Name: University: Course: Tutor: Date: Is there an afterlife and what would be required for an afterlife Personal identity is best looked on as “all that makes one who he or she is. (Baillie 1993).” In this case, it might be his/her body, mind, memories, personalities, or anything else…
Death has been considered the only certain thing in life. There is even consensus to the effect that a number of changes take place during the transition from life to death, which therefore follows that changes making up life are distinct from those making up survival. In distinguishing these two varying changes, we can give a number of personal identity criteria through time to explain death (Baillie, 1993). First, we can use a criterion that has been popularized by Hume, Plato and a multiplicity of world religions. According to this criterion, human beings are either immaterial souls or even pure egos (Hume, 1739). This can be construed to mean that human beings possess the physical bodies only on a contingent basis and therefore not a necessity as far as living (in this life and the afterlife) is concerned. This being the case therefore, it is proper to argue that human being continues to live even after death. If anything their bodies are contingent and not necessarily a must-have in their living and especially their afterlife (Ayer, 2006). The second criterion has to do with the claim that a human being has two distinct components namely a body and a mind. This criterion, the so-called Cartesian Dualism, named so in honor of Rene Descartes, claim that the two components namely, the material body and the immaterial mind are distinct and therefore can exist separately. In fact it goes on to claim that the immaterial mind can exist separately from the material body particularly when the material body dies. This idea has however failed to convince many people because of a number of obvious faults in the reasoning behind it. For instance, is it logical for an immaterial mind to effect any change in a material body? This is the main problem that this idea has been unable to address, a problem that has since assumed the name “the problem of interactionism” (Levine, 1989). The reasons that Hume advance in arguing that death is survivable are convincing in whichever one looks at them. For instance, I am convinced that there must be another component that leaves the body to rot, otherwise what happened when a human being is resurrected by a supernatural being. Does he/she resurrect with another body or the same body which at the time must have long decomposed. This clearly demonstrates just how probable a human being might possess a separate invisible component that is left behind after his/her fresh dies and subsequently decomposes (Jerome, 1966). In opposing the idea of an afterlife, Hume argues that every creature’s ability is always proportionate to the task ahead of it. This is best demonstrated in a Hare’s or an Antelope’s ability to out-run a fox or a Lion respectively. It is also the reason why a Hare have not been equipped with the ability to appreciate Operas, which would be superfluous to its life. Given that a match between abilities and tasks has been found to cut across all creatures, it is reasonable to assume that we are also matched to the tasks before us (Hume & Sayre-McCord 2006). Looked in the context of our ‘design flaws’ as far as having the ability to anticipate an afterlife is concerned, one can only conclude that there is no afterlife. Look at the way we are normally less concerned with doing good for a reward in our afterlife. Look a ...
Cite this document
(“Is there an afterlife and what would be required for an afterlife Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/54148-is-there-an-afterlife-and-what-would-be-required
(Is There an Afterlife and What Would Be Required for an Afterlife Essay)
“Is There an Afterlife and What Would Be Required for an Afterlife Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/54148-is-there-an-afterlife-and-what-would-be-required.
Almost all schools of faith prescribe an eternal life after this. Of course, such belief can not be materialized without promises with a soul to embrace teachings, based upon cause and effect theory of a religion. The representations of human beliefs through art are as old as its very existence.
When a Muslim passes away, he/she is washed and packed in a clean and white clothe called ‘Kafan’. This process is done as the first step for the life after death. Islam teaches that there will be a day of judgment after death. When a person dies, he/she will remain in his/her grave till the Day of Judgment.
If they do not follow these guidelines, they do not enter into heaven. This explains that their lives are spoilt, and they are dropped into heal where there is constant suffering. Buddhism religion, on the other hand, maintains that death is not the end of life.
The Mesopotamians believed in the grim and dour hypothesis that sickness and death were a direct consequence of sins committed. They gave no leeway to this notion as any hope of salvation by a divine existence after death was lost on this cohort. It was believed that the dead may come back and consume the living so innumerous offerings were made to the dead so that this consequence may never come to pass.
Around 2000 B.C.E., ancient Mesopotamians faced hardships in their daily lives, and the afterlife they envisioned mirrored these hardships. In The Epic of Gilgamesh: Enkidu’s Dream, Enkidu describes a frightening view of life after death to Gilgamesh.
He says that after life is usually used to make people appreciate death, and see how it is priceless. After life is used to show us that, after the end of our physical life, we proceed to another world where we start new life afresh. Nobody knows how the place looks like and the validity of the statement.
Hell according to the Christian belief is the prime punishment and signifies absence of God and presence of Saturn.
Therefore, the ultimate goal of Christians is eternal life in the presence of the Lord (God). In the Bible, which is the guiding
Hence, the paper will make a comparative analysis of the concept of afterlife believed by the Christian community on the one side, and the one discussed by the author on the other.
Vonnegut (7), with the help of some fictional
ns and Christians, most Christians hold the belief that after dying, believers go to heaven which is a place where they would have the presence of God and other believers. It is a place where the believers are freed from sin as well as from all of its manifestations including
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is there an afterlife and what would be required for an afterlife for FREE!