Master morality and slave morality Nietzsche’s views about morality often highlight the clash between master morality and slave morality and the history of morals is the conflicts of these two moral viewpoints. Nietzsche had identified the presence of these two morals which are common among the higher civilizations…
In master morality “bad” stands for “lowly”, “despicable” and it refers to people who are inconsequential and cowardly. In Nietzsche’s opinion, “bad” always concerns the idea of what is useful and never concentrates what is grant or great. On the other hand, Nietzsche established his ideology of good and bad based on persons and their actions. The doctrine of master morality constitutes the theory that the master generates value. Nietzsche introduces slave morality as a counter treatment against master morality and mentions that slave morality begins when Master morality is rejected. Slave morality always promotes the ‘nay- saying’ people and their attitudes. If the characteristics of a person are ‘evil,’ the better thing is its absence in a person’s life. In contrasting Master or noble morality, slave morality at all times encourages unassuming nature and patience. In addition, it is obvious that slave morality give confidence, the human virtues such as kindness, sympathy and humility among the people. Analyzing Nietzsche’s views about good and bad, one can come across some distinctions in their acceptance. In his view, good originates from self- confirmation and it is considered as the celebration of a person’s greatness, virtue and power. ‘Good’ stands for glorious and proud status of human mind whereas, bad always reveals lowly or despicable which enriches the concept what is useful, rather than what is great or virtue. The encounter between good and bad permits one to identify a hierarchy of people, the noble and great masters or aristocracy and common folk. Mater morality differentiates good and bad which underline the role of good and bad in human life. Good and noble person has kept the status of ‘fullness’ through his entire life and helps his fellow being with the help of distinct qualities like wealth, power and ability. ‘Bad’ always disquiets irrelevance and forwardness among the people and it forces one to act as more cowardice, aggressive and irrelevant when good and noble person exposed his gratitude. Unlike the encounter between good and bad, good and evil is differentiated by slave morality. Simon May observes that “What is evil is absolutely negative and must be annulled if the good is to endure” (May, 2011, p.196). In this juncture, one can see that good concentrates human glory and proud. Whenever a person lost his master morality, he would express some signs of humility, sympathy and patience. ‘Evil’ strictly challenges the perceptible happiness of a noble man and it protest the noble or master morality through upholding humbleness and extreme patience, Nietzsche observes that ‘good’ requires the higher status of master morality among the people while, ‘evil’ demands to enhance the idea that morality is equivalent for all. Examining the attitude of Roman rulers towards slaves, Nietzsche introduced some innovative concepts about values. Nietzsche had established a new concept named ‘ressentiment’ which provided a new strategy of control, foster cowardice and the power for the compensatory pleasures. Bill Reynolds identifies that “Ressentiment is a state of repressed feeling and desire, which becomes generative of values” (Reynolds, n.d.). At present, ressentiment became an effective strategy for “ ...
Cite this document
(“Master Morality And Slave Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/53876-master-morality-and-slave-morality
(Master Morality And Slave Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Master Morality And Slave Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/53876-master-morality-and-slave-morality.
In this essay I shall explain how Nietzsche arrived at such a claim. I shall argue that despite Nietzsche’s criticisms on the dogmas of Christian morality, values, and tradition, he extols principles that contribute to the emancipation of the individual self.
Thus, it has veered away from what it was to actually live and how it failed to represent the virtues of life, favoring a morality which was for the meek, humble, and lowly. It created a morality of the herd. This brings us to how Nietzsche came up with the two different types of moralities.
His influence still remains substantial both within and beyond philosophy especially in nihilism, postmodernism, as well as existentialism. His style of doing things and the radical questioning of the objectivity of the truths has led to commentary and interpretation, mostly within the continental tradition.
Indeed, in Section 10 of his First Treatise on the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche brings the term “ressentiment” to the reader’s attention. As one might guess, the term is originally French but is a cognate with English in that it means “resentment”.
Notably, people have different perceptions concerning various situations. It is the interpretation of things that determines how a person responds and thus the basis of morality in the society. Friedrich Nietzsche poses the idea that our present morality evolved from ancient time.
The Genealogy of Morality believes that there are two different moral codes in the world that are good and evil and good and bad. The first dimension comes from the early conquerors and people who believed that their control over wealth and power or success was good and the other extreme was having nothing and being poor which meant being in a ‘bad’ situation.
Explain and justify your view. Nietzsche’s view against philosophy and reason derives from his views of the current western philosophical tradition, as organized around a conception of philosophy deriving from Socrates. He was against philosophy and reason in the Socratic sense, which viewed philosophy, which aims for knowledge of timeless and non-empirical truths, including truths about the good and the right; thus, knowledge of the truth is the overriding value in philosophy and is also essential for living well.
According to Nietzsche, master morality is based on strength and what is strong is good while that which is weak is wrong, therefore, those who have master morality are strong and have created their own morality and they judge themselves. For master morality, bad is seen as a failure and a defeat as well as loss of power (Solomon132).
However, I do know that I will do my best to achieve what realistic goals I can set for myself or those that have been set by professionals in my field of study as moral guidelines.
In fact, I feel that those
Different philosophers started proposing their theories and ideas on different aspects of man. Out of all these thinkers, Rousseau and Nietzsche have contributed a great deal in this connection. In this paper we will
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Master Morality And Slave Morality for FREE!