StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Contrasting the Hobbesian and Lockeian Social Contracts - Essay Example

Nobody downloaded yet

Extract of sample
Contrasting the Hobbesian and Lockeian Social Contracts

John Locke’s “The Second Treatise of Government” and Thomas Hobbes’ “Leviathan” both present theories for the construction of social contracts that would enable the sanctioning of a sovereign force to protect the whole. Where Locke takes a more liberal perspective, inviting the ideal that people can function by accepting a ruling authority for the greater good, Hobbes takes a similar yet opposing stance that while a ruling authority is key in the success of protecting the human race, people cannot accept such influence without giving up certain inalienable rights including their own personal sovereignty. With that said, a closer look will be taken into the contract theories of both Hobbes and Locke to determine how their different assumptions yield two distinct forms of social contracts and illuminate which political thinker’s ideal holds more value today. To begin with, John Locke has long been thought to be one of the most archetypal theorists in all of American political thinking. His ideas are so fundamental in the political landscape that it has been understood that his beliefs backed the foundations of the American Revolution in 1776. In his essay entitled “The Second Treatise of Government: An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government,” Locke details his theories for a distinct form of social contract in which he states that people would be bound by a moral code to uphold a certain dignity when dealing with others. By this code, people would do no harm to others or the property of others, but this could only be regulated by a governmental force that could provide protection from the inherent fear that not everyone would abide by the moral code set forth. Moreover, it is because of this need for protection from those of wavering morality that people would come together and form a state-sanctioned force which would umbrella a safety net upon their lives. It is important to note, however, that since this governmental faction is elected in a pseudo-democratic fashion for the need of the many that faction is only in place as long as the legitimacy of freedom remains intact. Moreover, the governmental faction is there for the protection of the whole, as an impartial judge, and will not persecute anybodyfor protecting his land or family. On the other hand, Hobbes’ “Leviathan: Or, the Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil” theorized that life was an anarchic mess, where people were unable to act for the good of the many and instead only focused on their own selfish needs. His moral code is similar to Locke’s only in the realm that people come together for a fundamental purpose – but that is where similarities end. Hobbes believed that people had to give up something to be part of the whole. It was regulatory without leadership, a constant realm of chaos and anarchy unless the social contract could be enforced which would essentially require everyone to act in the greater interests of the whole by giving up their own individualized sovereignty. Further, in Hobbes’ contract, people are inherently selfish beings. Unable to share the vested interests of others, people lived in an anarchic state that teetered between the needs of the one and the sacrifice of the many to achieve that fact. In this, Hobbes is almost the complete opposite of Locke in that people are unable to declare a sovereign ruling force without giving up their individualized sovereignty. People are unable to become part of the state without asserting that they no longer need any sort of individualism. Hobbes details that “therefore before the names of Just, and Unjust can have place, there must be some coercive Power, to compel men equally to the performance of their Covenants, by the terror of some punishment, greater than the benefit they expect” (Hobbes 97). Essentially, for the social contract to function in the ways Hobbes has detailed, people must be compelled by some ...Show more


John Locke’s “The Second Treatise of Government” and Thomas Hobbes’ “Leviathan” both present theories for the construction of social contracts that would enable the sanctioning of a sovereign force to protect the whole…
Author : royrunolfsdotti
Contrasting the Hobbesian and Lockeian Social Contracts
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Contrasting the Hobbesian and Lockeian Social Contracts"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Commercial Contracts
In the Law of Contract, the literal approach seem to be the default position for courts in terms of interpreting contracts2. However, important changes in the English legal system has caused courts to move from the mere literal approach to a more critical purposive approach3.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Federal Contracts
For this particular case, whereby an individual is interested in developing small control aircrafts to expand his/her business by competing for Department of Homeland Security contracts; there are numerous low-interest loan program that offer startup financing.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Legal contracts
When accepted by the other person it becomes a promise, which is transformed in to an agreement when valid considerations are set by both parties. An agreement becomes a contract when it is enforceable by the law; an agreement that is not enforceable is a void.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Contracts & Procurement
In order to sustain themselves, the family sold this property to a consortium of businessmen for an undisclosed payment. Heriot development, the consortium, now plans to develop this site to accommodate a hotel and country club. The existing Whitegates House is to be converted into a luxury hotel.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Construction Contracts
Hence, as early as in 1677, the Statute of Frauds was enacted supposedly in order to prevent fraud, perjury and other falsehoods that may attach in an agreement if this is not reduced in written form. (Statute of Frauds 1677. An Act for prevention of Frauds and Perjuryes.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Frustrated Contracts
These two acts by Dixie Wholesalers on their own behalf, effectively gave them two faces in regards to their cargo and its transport. It put Dixie Wholesalers in the position of ‘consignor’ and ‘consignee’, of a f.o.b. shipment.
14 pages (3500 words) Essay
Construction contracts
The client has therefore requested that the progress of the project be evaluated so that possible solutions may be conceived and evolved that will help in identifying the areas that may be accelerated in order to hasten the pace of construction. The client,
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Following the offer, the offeree must either in express or implied terms accept to enter into the agreement to fulfill he/her part of the bargain under the terms and conditions specified. Parties must be of sound mind and of legal age
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Learning contracts
I have been keeping records of the workflow depending on technical and fundamental factors of the economy of the community where the business
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Employment Contracts –This contract is an agreement between the employer and its employees and is essential for any business that plans on hiring workers (McKendrick Pg67). The contract contains the details pertaining to issues such as the payment, duties and responsibilities of the employee as well as other subject matters with regard to the relationship between the employee and the employer.
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Essay on topic Contrasting the Hobbesian and Lockeian Social Contracts for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
Join us:
Contact Us