Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Ontological argument - Rene Descartes - Research Paper Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : lizziepollich

Summary

The paper will also seek support from the philosophical contributions made by the later philosopher particularly Nietzsche and Voltaire, due to the very fact that the doctrines of both these philosophers resemble in theme and scope with Rene Descartes. …

Extract of sample
Ontological argument - Rene Descartes

The researcher is determined to critically analyze Descartes’ Ontological Argument in the light of the doctrines articulated by Avicenna, St. Anselm and Nietzsche by the authors including Roger Ariew, John Hawthorne, John M. DePoe and Oppenheimer & Zalta. Since it is a basic research in nature and scope, the researcher will seek support from the material discussing the philosophy of the Medieval and Classical Eras, where the paper will examine the existence of Ontological Argument in ancient times and influence of the Descartes’ doctrine on the future philosophers. One of the most astonishing points raised by Descartes, which invited anger and displeasure of his contemporary religious circles, is his determination to reject believing in such God, existence of Whom could not be proved through intellect, evidence and observation. The notion not only brought opposition of the religious dogmatism of his time, but also the philosophy kept on enjoying the status of a highly controversial treatise for the future centuries to come. Consequently, Descartes was aptly declared as rebel, pervert and rejecter of true Christian faith. However, he stuck to the validity of his argument, and laid stress upon the significance of empiricism for having faith in various spiritual, natural, physical and social phenomena. The present study will look into the influence of Descartes’ notion on the future scientific developments too, which vehemently emphasize upon the presence of sound proofs in order to examine the validity of a hypothesis. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.
His argument, however, was wholly rejected by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s suggestion was that there is no way that mere mortals can conceive what God’s nature is, and thus we surely cannot conceive God like Anselm has said we can (Oppy 122-3). Therefore, this argument can be used only by the ones who can understand the true essence of God and that cannot be anyone but God Himself. David Hume was another philosopher who went against Anselm’s argument. His criticism was that it has no evidential reasoning. His argument was that the existence of a being cannot be proved simply through a…
9 pages (2259 words)
The Ontological Thesis: Anselm, Kant, Descartes and a Touch of the Buddha
From this research it is clear that ontology includes the fundamental questions of being, the basic properties of what and how and how much and why of anything classifiable. This ontological argument speaks of God as the most non-reducible example of primary being. The idea is that when being is reduced to its ground source, there is God, and that beyond that point of fully reduced concept of ultimate being can be nothing because to imagine beyond that point means we were never yet at that point, in reduction, in the first place, and to argue otherwise is without rational defense. Kant…
13 pages (3263 words)
Ontological Argument criticism by Kant "Critique of Pure Reason"
Kant vehemently reaffirmed the intelligibility of the world as demonstrated by common sense and science. He has had immense influence in the world of philosophy and continues to be a great source of inspiration for all. Despite rejecting some of his core ideas, the subsequent generation that lived under German idealism has widely adopted his work. His prime objection was that existence is not a predicate. The foundation of the ontological argument was the existence of a God that is greater than a God who does not exist. Thus, the very foundation was baffling and questionable. Kant advocated…
5 pages (1255 words)
Kant's Argument for the existence of God
Therefore, the arguments about God’s existence come in distinct forms in that some are drawn on reason and moral philosophy. There are many questions concerning how people believe that there exist a supreme spiritual being. In real sense, the supreme spiritual being exists. Throughout human history, they have always thought of the existence of God. There is sufficient evidence to belief and proof that God exist. For a long time, human beings have tried to offer support for that belief. In place of ontological, cosmological, and metaphysical assertions, Kant came up with a new theory to argue…
4 pages (1004 words)
The existence of god
In this way, the analysis will seek to provide a thoughtful overview of some of the most salient critiques of Anselm’s ontological view as well as to provide the reader with the alternate views that philosophers have developed over the years in response to it. Stone asserts that Anselm’s argument purports that God is conceived as the being that supersedes other beings. He purports that God exists in both understanding and reality. This is because if His existence was perceived not to be in reality, another being greater than God could be conceived. Therefore, his argument articulates that…
5 pages (1255 words)
Can the Existence of God be Proven Ontologically?
One of such theories is the ontological argument; in this paper I will argue that this theory is not enough to prove the existence of God. The ontological argument is priori; it seeks to explain the existence of a greater being using logic as to what the appreciative of the superior being that is God is. The theory was popularized by Anselm who used psalms 14 as his reference point and addressed the fool who says in his heart that God does not exist. He states that the fool hears and understands that there is a greater being although he does not understand its existence. Anselm purports that…
3 pages (753 words)
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument
That is, absolute cause of everything, which implies that God exists. Anselm at the beginning starts by explaining and rooting his ontology in the Christian understanding of God, in that He is “something beyond which nothing greater can be thought” (Pojman & Rea 139). In this regard, Anselm implies that Gods is the end in power, love, truth and other qualities beyond which nothing of better quality can be conceived. Anselm takes the reader through two steps: he explains and defines the basic qualities of God in relation to his divineness and explains the absolute necessity of God‘s…
4 pages (1004 words)