Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Fukuyama and the Regulation of Love - Essay Example

Free
Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0

Summary

The problem is that one pharmaceutical company would like to market a type of medication that interferes with a person’s neurochemicals in order to reduce the degree of romantic attachment. …

Extract of sample
Fukuyama and the Regulation of Love

According to Fukuyama’s philosophy, there is no identifiable or definite Factor X which defines a human being. Fukuyama believes that Factor X is not the human tendency to make moral choices or to act with reason or to speak a language, or possess emotions or a consciousness, or everything else that we think defines our humanity. Instead, Fukuyama believes that Factor X is the sum total of all of these things. Nevertheless, this sum total is still largely undefined and cannot therefore be pointed out. This means that the term “Factor X” is nothing more than an arbitrary representation of the vague and actually unidentifiable humanity in each one of us. Fukuyama then concludes that this Factor X, or whatever it is that makes a human being human, must be protected against biotechnology. If biotechnology were to interfere with human affairs, there is a huge possibility that it will modify Factor X and change human nature not for the better but for the worst. Moreover, Fukuyama calls on international legal organizations to define the limits of human experiments in biotechnology and to limit biotechnology itself. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Philosophy short essays
This means that a human has very limited and concise knowledge, wisdom and morality and no matter how much one tries to grasp all the knowledge, it is not possible as a person to absorb everything. Thus, Socrates believes that irrespective of all the knowledge he possesses, he still does not know anything. This leads to self-questioning and judging one's self whether what we assume is actually true or just a vague illusion. Nothing was completely pure and perfect for Socrates. He believed that there was more to explore. Another perspective can be that Socrates was so ignorant that through this…
4 pages (1004 words)
Philosophy paper
On a comparative approach a major theme that can be retrieved from these books is the aspect of Buddhism as a religion as well as the incorporation of what Kitaro Nishida term as “Pure Existence”. Introduction This paper will seek to make a comparative study approach to compare and contrast in detail the following physiological texts. These include; “What the Buddha Taught” by Walpola Rahula and “An Inquiry Into The Good” by Kitaro Nishida and translated by Masao Abe and Christopher Ives. The notion behind the book, “What the Buddha Taught” was first to introduce the concept of…
8 pages (2008 words)
Hobbes and Locke - Philosophy Paper
The "nature of state" is that this desire can only be kept under control by the supreme power of the sovereign. In Chapter X Hobbes describes that "the nature of state" cannot be applied to all situation of human behavior.…
5 pages (1255 words)
Philosophy Paper
ually ‘irrelevant’ to the real world today given the fact that it involves defying the governing laws and being ready to face the penalty that are set by these same laws. This proves to be a contradictory, shallow, and an ineffective means of achieving both political and social objectives as compared to radical attack.…
5 pages (1255 words)