Death Penalty Essay

Death Penalty Essay Essay example
Undergraduate
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
Death Penalty [Name of the Writer] [Name of the Institution] Death Penalty Introduction Death penalty even referred to as capital punishment or death sentence is used to execute a criminal/convict for his wrong doings (Johnson, 2012, p.2012). Over the years, lawmakers of different regions have exercised several different methods of execution; different methods include hanging, gas chambers, lethal injection, etc…

Introduction

Certain cultures and societies stand against it and others support it. In this paper we will be discussing that capital punishment is an ethical and moral way of punishing individuals who indulge in wrong doings. To support this view, the argument will be backed with the ethical theory of Utilitarianism and Kant’s Categorical Imperative. Discussion According to the Utilitarian perspective, actions should be considered as right or wrong on the basis of utility or benefits and costs those actions have to offer to the society (MacKinnon, 2009, p.38) . The view even suggests that those actions should be selected which have higher utility than cost for the society, as compared to any other actions that can be conducted. Death penalty, offers more benefits than costs to the society, therefore, it is considered as a morally and ethically correct action. The various benefits of death penalty include; death penalty is considered as a very harsh punishment, people fear death. This fear of death may stimulate other criminals from committing crimes in the future. Therefore, death sentence inflicts fear of death in criminals, and due to this fear, criminals might avoid committing future crimes. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

DEATH PENALTY
An article published by The New York Times referred to as “An Indefensible Punishment”, has presented the views on how death penalty needs to be abolished. For this particular study the focus has been placed in support of the opinion that death penalty cannot be considered to be a correct method of punishing an individual primarily because it is a very indefensible form of penalty to be…
Abolition of the Death Penalty
Means of capital punishment include but not limited to; hanging, crucifixion, electrocution, stoning etc. Van Den Haag gives five reasons justifying the constitutionality of the death penalty by concluding that the constitution allows for death penalty which is not the case (van den hag 128).The constitution states that “if life was to be taken away as form of punishment, then it must be in…
Death Penalty, Kantian Ethics, and Utilitarianism
The argument that almost everyone would prefer life imprisonment than execution is often put forward by these people. But I do not agree at all with this argument as it does not hold any weightage in my point of view. …
Is the Death Penalty Just and Applied Fairly?
The issue of capital punishment, more specifically the death penalty, is a topic that can split the American public as far as their view points to two extreme sides. There are those who are against the death penalty and those who are for the death penalty. The death penalty can be such a polarizing topic that there are 16 states that have abolished the death penalty as opposed to the 34 states as…
Case study paper on - death penalty both pro and anti capital punishment
On the other hand, the article written by Hugo Bedau argues that death penalty is a lawful killing, and since it is a form of killing the law should rise above it and condemn it. He says that death penalty is an immoral act in an indecent form of action by the law, and the fact is that it is a dignified form of killing executed and polished by the law. I feel that both the articles make a very…
Vanderbilt Law School debate on the Death penalty
Owing to the above details provided, the opponent of death penalty, Dr. Ken Haas, was more convincing in his argument (Haas and Marquis). Death penalty is not only about liberal or conservative politics but also about the moral choices of this nation. This dispels any notion that the death penalty debate is about conservative and liberal politics. The proponent of the death penalty elaborates that…
Capital Punishment
The arguments of Pojman, which supports capital punishment, were based on three premises from anecdotal evidence. First, the deterrent effect of an object is increased with the increased degree of fear it can cause to a person. Second, people fear death more than any humane punishment, and third, death penalty is a humane punishment. From these premises, the author concludes that the death penalty…