Views on Just War Introduction The thought of war coming to one’s mind is always chaotic and bloody. Bravery is often manifested in war regardless of its purpose and goals, and that it happens for a variety of reasons. However, despite the violence associated with war, it is often argued that there is in fact, a just war or accepted ethically and by law due to its purpose and goals…
There were a variety of reasons as to why war can occur, and this may involve personal or judicial reasons. The reasons as to coming up with war need further justification as to its reasons, and goals. The majority root for all the debates is that these reasons must coincide and fit with the nature of war. However, one seemingly ideal question that needs focus is the existence of just war itself. The World War 2 is a definite example to examine and justify the existence of just war. World War 2 The World War 2 began on September 1, 1939, and it lasted for six years. This war was known to be one of the most dreadful wars the world has ever known. The war sparked when Germany took hold of Poland without permission. This then motivated Britain and France to join the war and fight against Germany. Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa later joined the war within a week from the start of war (World War 2.net, n.d.). The causes of World War 2 in summary started when Germany took over Poland. However, there were underlying reasons before it came to the point where Germany invaded Poland. The known underlying causes of World War 2 were “Treaty of Versailles, Hitler’s Actions, Failure of Appeasement, and Failure of the League of Nations” (History On the Net.com, 2011). The “Treaty of Versailles was about the deals that were discussed as to how Germany should be held liable for World War 1” peace (History On the Net.com, 2011). The deals were not served as fair and just for the Germans, and they had Adolf Hitler to fight for their rights. “Adolf Hitler’s actions” particularly invading countries and not keeping his word with regard to peace and integrity made its way to becoming one of the complex reasons of war. The “failure of appeasement” was about deals that failed to provide the demands of Germans considering that Adolf Hitler’s actions were acceptable. “Failure of the Leagues of Nations” was about the failure of the League, and the member countries to enhance world peace (History On the Net.com, 2011). These then were the basis as to how World War 2 was born, and a few of the many justifications that World War 2 was in fact, a just war due to the policies and logical reasons involved. Laws on War: Jus ad Bellum The laws on war are primarily focused on justifying the validity of war or the existence of a just war. “Jus ad bellum” is a title that provides and considers the legitimacy of a war or how far would a war be considered just. This originated from the “Charter of the United Nations” under article 2. This article states the involvement of states that use force to gain control and personal interest (Nabulsi, n.d.). The 6 Categories of Just War under Jus ad bellum The justification on the legitimacy of just war should fit on the 6 categories of the jus ad bellum to be able to declare a war that is just or acceptable. Below are the categories and there association to World War 2 justification, and existence of just war. A war must have a valid cause. One of the many examples would be “defence of others from aggressive attack” (Lacewing, n.d.). The World War 2 was highlighted primarily because of the defense of other countries to Poland when Germany took over them. This was unannounced, and several innocent lives were sacrificed. A war must have the “ ...
Cite this document
(“Views on Just War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/52318-1-is-there-such-a-thing-as-a-just-war-in-your-answer-critically-examine-the-standard-criteria-for-a-just-war-as-set-out-in-we
(Views on Just War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Views on Just War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/52318-1-is-there-such-a-thing-as-a-just-war-in-your-answer-critically-examine-the-standard-criteria-for-a-just-war-as-set-out-in-we.
This means that the military cannot live and operate in isolation but then should have all its operations in the interest of the nigger society. One issue of such importance to society about the work and operations of the military is Just War. Content According to the BBC Ethics Guide (2011), “A war is only just if it is fought for a reason that is justified, and that carries sufficient moral weight.” Just War goes beyond just a military practice to be encompassed as a theory.
Orend defines war as intentional, actual, and widespread-armed strife between antagonistic political communities. The war in the views of Orend does cover intercommunity, robbery or terrorism fights. However, many cases of war have been witnessed in many nations (a group of people sharing similar beliefs).
Bush has been criticized for faulty course of action since the tragic incident of 9/11, which also became the cause for his downfall. President Obama was then selected as president from a Democratic party in opposition to John McCain, the Republican nominee for presidency.
It is widely agreed upon that a nuclear war, if it happens, would produce this result. The threat that stronger nations pose to the sovereignty of smaller nations is also one of the greatest problems that faces mankind at this point of time in history. For the purpose of acquiring resources and also for the age-old purpose of conversions, countries may turn loose aggression on countries that may be unable to defend themselves from such an onslaught.
On the other hand, if the business of organization is such that decision making is meant to be early as in nursing field, then employees are managed in such a way that they are given less authority and less participation in decision making of the organization.
Theories relating to just war have always tried distinguish between the right and wrong in these power games. The terminological conclusions of this distinction are the terms ‘just war’ and ‘terrorism’. “Terrorism is the random killing of innocent people, in the hope of creating pervasive fear” (Walzer, 2006).
ions within a social context, JWT applies the same kind of prescriptions and values to states and militaries that it does to individuals within their respective communities. Thus, in the world community, it is expected that when two entities go to war with each other, they will
This is a clear indication that no modern war can be just in participation and form (Norman, 2007, pp.1-5).
Quite a large number of people argue that modern wars, like other wars waged before, are natural, and as tribal
The author of the text emphasizes that "Just War" involves extermination of numerous people especially those not involved whereas the global states lightly assume those affected were only untargeted casualties. The author also believes, a remedy ought to give both warring states a neutral ground.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Views on Just War for FREE!