My opinion extends to other human activities that put harm animal which are not necessary, such as poaching or game hunting or animal fights. There is a fundamental moral principle which permits us to share a kind of equal treatment that concerns all human beings and with every kind of differences that exist between and every one of us. I believe that this moral code is not only limited to human beings, but also to other living sentient beings in our environment. I believe that respect for life even extends to non-human living organisms and that animals have every right to be treated with much care and equanimity as we do with a fellow human being. Even if non-human animals are lacking superior and complex rational faculties and capabilities compared to humans, their existence is something to be valued and not to be brushed aside so brusquely. If one were to look at it, an average person would rather dismiss the issue of animal rights while not being able to sit down and swallow the problems of racial discrimination. The reason behind this is that people in general, most of the time ignorantly or unintentionally, have speciesism as part of their mindset. Speciesism could be defined as the belief that one kind of species among all other members of the group is more superior to the rest, therefore the rationale for dominance, subjugation or annihilation of the superior specie against the more inferior. In this case, humanity has seen itself at the highest pedestal of the food chain. Singer made this observation on speciesism in this manner: This attitude reflects a popular prejudice against taking the interests of animals seriously - a prejudice no better founded than the prejudice of white slaveowners against taking the interests of their African slaves seriously. It is easy for us to criticise the prejudices of our grandfathers, from which our fathers freed themselves. It is more difficult to distance ourselves from our own views, so that we can dispassionately search for prejudices among the beliefs and values we hold. What is needed now is a willingness to follow the arguments where they lead, without a prior assumption that the issue is not worth our attention (55-56). I would now come to think that if animals were in the same level as human beings, perhaps in the eyes of a Higher Being such as God, animals were and are still the most abused group of organisms on the Earth. Yet, most of us human beings are not too concerned about this because there is either lack of care or concern. It can be said then that the lack of compassion is what kills animals by human hands. I think there is more to that than just a lack of care for life, something that is more logical. For example, If a person were to be asked whether it is better to put a human being or an animal as a test subject for a scientific experiment that could find a cure for a deadly disease and save millions of lives, would it be certain to say that the person would choose another human being to be put under the knife than an animal? Even if the person being asked was an animal lover or animal rights advocate, I most certainly doubt that any psychologically normal person would choose another human being in a heartbeat. People would rather have an animal go under the experimentation instead since it human beings have more attachment and concern for another human being than an animal. I will not be a hypocrite to say that I know any better about this matter. If being asked the same question, I would
Cite this document
(“Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/50236-is-killing-animals-or-making-them-suffer-for-human
(Is Killing Animals , or Making Them Suffer, for Human Ends Morally Essay)
“Is Killing Animals , or Making Them Suffer, for Human Ends Morally Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/50236-is-killing-animals-or-making-them-suffer-for-human.
Cited: 0 times
Is killing animals, or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible? People have always needed animals for various reasons for the sake of either necessity or convenience. I believe animals exist to help humanity survive and get by with life with less hardship as possible…
The bigger portion of Regan’s logic is based on the moral beliefs of human beings that set certain boundaries and pointers of what is right and wrong. Regan makes a comparison between retarded people and animals leading to a conclusion that animals can be also regarded as “beings” which deserve their right being respected.
The argument for equality among beings really isn't one for intelligence, moral capacity, physical strength or other criteria which cannot possibly be equal among species. It isn't even equal among the beings of the human group. There are many people who may be considered human only by virtue of having been born from human parents; certainly nothing else qualifies them.
According to Judith Jarvis Thomson who wrote an article on the defence of abortion; abortion is the termination of pregnancy usually through the removal or expulsion of the foetus or embryo from the uterus. This is mainly as a result of the abortion being induced.
Name Class Instructor Date Indirect Theories and Moral Equality Theories on Kindness to Non-Human Animals According to Immanuel Kant, humans have duties to be kind to animals because these “duties towards animals…are indirect duties towards mankind” ( 64 ).
It should be remembered that the history of cloning is a tedious and tiresome journey with ingenious methods applied. At the Roslyn Institute the successfully cloned a lamb but took 277 tries to finally clone it. Scientists working on the project knew all through their work in progress that once successful Cloning can be a very useful tool if used under the right conditions.
This essay discusses the rights of animals in the modern times. Sadly enough even in the twenty first century, we as humans are not averse to the idea of using live animals for medical research, genetic experimentation, and hunting. As if making concrete jungles upon their natural habitats was not enough we have locked them in zoo's ,made them extinct for their furs and teeth and exploited them for food.The issues regarding animal rights are just one aspect of respect for all the living organisms of Mother Earth.
The interesting thing is that, a single species plays the role of both, the predator and the prey. For example, snakes are predators when they eat rats and become prey when they are eaten by vultures. Similarly, mosquitoes are predators when
? some animals communicate through scents, for instance, something humans do not really do, or can communicate more through their physical posture than humans do. But humans are truly in a league of their own because of symbolic language – the idea that we can connect the
Some of the approaches of gene-therapy include replacing the mutated gene that is responsible for the disease with a healthy gene (Becker, 2000). Another approach entails inserting a new gene in the body in order
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible for FREE!