Is Foundationalism or Coherentism the Better Model for the Justification of our Beliefs?

Is Foundationalism or Coherentism the Better Model for the Justification of our Beliefs? Essay example
Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 7 (1757 words)
Download 0
Name: Instructor: Institution: Date: Is Foundationalism or Coherentism the Better Model for the Justification of our Beliefs? Investigate the Arguments on Either Side and evaluate them Foundationalism states that knowledge, as well as justifications, are configured like a building, comprising of a superstructure that respites on a groundwork…

Introduction

The major argument for foundationalism is referred to as the relapse argument. It is an argument from eradication. With regard to each justified conviction, B1, the query takes place of where B1's rationalization emerges from. Whether B1 is not fundamental, it may have to rise from an additional belief, B2. However, B2 can give good reason for B1 simply if B2 is vindicated itself. Whether B2 is fundamental, the justificatory sequence would finish with B2. However, if B2 is not essential, we could do with a further conviction, B3. Whether B3 is not fundamental, we require a fourth conviction, and so forth. Except the resultant regress comes to an end in an essential belief, we obtain two probabilities: the relapse will either circle back to B1 or carry on ad infinitum. In relation to the relapse argument, the two probabilities are deplorable. Consequently, if there are vindicated beliefs, there ought to be fundamental beliefs (Cornman 145). This argument endures from a variety of weaknesses. Initially, we might question whether the substitutes to foundationalism are in actuality deplorable. In the current literature on this topic, we, in fact, find a highly structured justification of the situation that infinitism is indeed the proper resolution to the regress predicament. Nor must circularity be overlooked too swiftly. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Relationship Between Knowledge and Belief. What Role Does Experience and Reason Play in Ensuring our Beliefs Are True
What is important to note here is the underlying significance on the shaping up of beliefs. If these beliefs are not given the room to expand within their entireties, there is little one can do in essence. Similarly, experience and reason have got a due role within the relevant scheme of knowledge and beliefs. Experience comes with an understanding that things can be learned with the passage of…
Justification and Crisis of Modern Science
He clearly understood the Deists and was greatly influenced by the brilliant Unitarians in social concepts. Rene Descartes on the other hand was known to be the vicar of modern science. He initiated a new clear means of thinking about science and philosophy through ignoring all notions centered on supposition or emotional conviction and concurring with the ideas proved by direct observation (Dunn,…
My Ethical System and Its Justification
Divine command is a system where actions are made in accordance with those of a higher being, God, who is all-knowing. In this paper, I describe the ethical system which I ascribe to. Personal Ethical System My ethical system is one by which I live and use to decide which actions are moral or ‘good’. In my opinion, what is good is what allows my conscience to be clear and also what results in…
My Ethical System and Its Justification
Faith is good because it serves as an unseen yet strong force that compels me to reject evil and choose good. Prudence is good, because it helps me become wiser. Justice is good, because it brings harmony to society as it ensures fairness. When everything is fair, resentment and retaliation could hardly win, which results to peace and order, thus making people’s lives happy and contented.…
Philosophical Beliefs Regarding Human Knowledge
Philosophy as a discipline is the art of rationalizing. Rationalizing refers to the art of analyzing on an in depth the premises laid in front of an argument. Through thorough analysis reach out on wisely chosen conclusions and further more solve problems of the community. It needs one to be a critical thinker to be a good philosopher. Critical thinkers are at the highest level of thinking (Mill,…
Philosophy of Epistemology
It is not the task of this essay to offer a total refutation of the Skeptics' claim, rather to analyze arguments which look at the justification for our beliefs. Two such arguments, which have traditionally been in contest with one another, are Foundationalism and Coherentism. The former claims that there are basic, self-evident beliefs which act as a foundation upon which all other beliefs are…
Foundationalism
This essay shall briefly state the concept of 'foundationalism' with an example, and analyze some criticisms against foundationalism. The essay shall argue that foundationalism presents itself as a very weak and debate-able theory of epistemic justification for it to be accepted as plausible. The essay shall cite appropriately from researchers and other works, to support its argument.…