Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Polictal Phylosophy. What it it? - Term Paper Example

Only on StudentShare
Undergraduate
Term Paper
Philosophy
Pages 9 (2259 words)

Summary

Running head: POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Political Philosophy (name) (course) (professor) (date) Political Philosophy Introduction Most people have varying political philosophies and ideals. Regardless of differences however, most people apply these political philosophies into their daily activities and their perceptions of political, economic, social, and even cultural happenings…

Extract of sample
Polictal Phylosophy. What it it?

This paper shall be a discussion of my personal political philosophy. Specifically, it shall be a discussion of my liberal political philosophy, largely based and supported by John Locke’s philosophy. A discussion of my political philosophy as applied in the Iraqi invasion shall be established by this paper followed by a discussion related to gay marriage. My other political views shall also be considered, as well as the relationship of this philosophy with other political philosophies. Body I have a liberal political philosophy. By this, I mean that I believe in the freedom of the people to decide their own fates within the bounds of law and morality with limited interference from other people, other states, and from the government. I adhere firmly to this philosophy because I believe that man was by nature born free and possessing of these inherent liberties. As such, he is free to decide his destiny and his fate as an individual and as a free person (Gaus, 1983). I also believe that allowing the individuality of people to emerge can help ensure the favorable development of human beings. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Worldview as it Relates to Philosophy
Through experience and education individuals develop these perspectives and implement them as a means of living their daily existence. When considering myself I recognize that my worldview has changed drastically over the course of my life and has been greatly influenced by experience and philosophy. This essay considers my current worldview and the way my past worldview has been influenced and changed through philosophy. Before taking this course my worldview was strongly rooted in religious doctrines. Throughout the formative periods of my life I grew up in an environment that was strictly…
6 pages (1506 words)
Abortion: Is it right or wrong?
To bolster their position, the Churches have the support of pro-life movements and politicians who advocate traditional values. This essay will try to give more concrete ideas on this raging issue. Warren and Don Marquiz To explain the position of Mary Anne Warren, the fetus for her is not a person, and so ending its life is not morally wrong. A person has inner and outer capabilities including self awareness, feelings for self and others, as well psychomotor abilities to express thoughts and feelings through actions and movements of body and limbs. A fetus does not have these, since it…
3 pages (753 words)
Don't change it.
While other philosophers like Rousseau opposed this crucial view of humans by viewing them as cooperative, selfishness and fear are the main reasons why humans harm each other (Rousseau, paragraph 12). Shifting from the evil human image that Hobbes explained, to the well-disposed human image of Rousseau, makes an obvious antagonism between both philosophers. Indeed, both Hobbes and Rousseau wrote about the same points, which are human nature, social contract, and the form of government, but each of them had different explanations to these ideas. In the idea of human nature, Hobbes started by…
4 pages (1004 words)
What does it mean to act morally?
The proposed model adopts theories of Psychological Egoism and Ethical Egoism but it is largely based on the Buddhist philosophy of enlightenment. Analysis on Existing Theories of Moral Philosophy Sense of “morality” occurs naturally in human mind. Pursuing private benefits and ignoring the wellbeing of other living beings are also natural human behaviors. Conflicting mortal forces of “morality” and “immorality” are responsible for a great amount of literature in the human history. Lord Buddha taught 2600 years ago that correctly comprehending these forces is the path way to the…
6 pages (1506 words)
chose one argument and write about it
The second premise is that leaders are irrevocably oppressive since even when they make mistakes in judgment that would be seen to have the opposite effect of advantaging the weak; they are not technically leaders since as a craftsman a leader is infallible therefore when they err they are not actually leaders. He therefore contends that as the case is in all cities, it is considered just to obey the rules, retrospectively made by the strong to be followed by the weak and this is ultimately advantageous to the law’s authors. It is at this point that most proponents’ arguments will depart…
4 pages (1004 words)
chose one argument and write about it
The happiness, however, is subject to fall. This makes the second premise of the argument where Aristotle proclaims that, in the event that the noble happiness disappears, the recovery is a challenge. Happiness, therefore, is a strong virtue that needs consistent and careful observation to limit change to extreme conditions. The authority of academic minds reveals various dilutions that attempt to shift the point of judgment from happiness to experimental proof. In this light, the paper will attempt to examine, these objections to come up with a more preferable conclusion that misjudging…
5 pages (1255 words)
The value system How does it develop
Both philosophers, by using contrasting arguments and ideas, set out to show us "how to live" in society. Socrates was an idealist, and Machiavelli was a pragmatic realist. I will discuss whether it is in fact it is true that philosophy or theory has anything of value to offer in the conduct of politics. Socrates' argument is that philosophy has something of value to politics, but Machiavelli does not completely agree.…
3 pages (753 words)