James Argument on the Belief in God in The Will to Believe and Pascal's Wager

James Argument on the Belief in God in The Will to Believe and Pascal
College
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Name: Class: Date: James Argument on the Belief in God in the Will to Believe and Pascal's Wager Pascal Wager is among philosophers of theology with most famous arguments relating to belief in God. Wager puts forward a strong argument on theoretical grounds for belief in God…

Introduction

Therefore, Pascal concludes that any rational being has a duty to believe in God to attain the infinite happiness. However, this argument by Wager raises many critics from philosophers who view the argument as lacking probability in the life of humanity and more so related to belief. Pascal’s argument is viewed as an extraordinary power. The proponents of this argument explain that even though Wager’s argument might be taken as false and a probability taken on this argument, on at the end we might be wrong and the argument might be true after all. Therefore, no matter how small the probability, Pascal’s argument should be accepted as true according to this argument. However, William James is a serious critic of this argument by Pascal and tries to discredit the hypothesis and the conclusion by Pascal regarding believing in God. For James, belief involves a will to choose among possible options and such an option has to have concrete evidence and our faith in most cases is responsible for shaping future outcomes. Rather than taking forced options that might end up being false, James stresses on being indifferent. The assertion by James is therefore more skeptical one that does not offer concrete proofs as compared to Pascal’s. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.
His argument, however, was wholly rejected by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s suggestion was that there is no way that mere mortals can conceive what God’s nature is, and thus we surely cannot conceive God like Anselm has said we can (Oppy 122-3). Therefore, this argument can be used only by the ones who can understand the true essence of God and that cannot be anyone but God Himself. David Hume was…
Philosophy quizes
The need for self-realization is the reason behind birth, thus the need for a chariot, which is the earthly body. Once one's desires are fulfilled and begins to love nothing else but the “Self”, one reaches the state of Nirvana, making rebirth unnecessary. 3. In “Questions of King Milinda,” monk Nagasena discusses the state of non-self - that there is no inherent and permanent essence to…
Pascal's Wager
It should be noted that it is not the intent of this paper to judge Pascal’s wager in an attempt to evoke an overall belief or disbelief in god; rather, the purpose of this analysis is to weight Pascal’s wager on the scales of rational and philosophical thought. On the surface, Pascal’s wager includes the very elements of simplicity that those considering philosophical questions crave.…
Argument for God using the Design argument
The world was created in a way that human beings have no control or clue of the occurrence or existence of different phenomena. This essay is going to explore and affirm that God exists through the argument for design. Thesis Statement: The coordination and the intricate way in which human beings live by purpose suggest the existence of an intelligent designer. Overview Our lives in the world are…
Kant's Argument for the existence of God
Therefore, the arguments about God’s existence come in distinct forms in that some are drawn on reason and moral philosophy. There are many questions concerning how people believe that there exist a supreme spiritual being. In real sense, the supreme spiritual being exists. Throughout human history, they have always thought of the existence of God. There is sufficient evidence to belief and…
Argument on Mackie's analysis on existence of God
On the other hand, theists continue to defend the stance that God exists and can, in fact, coexist with evil. Mackie challenged theist notions by seeking to demonstrate the invalidity and lack of persuasiveness inherent in regard to the presence of God. The basis of Mackie’s argument is the provision of atheist criticisms towards theistic assertions regarding the issue of evil in the world…
Dialogues concerning Natural Religion: Hume’s Evidentialist objection to belief in God
In addition, I will provide a discussion on why Clark and Plantinga believe that the classical foundationalist must reject classical foundationalist. Finally, I will provide a discussion on the various beliefs that Plantinga thinks are properly basic. These discussions will provide a vista to bring forth arguments on Plantinga and Clark’s arguments against classical foundationalism. The main…