Does the (apparently) Value-Laden Nature of Science give us Reason to Doubt the Objectivity and Reliability of Science?

Does the (apparently) Value-Laden Nature of Science give us Reason to Doubt the Objectivity and Reliability of Science? Essay example
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Philosophy of Science: Does the (apparently) value-laden nature of science give us reason to doubt the objectivity and reliability of science? In this essay I argue, presenting evidence from required reading, that science is indeed value-laden, which contrary to historically entrenched beliefs and expectations, serves to enhance the objectivity, reliability and validity of scientific enterprise…


In the paragraphs that follow I try to identify salient arguments put forward by leading scientists representative of the epistemology under review. Science may be defined as the human endeavour to explore, investigate and understand the physical universe. Scientific method used to gain knowledge of natural phenomena includes observation, forming hypotheses or theories, conducting experiments to test hypotheses, and drawing conclusions in accepting, modifying, or rejecting hypotheses. In antiquity, philosophy encompassed all knowledge. In modern times, science has become the repository of almost all knowledge, completely epistemic and objective. Physics, from Newton’s Laws, to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity led to many technological advances, and continues to be the paradigmatic science given exact mathematical expression. Until quite recently, scientists believed that they were engaging in a value-free, positivistic and Cartesian enterprise untainted by nonepistemic values. Gregory Mikkelson introduces the subject of ‘Values in Ecology’ by pointing to the historical link between modern science and colonialism, an unlikely outcome given the much vaunted scientific criterion of impartial objectivity. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

The Nature of Descartes' Program of Radical Doubt and the Reason He Engages in This Program
As it is however, no significant degree of being radical may be detected, yet for the nature of doubt which Descartes presented, the philosophically radical part of his program is perceived on casting doubt upon ‘senses’ which has frequently been neglected. At this stage, he had come to express hence - “All that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and…
6 pages (1506 words)
Science Is Value Neutral?
It is the belief thatt he universe is governed by rational laws, and that through careful experimentation we can observe them. The problem, however, is that science is not simply about understanding, because each new breakthrough of understanding can also lead to a practical breakthrough that affects how we live our lives. These effects are one of the major reasons people ascribe value to science.…
3 pages (753 words)
As a result, there have been conflicts as to the reliability of science or religion as sources of knowledge, which in turn affects people’s acquisition of new knowledge. In view of this, the aim of this paper is to show how faith in science and religion affect people’s acquisition of new knowledge. Knowledge can be pursued through religion or science, though they both use different…
4 pages (1004 words)
Philosophy of Science Essay
Karl Popper on the other hand was the totalitarian and unadventurous proponent of positivism. Karl and Popper were the contemporaries and criticized each other’s work. The comparison on the philosophies of Kuhn and Popper following attributes are taken into consideration: 1. Differentiation between science and non science Popper opined that science is a method of trial and error. It is a method…
4 pages (1004 words)
Why does Ruse say that Creationism should not be understood as a Science
The two have not had fecund collaboration in history except the uneasy relationship philosophy, religion and science had during the medieval period. Called the dark ages, it shows that combining religion, philosophy and science does little good, if any. The burning of Giordano Bruno at the stake for pushing the envelope past what the church accepted underscores the uneasy marriage that was…
3 pages (753 words)
evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia
In these two books, he expresses and defends his ideas on the nature of scientific methods, concluding that there are no ground rules on governing scientific methods. He opposed the idea of having a single rigid scientific process to which all scientific research is carried out with the argument that this would make science predictable thus denying it the opportunity to evolve (Feyerabend 2000).…
8 pages (2008 words)
Explicate Descartes dream argument, taking care to lay out what it calls into doubt and the reason it does. How might you respon
In Descartes’ dream argument, he casts several doubts about the things he knew. First, he does not believe that all the information received by our senses is accurate. After his revelation, he undertook an intellectual rebirth. His first prompt was to throw away everything he knew and believed in before proving himself that they were satisfactory. He concluded that it would be difficult to…
3 pages (753 words)