1963). Clearly, his prepositions are the basis of life. They help human beings to make decisions even the scientists who only believe in facts that can be proved. One of the prepositions is the ego as an aspect of identity. It indicates the originality of the human nature. Fichte argues that the ego is what comes first in decision-making. It controls the choices made by human beings in their daily life. This preposition is significant in that it brings out the aspect of individuality. Human beings need to be themselves. They need to make decisions in all categories of life rather than waiting for people to do it for them. Fichte says that this preposition dominates the whole being of a man. However, the decisions made by the person usually have effects in the future. Fichte asserts that there must be conscious when making choices (Copleston, F. 1963). This means ego is not the only factor that drives human being. In other words, there are some dangers related to the use of ego in decision-making. Experience is needed in making a choice rather than emotions. If one has absolute ego, it is argued that he might make decisions that he will regret in the future. There must be a balance between the ego and the conscious part of the human mind. It clearly comes out from the above rational discussion that, there is the interconnectedness between the ego and other things. The things that we are talking about are the second and third prepositions as proposed by Fichte (Copleston, F. 1963). If there is a need to control the ego, then what should control it? According to Fichte, non-ego is the controlling factor of ego. This is the second preposition. It walks in the opposite direction of the ego. One has certainly to be able to strike the balance in life. This applies to all categories of life. The essence of this is that the ego and the non-ego must cancel each other for the balance to be made. It thus, an integral feature of the human mind in controlling emotions. Some people have too much ego such that seeing the obvious sense is a problem. They always want to impose themselves. They want their identity to reign. In this light, they tend to make wrong decisions that put them into problems. They act so weirdly in situations they are supposed to act otherwise. Such people are not rationale and therefore cannot be the best leaders. They are controlled by their emotions and are always dictatorial. This is advantageous to know so that people do not make mistakes in voting in leaders who will be part of the problems rather than solutions. Once the ego and the non-ego cancel, the only possible thing that should exist is the conscious. This is because; its absence will be rendered useless. What he decides thereafter may as well not be of importance to his life. There must be another thing to bring about the rationality. The ‘I’, which is the third preposition, plays a crucial role between the ego and the non-ego. It ensures the viability of the conscious when the first two prepositions cancel. As Fichte says, it is particularly significant to the decision made. Ego is profitable, but the absolute ego could pose some problems. The non-ego, on the other hand, is also valuable. However, if it dominates it renders the whole process useless. That is why a mediator must be employed. This brings out the validity of the
Philosophical prepositions by Fichte Author’s Name Date due It is common knowledge that philosophy deals with wisdom. It deals with the choice between rational and irrational things or statements. It requires long-sighted individuals to get to the philosophical rhythm…
Comparing and contrasting Beauvoir's "The Second Sex" and Sommers' "Who Stole Feminism" on their philosophical reasoning on the subject at hand has the ability to enlighten the philosophical mind joining them on their journeys.
Both Beauvoir and Sommers address the issue of feminism from a systematic or topical method in which they tackle philosophy one question at a time.
Rather, this paper, for more clarity, will explore the parallels and the intersections of the notable works of these four and how they correlate to each other.
As history would show, Plato and Aristotle are two of the three founders of Ancient-Western Philosophy together with Socrates.
One thing is clear. He left multiple legacies that will be felt by mankind throughout its foreseeable future. Among them, Leibniz was a forerunner of wave particle theory. And in 1676 (Haselhurst and Howie, 1998-2007. "Philosophy - On Love of Wisdom from Truth & Reality") he discovered and developed Differential Calculus independently of Sir Isaac Newton whose work in calculus slightly preceded Leibniz.
On the other hand, ethical subjectivism holds that morality is relative to the individual and that the idea of right or wrong is not universally binding. It is worth to note that both concepts are culture specific which shapes the behavior and moral
People tend to hold on the values of their culture, whatever the culture perceive best, culture like many source of behavior may come from many different sources. A family being the smallest code of origin defines how a person behaves in different
However, most of these individuals move into the US in search of a better life that is commonly known as the ‘American Dream’. The bone of contention is that when the illegal immigrants move into the US they take up
It is surprising that although he wants to find the same, at the back of his mind he believes the same universe provides him with nothing. He finds the earth to be mute and meaningless phenomena (Taylor 20).
Vertonghen and Theeboom (2010) argue on the importance of the art of the youth. They present important lessons in relation to the practice of martial arts. The article also explores the attitude of Vertonghen and Theeboom (2010) towards martial arts in a tone that
On the contrary, Christianity is a monotheistic religion that believes in the supreme creator of the universe, who is also the father of Jesus Christ. Buddhism seems to be an offshoot religion of Hinduism while Christianity draws its