The setting in which the animals work from must be considered standpoint before these animals are subjected to acts that are proven detrimental and harsh that will give rise to pain and pleasure (Singer 1989, p. 149). This provides that there must be a certain understanding of the act being done towards them like slaughtering for consumption purposes and experimentation in the medical. These acts invariably highlight that humans are superior from other species and they have the freedom to do such act since these animals are means to an end (Steinbock 1978, p. 253). The aforementioned condition shows that in order for equality to be achieved, there must be an elimination of suffering. However, Singer failed to consider that the conditions of suffering, pain and pleasure for animals is not really the same to that of humans since humans have an intrinsic capacity that animals do not have: rational thinking (Steinbock 1978, p. 254). This rational thinking gives way for humans to have a very utilitarian approach on animals (Singer 1989, p. 150). Utilitarianism tries to ensure that humans maximize the things present around them to achieve their needs and desires (Armstrong 2007, p. 2). Given this scenario, there is nothing that appears to be problematic since this only ensures that humans achieve and gain what they need like food for them survive. However, humans, in most cases, failed to understand and appreciate the findings of modern science like the consumption of alternatives to animal meat like soy beans (Singer 1989, p. 152). Since they have failed to recognize the presence of the innovations in the food industry that can mitigate the necessity to slaughter animals, they constantly resort to a very hedonistic nature of things in which the problems rise. There will be constant lavishing of animal meat and it is considered moral for some individuals under a utilitarian perspective. This is indeed true because this has been the convention of human beings for years. The maximization of the utilitarian approach allows them to use it for abuse and do not consider the effects of it.
This paper "Are All Animals Created Equal?" examines the philosophical problem of equality in relation to animals. The writer claims that humans and animals must coexist as it is ultimately the best thing that most of us can have since harmony exists…
"I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" (Luther-King & King, 2007) At first glance, the message drawn from a line of Martin Luther's King's renowned "I have a Dream" speech seems straightforward and one-dimensional.
It seems that he sees these as a violation of human philosophy concerning the invalidity of discrimination. The error in Singer’s argument is that he groups all animals into one category of “non-human” and states that they need to be protected from human discrimination, which neglects to address the issue of animals violating the hypothetical quality and rights of one another.
Although Thomas Jefferson at that time, had slaves, the meaning of his words cannot be interpreted based on these actions alone. His other writings also have to be considered and it is apparent from his other writings that he was man who was very much filled with moral difficulties in relation to the practice of slavery.
There are several people who firmly believe that animals have no rights and they can be used for personal benefit. This mindset has to be worked upon if we are to restore parity, it is a very upsetting sight to see a dog get kicked but if we treat the dog like our property, no one will ever dare to damage our property.
Singer also points out that equality does not necessarily mean that everyone should be treated identically, but it does mean that everyone should be treated with the same consideration. In other words, although humans may not be equal in their capacities, it doesn’t mean that just because someone is a woman or black that they are therefore less intelligent or less capable than a white male.
Quality problems arise from underuse of services, overuse of services and misuse of some services. Most of the services that are offered by the health care services are underused especially the prevention services. This has led to the rise of preventable health complications which add to the overall cost of offering healthcare services.
According to the author, the liberation movement should expand our moral horizons and open up a reinterpretation of the basic moral principle of equality. The author attempts to maintain that equal rights to animals cannot be denied on the basis of the argument that humans and nonhumans are different and should not have equal rights.
These individuals believe that any form of suicide or early death is a violation of religious principles and should accordingly be prohibited. I personally take strong issue with this formulation of medical ethics. I believe like government, medical
Stuart Mill draws our attention towards the basis of the gender discrimination. Our society has the system of jobs in various sectors that is totally biased in the favor of men. In every company, you will find women working under men who are holding important positions in the management.
The article by Peter Singer provides an analysis of the issue of morality and equality of all living animals. Singer makes the argument that “equality does not depend on intelligence, moral capacity, physical strength, or similar matter” and claims that “the interests of every being affected by an action are to be taken into account.
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Are All Animals Created Equal for FREE!