You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Kant and the Unlicensed Engineer
Pages 6 (1506 words)
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the case of the unlicensed engineer using the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. I will provide a detailed description of Kant’s deontological ethics as well as his retributivist theory of punishment.
Finally I will argue that despite some shortcoming, Kant’s theory is the best for use in professional life. Kant’s theory of morality is categorized as deontological, which means its based in the idea that you have the moral duty to always pursue or avoid certain actions. Deontological ethics are often described in opposition to consequentialist ethics, which evaluate the morality of an action entirely on its consequences. A consequentialist will maintain that regardless of the act committed, if it results in an overall benefit to everyone involved, that act is permissible, and if it results in a greater amount of harm than good, then it is not permissible. In contrast a deontologist evaluates the morality of an act strictly on the act itself. Even if following your moral duty results in dire consequences, you must still strictly adhere to it. Kant’s particular version of deontological ethics is based in what he calls the Categorical Imperative. This is a system used to determine which actions are your duty to carry out or avoid. The system works as follows: to decide whether an act is moral first formulate a rule that summarizes your reason for committing the act. ...
Not exactly what you need?