Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

The views of Descartes on Rationalism - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Author : charlottetoy
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

Name Institution Course Date The Views of Descartes on Rationalism Meditation is the basis of modern philosophy. The urge to identify, evaluate and prove a notion or a fact led Rene Descartes to develop his philosophical analysis of common perception that people had during his time…

Extract of sample
The views of Descartes on Rationalism

Descartes’ meditations are pegged on his rational mind, which led him to discover the truth independently of the experience via innate ideas. He argues that there are many things that he accepted as truth in his childhood. Descartes refuted his childish and youthful beliefs and sought to build his ideas afresh. He used a methodological approach to handle issues that nagged his mind. He is quoted as saying that “some thoughts within him were as due to his power of thinking.” In applying these thoughts in ideas of notion, he was able to distinguish them from others. In his first meditation, Descartes doubts many things that happen to human life. Notably, Descartes employs a rational and methodological doubt. For instance, he states that when he dreams, he is deceived by illusions that he sees in the dreams. Similarly, the insane perceive the same dreams in their waking moments. He argues that human beings are thinking beings in a position to know their minds distinctively and clearly, but have to work towards knowing their own mind. Descartes is aware of the power to reason, which he views as the basis of accepting knowledge. Descartes regards anything that is doubtful as false. He gives a critical analysis of his existence and the existence of demons. He argues that he exists because he has conceived that opinion in his mind. He clearly notes the difference that exists between “I think” and “I exist”. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Rationalism and Pragmatism of James and Descartes
According to him, he carried out thoughts on his own doubt and was sceptical about the existence of people in order to see whether or not the doubt that he had in his mind would survive. However, as he carried out his arguments and personal belief in his existence he found that it was impossible to doubt whether or not a person was living. A God that deceived an individual and made him think twice about his existence was termed as an ‘Evil Demon’ by Descartes and he says that even if this argument were not true, one would still have to exist in order to be deceived. “But I have convinced…
4 pages (1004 words)
Rationalism (Rene Descartes) and Empiricism (David Hume).
According to the research findings there are two contrastive schools of thought; while one gives premium to reason, the other gives premium to experience. The first school of thought that gives premium to reason is the rationalist school of thought. The second school of thought is the empiricist school. While the major proponent for rationalism is Rene Descartes, the major proponent of empiricism is David Hume. Lacey states that rationalism is “any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.” Instead of appealing to emotions and their sensory organs, rationalists…
7 pages (1757 words)
Descartes
What are the sources of epistemology? What are the limits and structure of epistemology? If it is considered as a study of justified belief (JB), epistemology deals to reply to such questions as: How are we able to comprehend the idea of justification? What are the factors which make these justified beliefs justify? Is this justification external or internal to one’s own mind? Broadly comprehend epistemology deals with issues of dissemination and creation of knowledge in specific areas of question. This paper talks about what epistemology is, how it relates to justified belief, what is…
5 pages (1255 words)
Descarte's and Hume's answer to Russell's question
His obsession in geometry, made him believe in certainty because geometry always gave a certain answer and not imaginations (Hattab 2007, p.51) He invented certainty basing on his logical doubtful whereby he doubted the existence of everything around him. He never imagined that something existed instead he had to be sure of the existence of that element by questioning. As the inventor of certainty, Descartes questioned the origin of his background and if really, God existed. Hume, on the other hand, is in total opposition of what Descartes thinks. He objects Descartes ideas and views…
4 pages (1004 words)
descartes
There must be a proper procedure of metaphysical verification through which the mind can get certain of what it thinks and there must be strong emphasizing proofs for his. But later on refuting has own arguments to some extent, Rene argues that since he is certain about the fact that he is thinking about something, so he can conclude on this tautology that man is something which has the ability to think. Existence of God is one of the most important and centric circle of attention for the mediator. He builds the proofs for the existence of God by building an argument based in the human mind…
7 pages (1757 words)
Descartes
Although he decided to doubt everything, at some point the Cartesian method hit a brick wall. This happens when he himself agrees to settle for an assumption in as far as the existence of God is concerned. He makes an inference by saying that God is infinite and that he cannot conceive a cause by which God is produced, this means that his perception of God is doubtable since he is unable to explain the origin of God (page 117). This explanation does not in any way prove the existence of God. It is probably the weakest argument in his work and which also shows either fear or reluctance on his…
7 pages (1757 words)
Locke and Descartes source of knowledge
For this reason, the theory holds that metaphysics, ethics, and math principles are fundamentally true and that physical evidence and proof are not needed to ascertain knowledge. Due to this belief, the rationalism theory is in direct opposition to empiricism. Empiricism, of which Locke is an integral proponent, contends that knowledge can only be obtained via the experience of sense. It emphasizes that evidence and experience, particularly the experience of sense, plays a more fundamental role in idea formation than traditions and innate ideas (Scheibe & Falkenburg 2011). The theory also…
4 pages (1004 words)