.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
It appears that although both sides of the issue cam be highly criticized, it is also possible to find justification for tortures when applying the principle of Utilitarianism. As one of the most persuasive and influential
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
From this, the two categories of happiness and unhappiness arise: happiness that signifies presence of pleasure and no pain, and unhappiness represent pain without pleasure. Two people known to be the leading
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic What is utilitarianism for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us