Philosophy short paper

Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
The problem is that one pharmaceutical company would like to market a type of medication that interferes with a person’s neurochemicals in order to reduce the degree of romantic attachment. The rationale behind this is that this drug is supposed to help people who are dealing…

Introduction

According to Fukuyama’s philosophy, there is no identifiable or definite Factor X which defines a human being. Fukuyama believes that Factor X is not the human tendency to make moral choices or to act with reason or to speak a language, or possess emotions or a consciousness, or everything else that we think defines our humanity. Instead, Fukuyama believes that Factor X is the sum total of all of these things. Nevertheless, this sum total is still largely undefined and cannot therefore be pointed out (“Our Posthuman Future”). This means that the term “Factor X” is nothing more than an arbitrary representation of the vague and actually unidentifiable humanity in each one of us.
Fukuyama then concludes that this Factor X, or whatever it is that makes a human being human, must be protected against biotechnology. If biotechnology were to interfere with human affairs, there is a huge possibility that it will modify Factor X and change human nature not for the better but for the worst. Moreover, Fukuyama calls on international legal organizations to define the limits of human experiments in biotechnology and to limit biotechnology itself (“Our Posthuman Future”).
Although some sectors of society would contend that it would be impossible to regulate biotechnology, for Fukuyama, it is possible, and there are reasons to it. First, anticipated imperfect results should not discourage us from trying certain methods of regulation. Second, biotechnology can be dealt with at the national level and does not exactly need any international agreement. Third, we should emphasize the ban on certain biotechnology ideas except those for therapeutic purposes only. Thus, cloning of humans must be strictly prohibited, as well as anything else that does not contribute to therapy (“Our Posthuman Future”). This is debatable, however, since some of those that have potential therapeutic value can actually alter Factor X.
For Fukuyama, the natural rights argument is ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Philosophy short essays
This means that a human has very limited and concise knowledge, wisdom and morality and no matter how much one tries to grasp all the knowledge, it is not possible as a person to absorb everything. Thus, Socrates believes that irrespective of all the knowledge he possesses, he still does not know anything. This leads to self-questioning and judging one's self whether what we assume is actually…
Philosophy paper
On a comparative approach a major theme that can be retrieved from these books is the aspect of Buddhism as a religion as well as the incorporation of what Kitaro Nishida term as “Pure Existence”. Introduction This paper will seek to make a comparative study approach to compare and contrast in detail the following physiological texts. These include; “What the Buddha Taught” by Walpola…
Hobbes and Locke - Philosophy Paper
The "nature of state" is that this desire can only be kept under control by the supreme power of the sovereign. In Chapter X Hobbes describes that "the nature of state" cannot be applied to all situation of human behavior.…
short essay philosophy Women philosophy
He affirmed that although the soul is conceived as a material, it is distinctly separate from it (Women Philosophers, PP 18).…
short essay philosophy
He believed in the ability of man to do good. His philosophy entailed the inability of man to be evil. Socrates held that all the evil that occurred in the world did so because of the ignorance of man.…
Philosophy short paper
According to Fukuyama’s philosophy, there is no identifiable or definite Factor X which defines a human being. Fukuyama believes that Factor X is not the human tendency to make moral choices or to act with reason or to speak a language, or possess emotions or a consciousness, or everything else that we think defines our humanity. Instead, Fukuyama believes that Factor X is the sum total of all…
Philosophy Paper
ually ‘irrelevant’ to the real world today given the fact that it involves defying the governing laws and being ready to face the penalty that are set by these same laws. This proves to be a contradictory, shallow, and an ineffective means of achieving both political and social objectives as compared to radical attack.…