In children, the zone of proximal development is the potential of actual development. This means if a child is taught through imitation or through collaboration, the capability of development is the zone of…
Vygotsky suggests that Piaget is using adult thinking to solve a child’s actual thought process. Both views have merit to a degree, but Vygotsky’s view can help expand a child’s education from what is to what can be.
The zone of proximal development is the ability of the child to mimic or learn through group intervention. The zone of proximal development is the abilities the child can be taught. Vygotsky feels that the child should be judged on the level of zone proximal development. Vygotsky gave an example about two children being on the same level in actual development, but having a different zone of proximal development. Vygotsky asserts that children having a different zone of proximal development will not experience the same level of actual development.
Piaget does not agree with the zone of proximal development, but rather asserts that the test of actual development is the level a child should be judged by. Piaget feels current tests of actual development are the true measure of the child’s ability. Vygotsky’s method contends that the zone of proximal development is not just potential. For example, a child might mimic a simple behavior that they can grasp like a simple math problem. However, if an advanced mathematics was introduced, no matter how many times demonstrated, the child would not pick up the skill. The zone of proximal development is what a child can achieve with help, not impossible tasks beyond their level of development.
The zone of proximal development leads to actual development according to Vygotsky. His point of view is tests like Piaget uses only test the actual development, not the actual ability to develop or the rate of development. Learning and development are never on an equal basis. The development is either before or after learning. The two are not parallel in relation to each other.
Vygotsky also pointed out that animals do not have a zone of proximal ...
Cite this document
(“Response for Vygotsky Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/545146-response-for-vygotsky
(Response for Vygotsky Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Response for Vygotsky Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/545146-response-for-vygotsky.
This paper compares and contrasts Vygotsky, Piaget and Bruner with respect to their study of knowledge acquisition. According to Piaget “whatever goes on in the head is organised in a way that parallels the organization of external behaviour. It is the set of relationships or the logic of the system, that get internalised, not just the behaviour”(Nuthall, 1997, p.21).
After a brief introduction to the basic premises of Cognitive Development Theory, this paper will compare and contrast the approaches of Piaget and Vygotsky to intelligence and its developmental stages. Classroom applications will be considered. Not all cognitive development theories are alike, but they do share some basic premises.
The Crisis In Higher Education. This is the title of the essay and the response is given in form of words. This is because it is written response giving a clear impression that it is not a response in form of action. In this response essay, I will give an answer to the writing strategy of the author, giving my own opinion of how his strategy is and the impact it has to the readers.
Their fame also emanates from immense contribution in the unveiling of scientific approach used in evaluating cognitive progress of a child. In Piaget’s premise of language development, he utilized structuralism together with cognitive growth to expound his argument concerning child’s development (Breseler, Cooper & Pamer, 2013).
As Piaget puts it, a child’s development is established through several stages, where a single stage symbolizes a qualitatively unique type of thinking. A child in the first stage has a dissimilar level of thinking with a
At times, the animals will wander outside the park center permitting the hunters to kill them. The farmers admire the hunters in light of the fact that the hunters shoot the buffalo before it can harm the farmers cattle
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Response for Vygotsky for FREE!