Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Why does J. A. Fodor think that there must be a language of thought? Is he right? - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Author : cauer
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 8 (2008 words)

Summary

Jerry Fodor is a prominent linguistic philosopher and cognitive scientist. Fodor’s linguistic philosophy eschews structural models of language for an approach that builds on Noam Chomsky’s generative grammar…

Extract of sample
Why does J. A. Fodor think that there must be a language of thought? Is he right?

Specifically, Fodor advanced a notion of a language of thought. Fodor’s Language of Thought Hypothesis (LOTH) states that the thought process occurring in the mind is a symbolic system that parallels a language in structure. Jerry Fodor’s presented LOTH in his aptly titled book The Language of Thought (Fodor 1975). Through an examination the major platforms of the LOTH hypothesis, as well as prominent criticisms, this essay examines the extent that Fodor is successful in articulating the existence of a language of thought. Language of Thought Philosophers have formulated LOTH by considering the multiplicity of thoughts, or propositional attitudes. One can identify propositional attitudes in sentences like ‘A wishes that B’, or ‘A thinks that B’, or ‘A intends that B’. A is the subject of attitude, B is the sentence, and ‘that B’ is the proposition or the object of the attitude. If we say that C stands for verbs like ‘wishes’, ‘thinks’, and ‘intends’, then the propositional attitude sentences would take the form: ‘A Cs that B’. Therefore, LOTH can be considered as a hypothesis that features how we create propositional attitudes in our ‘mental language’, and how we relate our thought and thinking with them. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Assisted Suicide: A Right or Wrong?
In other cases, euthanasia is given to old patients who have gone into comma and have remained in that state for years. People may want to die because of several reasons. They may be continuously feeling very low in depression, and may seek refuge in suicide, though there is also a significant percentage of people that resolve to finish their lives because of occasional distress and emotional outburst, that may occur as a result of divorce, loss of a loved one or forced sex. Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics that have invited a lot of debate. Euthanasia is approached with two…
Choose a point in singer(rethinking life and death) that you strongly disagree with. Explain this point and why u think he is wr
Singer as a philosopher had a distinctive perception on life and death. He believed that every person has the right to decide whether to live or not. However, I strongly disagree with his idea of infanticide where an innocent soul will be killed against the will of God. Killing a person in any stage of his life is a crime. There can be no sufficient reasons for killing a person whether he is disabled, unborn or handicapped. Singer being a philosopher failed to understand the divine essence of human of human soul. So it could be easier for him to argue towards infanticide because he consider…
3 pages (753 words)
Ideology of Advertising
We live in the age of conspicuous consumption. We are proud of having an opportunity to buy more and more goods and products. We do not realize why do we really need all this stuff, but we DO realize that we really want it! A greedy worm lives inside of our minds and hearts and it eats out our moral principles, while filling the gaps in our minds and hearts with the ideas of greediness. It is better to talk about these related phenomena, i.e. advertising and ideology and explain the way they are related and what this relation means to us. …
3 pages (753 words)
s there a genuine "right" to have children, and if so how far does it extend? Explore either the question of an individual r
This paper is a critical evaluation of the human’s natural right to have children as a comparative debate on different socio-economic and political scenarios of different countries. Genuineness of Right to Have Children This question is, perhaps, the most personal one for most people. Having a child is the most basic reason behind legitimate relationships between male and female by form of marriage in all the demographic groups. It is a subject under the religious and cultural jurisdiction of the mankind. Many societies, even if it is a part of an overpopulated country, have a greater…
6 pages (1506 words)
Why does Mackie think we need an "error theory"? Do you think he is right to believe that we need it?
The error theory suggests that morals are not absolute, that what is morally right or wrong vary from one society to another. It is a theory that states that morals are judged, not by the universal moral norms, but according to the society within which a circumstance calls for moral clarification (Dorsey 2006, p.495). When one considers the definition above, it can be stated that the morals are no longer absolute in different societies because of the fact that they have evolved over a long period, changing considerably from one society to another. A good number of the proponents of this…
12 pages (3012 words)
Why does Buss think men and women sometimes pursue casual sex?
Secondary problematic issue is of course with regards to the fact that different societies around the globe interpret the interactions and behaviors, as well as psychology, of male and female members in different ways. As such, the interplay between evolutionary expectation and the way in which society demarcates these interactions must be wholly separated with regards to the way in which male and female exhibit differentials in behavior. Accordingly, the following analysis will be concentric upon delineating the differential that exists between a male and female sexual behavior and…
5 pages (1255 words)
Is Socrates a feminist? How might one argue that he is? How would they argue that he is not? Which position is right?
Significantly, to an extent Plato promoted the notion of both men and women being equal with some of his views supporting this claim specifically in book 5, where he tackled on Socrates’ view that women have plenty potential as philosopher-rulers or guardians of the state (VanHeest 1). On the support for women equality platform, the foundation of this claim is his assertion that a human should be judged on his or her soul and not on external appearance altogether. However, there are more of his views that entrench his stand on feminism i.e. that woman’s biology should not settle the…
5 pages (1255 words)