They have important knowledge and are capable of achieving perfect one. They have the ability to educate the society with the truth due to the fact that they simply love wisdom and even just the thought of having it. They want to learn many things and it does not conceal the fact that indeed they love to acquire much more wisdom and they are more knowledgeable than any other. Regarding this, there are three important questions this essay addresses: Why, according to Plato, are philosophers considered useless by the general public? Why does Plato think that they are (potentially) useful? If the general public thinks that philosophers are useless, can they ever be useful? The metaphor of the ship “Imagine then a fleet or a ship in which there is a captain, who is taller and stronger than any of the crew, but he is a little deaf and has a similar infirmity in sight, and his knowledge of navigation is not much better”1. In this statement, Plato tried to emphasize that someone who is able to lead should definitely has knowledge about everything he or she is doing. It is not just enough to have physical strength just like the captain in the metaphor as having characteristics such as being taller and stronger than any of the crew in the ship, but it is important that someone must be able to have perfect knowledge about its role in order to play it perfectly right in front of the public. Plato did not deny the fact that someone who has the responsibility to lead should have important physical characteristics to ensure strength and possession of ultimate power. However, what he wanted to stress out is the fact that knowledge is important because just like the captain of the ship, the entire vessels should head on to the right direction. In directing the vessel to the right direction, the captain should essentially have important background, experiences or knowledge about navigation. Most importantly, he has the ability to learn which is the thought strongly emphasized by Plato through the use of the body parts associated with learning such as the eyes and ears. Plato emphasized these basic parts of the body as important components in understanding things or everything about in the world. The general public “Now in vessels which are in a state of mutiny and by sailors who are mutineers, how will the true pilot be regarded? Will he not be called by them a prater, a star-gazer, a good-for-nothing?”2. This statement simply illustrates the general public’s treatment towards philosophers. In this statement, Plato regarded the general public as having argumentative attitudes towards correct ideals. It is presented in this situation that the general public has the freedom on how they would show their treatment towards philosophers in line with their role in directing people and leading them towards certain directions. The general public certainly does not want to make agreement with the philosopher when in fact he has the ability to think among any other and has the potential to lead and learn the knowledge about something else. Just like in the case of the captain in the metaphor of the ship in the “The Republic”, although he is definitely has the potential strength to lead the entire crew of the ship, Plato ironically wants to emphasize that someone remarkably needs to have knowledge and the right ideals about everything else as far as moving forward to the right direction is concerned. However, Plato just wanted to emphasize that the general
Introduction As widely known as it is today, philosophy simply means the love for wisdom. What comes to mind when it comes to understanding philosophers is the thought that these are individuals who have strong affinity to wisdom simply because they love having it in the first place…
Plato viewed that some had a better capacity for reason than others, and thus, the more rational individuals ought to be at the top of the social hierarchy because they were 'best suited' for it. By contrast, Rawls viewed inequality not as a biologically determined variable, but as one that was the product of unequal distribution.
The conflicts begin when the mind-level pundits, preachers and mullahs argue. Each one of them is speaking from the level of his spiritual progression and it is but natural that they will not agree with each other. From their levels, they will never be able to!
Many nations have always sought ways and strategies of minimizing the abuse of power including entrusting leadership in the hands of the learned. However, such strategies do not seem to work. Through his book The Republic, Plato, the great thinker presents a potential solution to the abuse of power.
For example, Plato did not defend democracy as the better form of establishing a government, and preferred a number of incarnations such as the monarchical governments. This anti-democratic perception or view as held by some canonical writers seems to be at odds, compared to view by current political philosophers (Michels 518).
Psychological, sociological and spiritual characteristics of the individual are considered. While criticism of the vagueness of her model have been leveled against Neuman, it has been influential in inculcating the ideas of whole patient and preventative care that are now part of mainstream medical training.
In the political realm, philosophy works to establish the values that society lives under. If we understand politics as the question not of who will rule but of what values should rule, it is clear that philosophy is the ultimate form of politics. In this sense, philosophers such as Socrates (469 BCE - 399 BCE) and Niccoló Machiavelli (1469 CE - 1527 CE) claim that politics stems from philosophical theory.
His writings are a call for man to strive towards the establishment of an ideal political world.
Plato was born in Athens, Greece, in 427 B.C. into a family of distinguished pedigree and wealth. Plat’s real name is said to be Aristocles, Plato being a nickname meaning
The aim of the study is the analysis of modern and postmodern ideas. The modernists, such as Picasso, focused on the emotions themselves with little or no reference to the symbols or issues of the times. The postmodernists, such as Marshall, make these symbols and issues key elements of their work, illustrating the emotions these cause.
The aim of this essay is to analyze politics in modern art. Art becomes more significant in the sense that it addresses reality at the same time it encourages people to think and act when faced with events that concern them, the society and their values. The link of the contemporary arts to politics in the United States started during the Vietnam War.
The author states that political ideologies are founded on the normative perspective of politics. Normative questions include such interpretations as to whether social value systems are reflected in political policy or political actors are exercising moral judgments, as aligned with the people’s view of morality, when constructing policy and legislation.
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Plato's ideas of a philosopher and its relevance in modern politics for FREE!