Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Business Ethics The Chevron/Texaco case clearly shows ignorance or moral ethics in business. This paper focuses on the environmental rights, moral duties related to developing national and the right of national sovereignty. The oil mining company extracted oil and dumped the toxic waste irresponsibly…
This means that the government protected the company because they were still dumping their waste irresponsibly. In return for their silence, the country would enjoy economic growth. Multinational companies have an upper hand on governments in developing nations. The developing nations have the need to grow. They need the large multinationals to stimulate economic growth. This country is rich in oil, a valuable resource. The multinational company dictated the terms of operation in that country. The government agreed to these terms at the expense of the citizens.(Oman 78) This shows weakness in the government. The politicians are more driven by short horizon policies that achieve economic growth and are blind to the long run impact on citizens and the economy. The agreement was made between the company and the politicians. Most politicians do not have the relevant skills to make such decisions as oil exploration. Multinationals take advantage of the illiteracy levels in developing nations to get ahead in business. They are, after all, large private companies whose priority is to make profits. In achieving this objective, it created employment for the locals. Increased income of the local employees improved their loving standards. The host country GDP improved as a result of the Chevron operations. These are the benefits that the previous government sought to achieve. ...
The government is in a position to set up public hospitals and dispensaries to take care of the local community health needs. This case shows failure of eh government in setting its priorities straight. It also indicates a lack of national sovereignty. The multinational dictates its terms of operations in that country. This was done to favor its own objectives. The government in a developing nation is powerless in the presence of a large multinational. Who protects such governments? Where were the World Bank and the UN? The safety of people, the environment and national sovereignty should be the responsibility of many bodies, and not just the governemnt. (Oman 112) The multinational in this case has failed in the following ways. First, it overlooked the global environmental laws that require proper waste management. It used its power and resources to manipulate the previous government into agreeing to its terms of service and keeping quiet on the harm the company caused. As a responsible company, it should have engaged in some corporate social responsibility. This includes but is not limited to treating waste before disposal, construction of a health unit to address the community health needs. Chevron management ignored all these. The current government realized the problem in the previous arrangement. Unlike the past weaker government, it has gone ahead and sued the company. The refusal of the state to settle is a clear indication of care it has for its citizens. Although the company sues the state for negative publicity, the company is on a losing battle from moral ethics stand. A mistake was done; it should have been addressed in all ways possible. The courts and the world would put more weight on the large company than on the fate of a few people suffering in ...
Cite this document
(“Business Ethic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/64247-business-ethic
(Business Ethic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Business Ethic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/64247-business-ethic.
Ethical issues are a must for any type of business in the world today. By setting up codes of conduct and corporate values, it would enable businesses introduce formal ethics programs. In this analysis I am going to look at AIG. AIG is the largest insurer with interests in both life and life insurance and we should strive to maintain our reputation in the world.
The main focus is the right of Chad and any other poor nation, maintaining its right of national sovereignty. This comes as a result of the World Bank being iron fisted to Chad and requiring her to pass specific oil distribution laws if she was to get any financial assistance from the bank.
A multi-national company, for example, who engages in such unethical business research practices, can send shockwaves around the world as individuals, companies, and governments base their economic decisions on the data that is presented. The article summarized in this paper discusses the ramification of unethical business behavior and the effect that this can have on the future of the corporate world, and individual, for some time to come.
They should be laid down and followed to the later by all individuals in a company in order to create a conducive and friendly working environment. According to Applied-corporate-governance (1) Company and businesses that adopt business ethics are always successful in their work.
Such rules are directed towards professional workers. Especially in the case of an official who has to choose between the moral rules that ought to be integrated into her life.
To act morally in the public service department requires that an official keeps in
etween “those who own the firm” and those people who work for them regarding work matters, and accounting plays the role of a mediator to solve this conflict (Ryan 19). There are also cases when the owner or founder of a particular establishment also works as an employee of
There are a myriad ways in which ethical behavior or social responsibility can be expressed. This mainly depends on the laws, social culture and responsibility. Ethics can be broadly categorized into four views: utilitarian view of ethics,