StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Discuss the Moral Considerations Relevant to the Killing of Human Being - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Discuss the Moral Considerations Relevant to the Killing of Human Being

According to those who oppose this practice, they argue that the foetus is a human being or a person from the time of conception. Hence terminating it is the same as killing a human being which in itself is not moral. The foetus acquires human characteristics remarkably early in its life such that by the tenth week, it already has acquired a face, arms, and also fingers and toes. Also, the internal organs and the brain activity can be detected by this time. As every human has the right to life, also does the foetus. Every woman has the right to decide what should be happening in her body, but the foetus's right to life always outweighs her right to make a choice as to what happens in her body (Thompson 45). Many people who support abortion have various premises to support their arguments. One is pregnancy due to rape. They argue that this is reason enough to terminate the pregnancy. However, one cannot say that those who were conceived through rape have less right to live than others. Pregnancy due to rape results in the conception of a baby that also has the equal right to life just like all the other conventional methods of conception (Thompson 56). Hence Judith wonders what will happen when the mother's life is threatened by the pregnancy, whether it is morally relevant to abort the pregnancy or not. ...
This means that abortion is morally permissible in some situations while in others it is not (Thompson 58). Judith's considerations on the morality of human killing are similar to the argument of Dan Brock who argued about the morality of voluntary, active euthanasia. Provision of relieve from suffering is among the many ways doctors take care of the patient`s wellbeing (Brock 30). Yet from a third-person point of view, it is not known whether an individual`s quality of life is extremely low that it is burdensome for the individual. Hence an individual might regard the continuation of his life to be unbearable because of the severity of his suffering; and want a doctor to end his suffering immediately by ending his life. This means that an individual acting on his values is morally permissible if his doing so is consistent with permitting others to the same freedom. This is mostly self-determination and the value of equal liberty. Hence an individual`s choice of voluntary, active euthanasia is more consistent with permitting others the same freedom. Therefore, an individual choice of voluntary, active euthanasia and the doctor's fulfilment of this request are morally permissible. However, voluntary, active euthanasia involves the deliberate killing of individuals, which is wrong. Hence voluntary, active euthanasia is also wrong. Removing life-sustaining treatment also amounts to deliberate killing of innocent people yet it is thought as morally permissible (Brock 32). This is only done when it is consistent with the well-being of the patient and his self determination. Hence voluntary, active euthanasia is morally permissible when it is consistent with the autonomy and the well-being of the patient (Brock 35). According ...Show more

Summary

Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Discuss the moral considerations relevant to the killing of human being. There are many questions people ask including the question why it is morally wrong to kill people. Human beings are killed through various ways including murders, assassinations, killed in wars and conflicts and many other ways…
Author : uharris
Discuss the Moral Considerations Relevant to the Killing of Human Being essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Discuss the Moral Considerations Relevant to the Killing of Human Being"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Being human person
Aristotle’s De Anima explores the idea of a soul and the actuality and potentiality of a soul itself. The knowing and the attending are parts of the soul’s actuality. In De Anima, by Aristotle, we see that there is a distinction between the “knowing” and the “attending.” This is considered Aristotle’s two levels of actuality.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Ethical and Moral considerations of Dr. Kevorkian
These laws are drafted on the principles of humanity, in line with generally accepted morals and ethics, defined in accordance to the society they are intended to be implemented in. The problem however arises when the definition of these ethics comes into debate.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Ethical and Moral Considerations in Personal Genetic Information
Among the societal concerns raised include fairness of use, privacy and maintenance of confidential information, stigmatization, reproductive issues, clinical safety and feasibility, individual and environmental health concerns, commodification and the uncertainties accompanying genome technology.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible
I do not see a problem of having some cows herded and raised to be butchered and turned into someone's lunch or my steak dinner. On the other hand, I would think it is highly considered to be grotesque as much as unnecessary to brutally beat or torture a hapless kitten.
9 pages (2250 words) Essay
United Nations and International Human Rights
The United Nations has various governing bodies and arms which cover a variety of political concerns in the international scene. One of these concerns is international human rights. Securing international human rights is an essential responsibility of the United Nations, one which requires their legislative authority as well as their executive and adjudicatory powers.
15 pages (3750 words) Essay
Numerous theories of Human Rights have developed; the most prominent being Universalism and Cultural Relativism. Critically analyse a theory of Human Rights and discuss its relevance in the contemporary Human Rights field. Refer academic commentary
States have obligated upon themselves these rules and they serve to limit the autonomy of states to do something toward their whole population: married persons and the unmarried, men as well as women, citizen as well as non-citizen,
20 pages (5000 words) Essay
Complexity of human being and their moral actions
However, the truth is, the type of evidence required to make an ethical and a moral decision differs from that needed to make an immoral and unethical decision. In what nature or form are these differences? This
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Present and discuss the moral positions of Natural Law and Existentialism. Next evaluate the theories and discuss any relevant criticisms
The same also proposes that natural law is absolute in authority and is therefore binding on all human beings. The theory continues that natural law is naturally knowable by all humans, with the good anteceding the right and comprising people’s
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Honor killing
A huge number of Arab males identify females as a valuable personal object that requires protection and security from others as she represents family honor. However, she is also considered less relevant when it comes to
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Defend or criticize the claim, There is no significant moral difference between killing and letting die
Those who are against active euthanasia argue that killing is morally worse than letting someone die intentionally. It is regarded that a doctor who kills his patient directly to relief him from
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation