You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
A Distinction Between Practical Anthropology And Moral Philosophy
Pages 6 (1506 words)
The difference between Kant’s moral philosophy and the empirical moral philosophy is that the later is biased towards the posteriori principles or those that are garnered through the observations and experiences of human beings…
The works of Kant (1728-1804), a German philosopher, are mostly drawn from the observations and his own ideas on the nature of humans. The major emphasis of this philosopher is on the priori or pure part of the moral philosophy. He strongly believes that in the operation of moral philosophy, the major determinant is inherent in reason and is also revealed through it. The difference between Kant’s moral philosophy and the empirical moral philosophy is that the later is biased towards the posteriori principles or those that are garnered through the observations and experiences of human beings. Kant, using this distinction, referred to the empirical moral philosophy as moral anthropology. He claimed that while moral anthropology indicates to us the actions of people, it cannot indicate how they ought to act.
The basis of finding the supreme moral principle should not be on the descriptive part but on the authoritative normative principle that is most fundamental in deciding human actions. Kant further claims that morality commands human beings to be natural using the priori principles but never through the posteriori ones. ...
Not exactly what you need?