StudentShare solutions
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Essay example - Epicurus' View On Death

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 5 (1255 words)
This essay demonstrates and analyzes Epicurus’ view on death, that is one of the most controversial objects of philosophic analysis. This essay portrays death as the real mystery and nobody could tell for sure what could we meet in another world and if it exists for sure…

Extract of sample

This essay describes Epicurus and his views on death. He used to be one of the most popular philosophers whose contribution to the meaning of death was persistently disregarded. Death is the topic that surrounded by considerable philosophic controversies even in modern society. According to Epicurus and his philosophical views, death is neither pleasant nor painful. Therefore, based on this premise, death cannot be bad. The researcher suggests that Epicurus may be right in that death is not worth being feared of, as long as no one can escape it. It is more reasonable and rational for people to take death as something inevitable. Simultaneously, the difficulty interpreting the meaning of badness should not be dismissed and, despite its value, Epicurus’ view cannot guarantee that death is bad or horrid for everyone or that death is bad and horrid at all. The researcher also uses comparisons between Western and Eastern worlds to give better explanation on the topic. In the Western world, death is usually considered as an extremely bad and undesirable phenomenon. The relationship between death and badness is analyzed in the essay, it tends to be considered from three different standpoints. In conlusion, the researcher sums up Epicurean philosophy of death. It falls short from the arguments that could support or deny the criteria of badness proposed by Epicurus. Objectively, no one can know whether death is pleasurable or painless, and this is one of the major pitfalls of Epicurean death philosophy. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Soul and Justice in the works of Plato, Aristotle and Epicurus
Plato (428-347 BC) defined the soul’s parts as appetite, spirit, and reason (Plato, trans. 1974). A just society would also have this structure: the productive (worker) class (appetite part of the soul); the protective (warrior) class (spirit part of the soul); and the governing (ruling) class (reason part of the soul). Individual justice would consist of the appetite part of the soul obeying…
3 pages (753 words)
Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism?
Thomas Hobbes believed that the best way to live life is through an absolute sovereignty in the form of a government (“Thomas Hobbes”). Having different beliefs on methods of how life must be lived, both of them thought that these methods serve the self-interest of individuals. Their philosophies therefore summarize that of a moral egoist which states that it is ethical to do actions that…
3 pages (753 words)
Epicurus's Argument
Amidst all these huge achievements, life before birth and after death remains still as a mystery. Majority of the people approaches their end of life situations with lot of concerns and discomfort because of the uncertainty about the life after death. At the same time many others accept death with pleasure and dignity. Epicurus was ancient Greek philosopher who argued that the worries about death…
4 pages (1004 words)
The Philosophy of Epicurus
By reasoning inductively, he says that since both the young and the old can seek wisdom and since everyone is either young or old, everyone is capable of seeking wisdom. Also in another way, we can infer that Epicurus believes everyone to be capable of seeking wisdom. Indeed he advises people, either young or old, to study philosophy, because he believes that they are capable to seeking wisdom by…
3 pages (753 words)
Epicurus and epictetus
Essentially, these great scholars of philosophy had different consolation on the reasons for valuing and giving meaning to life (Pojman 530). Therefore, this essay will delve on two Greek philosophers, Epictetus and Epicurus, to try to understand their ideologies regarding the importance of living life without having to worry about the occurrence of death. 2. Epicurus According to ancient…
6 pages (1506 words)
final essay
He further goes on to state that, there is no life after death, and the gods cannot punish human beings after they are dead. This is because the universe is eternal, infinite, and is composed of atoms which move freely around the empty place. This paper analyzes the teachings of Epicurus, by looking at his concept of ataraxia (Keefe, 2010). This paper identifies how Epicurus defines pleasure, and…
5 pages (1255 words)
Epicurus Paper
As a result, these good and bad aspects in life are what contribute to pleasure and pain respectively. Epicurus went ahead to describe what exactly pain and please were in his understanding. He mentioned that a person may decide to choose between pain and pleasure. As a result, if an individual selects pleasure over pain in their lives, then they are prone to endure only the pleasurable things in…
7 pages (1757 words)