Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Elucidation and Verification of the "Brain In a Vat" Philosophy: Are We Or Are We Not? - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Author : keaton59
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 5 (1255 words)

Summary

Over a long period of philosophy and argument’s evaluation, the illustration of the global or Cartesian theory has been referred to by the ‘Brain in a Vat’ theory and/or experimented to be a brain being put in a vat and attached to wires by a program…

Extract of sample
Elucidation and Verification of the "Brain In a Vat" Philosophy: Are We Or Are We Not?

For the possibility of individuals to think that they are merely a brain in a vat the argument has a positive and a negative side. Why so? The validity of the argument may or may not be provided but for students of philosophy this thought is always pondered upon; whether them believing if they are a brain in a vat could stimulate the external experiences human beings go through while having it inside their skulls. What has been put forth as sarcastically doubtful is the possibility of the above explanation, which refers to the idea that the possibility of human beliefs being false cannot be removed if the surety of to provide human beings with a good reason to believe they are not a brain in a vat. Thus, for the explanation provided by many philosophers over a long period of time, the gained sequences add to the information in such a manner that if human beings know that something (let it be x), then they are not brains in a vat. On the other side of the argument the statement expounds that if human beings are not sure of being brains in vat than they have no what so ever idea about x. Thus, amongst many of the reasons that will be provided further, one belief to prove that people are not just brains in a vat is the human consciousness of realizing and strengthening their confidence with certainty. As modern philosophers are continuously disapproving a conflict and spar is seen in the assessment and differentiation between skepticism and realism. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Epistemology: What is Knowledge, How We Gain Knowledge?
Moreover, “Y” is true, because we cannot know something that is false for what is false does not exist and we cannot know something that does not exist because knowing something that does not exist only means knowing nothing at all. So, knowing “Y”, “X” can have a justification or a clear rationale for thinking that “Y” is true and exists. This justification can be given through intuition, immediate certainty of “X” that what he believes, “Y” is true; reasoning, the act of “X” on proving that “Y” is true based on concepts on argumentation; or sense experience,…
3 pages (753 words)
Are we our bodies or are we our minds? Descartes and Nietzsche's arguments
I will discuss and compare arguments from both philosophers’ viewpoints in order to reach a conclusion. In “Meditations on First Philosophy,” Rene Descartes begins to uncover the underlying truth for humankind through various methods. His ideas and thoughts were considered radical at that time, particularly because his arguments went against those made by Aristotle, upon which society perceived truth (SparkNotes Editors). Because of this fact, Descartes tried to entice Aristotelian philosophers into reading all six meditations by starting off light. The first meditation is supposed to…
4 pages (1004 words)
Can We Prove the Existence of God?
Someone properly planned our bodies and then did his best in order to realize this plan. This someone is God. I am Christian and believe in Jesus Christ as my Savior. However, it is not the only reason why I am sure that everything on the Planet is created by God. I am not the only person who has this point of view. There are also numerous arguments that will prove the existence of God. For instance, cosmos is a magnificent result of someone’s thorough work. It is not just a theory; this point of view was proved by one of the medieval philosophers – Saint Thomas Aquinas. This philosopher…
3 pages (753 words)
Are we free or determined?
On the contrary, when people talk about freedom to do something, it is constructive freedom (Fromm 12). It is, therefore, reasonable to argue that freedom can as well be determined by the objective of the people at a particular time. On the other hand, to be determined is the opposite of being free. Being determined primarily means that the people cannot act out of free will since they are controlled by some socio-political systems. This paper seeks to address the question on freedom and human determination in light of the views of Descartes Rene, Erich Fromm, and James Rachels and Stuart…
5 pages (1255 words)
Whether or not we should use animals in medical research
Every side of the argument has posed questions concerning man’s place with respect to these animals and the natural world. Most people arguing against the use of animals for medical research have based their arguments on the relationship between humans and nature philosophies as put forward by Peter Singer that humans do not exist totally above nature, with the focus basically on animals. Singer refers to most attitudes that humans possess towards animals as speciesism that is a concept, which has existed throughout history (Owen 33). Before him, Aristotle was of the view that nature…
4 pages (1004 words)
Choices We Make
Chapter 4 of the book by Solomon, Higgins, and Martin (2011) begins with the quote from Alice in Wonderland where the Caterpillar questions the very importance of self (p. 285). In Carroll's (1996) text, neither the caterpillar nor actually Alice care too much about their identities. They choose the selves they want to be, as if they were Sartrians, but in much more playful manner. Yet in one of the responses to the caterpillar Alice remarks: “Oh, I'm not particular as to size, only one doesn't like changing so often, you know” (Carroll, 1996). That means that there are still limits to…
4 pages (1004 words)
Who We Are As People?
Who we are as people is a broad field of analysis of human life and all that is attributed towards it. The bible explains the origin of human life in the book of genesis. Charles Darwin is a scientist who wrote about the origin of man. In his manuscript, man evolved from a single cell. The replication of these cells led to the development of the first species of man. Religious societies have their own way of interpretation creation. However, the method is based on strong belief as it cannot be physically proved. The book of genesis contains the whole story of creation. The religious view of…
5 pages (1255 words)