Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Do Humans Cells have rights? - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
College
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 5 (1255 words)

Summary

Name Instructor Task Date Do Human Cells Have Rights? The issue of human cells having rights has come up in light of the medical progress that has led to the possibility of medical practitioners performing procedures that enable the fertilization of the embryos outside the human body…

Extract of sample
Do Humans Cells have rights?

By studying the four theories namely Social contract theory, utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics, one is able to understand the difference in the moral theories and the premises that they are founded on. Explain What Moral Goodness Is According To Social Contract Theory Social contract theory expresses that morality is a set of rules governing behavior that rational people would accept, on the condition that others would accept them as well. Political theorists have defined this as the primary base for the rise of political authority in many communities. Social contract theory is also how an act is classified as morally good or otherwise through consent from the people (Skyrms 59). Interpret What Social Contract Theory Would Imply For The Issue At Hand. The rights of the human cells can only be established or denied by the society. This is by the voting in of laws that may allow the rights of the human cells. This is made through consent of the people and this consent is what makes it right for a researcher to use the human embryos for research. This leads to the argument that the human embryo should be given a chance to life as opposed to the right to life. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Philosophy: Animal Rights
This paper seeks to defend animal rights against Cohen’s argument that animals have absolutely no rights. Cohen puts forth the argument that animals have absolutely no rights. According to Cohen, to have a right one must be able to make moral demands and be part of a moral community. Only humans have the capability to perceive the moral consequences of their actions, and are reasonably aware of what the effects are to animals or other human beings. He bases his argument from this perspective citing their nature that they lack the capacity to judge moral situations like human beings do. This…
4 pages (1004 words)
Animal Rights Essay
The abolitionist side present the view that animals have a right not to be property. The utilitarian philosophy focuses on animal suffering as they are denied their rights (Regan 34). This paper will defend the rights of animals which is against Cohen argument. It will also look at the positions taken by Singer and Reagan. Carl Cohen is a professor of philosophy. He is well known for his prominent contribution in philosophy. Carl argues that animals have no rights. He says that, animals are not part of a community of moral agents. He continues to mention that animals are in capable of…
4 pages (1004 words)
Philosophy: Speciesism in Humans
It would be worth exploring the view points of Peter Singer and Holmes Rolston with regard to the last redwood remaining on this earth and how they would have preferred to deal with this enigma. Speciesism in Humans Peter singer argues that human beings since their beginning have indulged into speciesism – a domineering human behavior over nonhumans and that needs to be condemned. Currently, humans treat nonhuman animals in the same fashion as Blacks were treated in the British rule. Peter argues that suffering is the primary feature that brings all animals on the common platform. He cites…
6 pages (1506 words)
Critical Review Essay on an Article About Animal Rights
Animal rights violators have argued that not all living things have equal rights, and that humans are superior to the others. They state that human beings have the rights while the other living things, especially animals, have rights only in the right view of the human being responsible. Reagan accounts for the need to have animal rights on the following arguments and sets of theories. First, the violators base their argument on the contractionism theory, where the human beings are said to have signed a voluntary contract to ensure rights on themselves and close persons. The rights also cover…
3 pages (753 words)
Excess Embryos and Research
Moreover, based on the absolutist principle, all life has value and that it is always wrong to take such life (West, 2005). These individuals also point out that using excess embryos for human research may lead humanity into a slippery slope, where one small step towards an end would lead to other similar actions where bigger and more undesirable consequences become apparent (West, 2005). Discussion In order to understand this discussion better, it is important to consider and define the parameters of IVF. In vitro fertilization refers to the process of the sperm fertilizing the egg outside…
6 pages (1506 words)
Animal Rights
This particular proposal pertains to a research paper; however, it is also meant to serve as a clarion call to humankind as a means to reignite the moral compass that has been lost and focus their attention on the moral harm that is being done to animals with respect to this industrialized slaughter and inhumane treatment. At the end of the day, the fact remains that we share a planet with these creatures and are ultimately related to them as life forms that share our planet Earth. As such, the two opposing views that people share with regards to this topic hinge upon the level of rights that…
3 pages (753 words)